| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:40:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Only perceived that way by some. OTOH, Bush, and Clinton, and Reagan did very little to rein in the profligate waste of oil, and seek alternatives. The depletion of oil reserves has been writ large on the wall since I was a kid. Leadership has failed to address it properly, so as to avoid a sharp transition and all the whining we hear now. Of course it was because of political pressures, so that's how it goes. Carter used to wear sweaters and told people to turn their heat down, and is generally mocked. We are all responsible, and will just have to work it out. Not that I'm a glass half-empty kind of guy, but two sci-fi stories always come to mind when I contemplate the future. Can't remember the titles or authors, but one addressed air pollution, and the answer to that problem was everybody wearing gas masks all the time. The other addressed over-population, and ended with the crew of a long-voyage space ship returning to earth and as they approached a coastal plain they wondered at the herds of animals munching grass and moss. The herd turned out to be humans. So cheer up! --Vic |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:40:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "HK" wrote in message ... NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Strong demand. What a crock of ****. Last spring, it was "on fears of renewed violence in Baghdad". Prices are effected by events in a country from which we get pretty much zero oil? Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Only perceived that way by some. OTOH, Bush, and Clinton, and Reagan did very little to rein in the profligate waste of oil, and seek alternatives. The depletion of oil reserves has been writ large on the wall since I was a kid. Leadership has failed to address it properly, so as to avoid a sharp transition and all the whining we hear now. Of course it was because of political pressures, so that's how it goes. Carter used to wear sweaters and told people to turn their heat down, and is generally mocked. We are all responsible, and will just have to work it out. Not that I'm a glass half-empty kind of guy, but two sci-fi stories always come to mind when I contemplate the future. Can't remember the titles or authors, but one addressed air pollution, and the answer to that problem was everybody wearing gas masks all the time. The other addressed over-population, and ended with the crew of a long-voyage space ship returning to earth and as they approached a coastal plain they wondered at the herds of animals munching grass and moss. The herd turned out to be humans. So cheer up! --Vic Everybody wants someone else to fix problems, because we have "the right to do whatever we want". yawn............ |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "Vic Smith" wrote in message ... On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 11:40:00 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: Can somebody please explain to me why high oil prices is perceived as a unique problem to the USA with Bush at the center of the cause? Only perceived that way by some. OTOH, Bush, and Clinton, and Reagan did very little to rein in the profligate waste of oil, and seek alternatives. Everybody wants someone else to fix problems, because we have "the right to do whatever we want". yawn............ Well, since my guess is as good as any, I'll offer my opinion. The primary reason for the dramatic world-wide increase in the price of oil is, IMO, ..... China. As China has gone through it's rapid industrialization and modernization, there have been several shortages of basic materials leading to spikes in prices. Quality stainless steel plate is becoming difficult to order for my son's business with huge increases in price when you can get it. The same was (still is to a degree) true with concrete. China was buying up everything that the world could produce. As China continues to industrialize and more and more of her population hang up their bicycles in favor of newly affordable automobiles, oil prices will continue to rise regardless of what any individual country, including the USA, does. All we can do is find alternatives to oil which is a daunting challenge. Eisboch |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 1, 10:33*am, HK wrote:
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Wow, sounds pretty bad when you spin it out of context that way... I saw the news conference, that's no quite the way it went down, but it's good enough for rec.boats I guess.. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. The more the 'anal'-ists talk about it, the more people will get primed for it. I'll probably happen. |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 1, 11:21*am, wrote:
On Mar 1, 10:33*am, HK wrote: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Wow, sounds pretty bad when you spin it out of context that way... I saw the news conference, that's no quite the way it went down, but it's good enough for rec.boats I guess.. Oh, but it is! The reporter even stated that analysts, not the reporter, state that gas could reach $4 a gallon by spring and those were Bush's exact words: "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that." |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 1, 11:58*am, wrote:
On Mar 1, 11:21*am, wrote: On Mar 1, 10:33*am, HK wrote: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Wow, sounds pretty bad when you spin it out of context that way... I saw the news conference, that's no quite the way it went down, but it's good enough for rec.boats I guess.. Oh, but it is! The reporter even stated that analysts, not the reporter, state that gas could reach $4 a gallon by spring and those were Bush's exact words: "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And Bush clearly indicated that he was not familiar with "that" analyst statements... that is all he said.. Spin it any way you want... But that is the context of that new DNC spin/lie... |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mar 1, 12:02 pm, wrote:
On Mar 1, 11:58 am, wrote: On Mar 1, 11:21 am, wrote: On Mar 1, 10:33 am, HK wrote: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Wow, sounds pretty bad when you spin it out of context that way... I saw the news conference, that's no quite the way it went down, but it's good enough for rec.boats I guess.. Oh, but it is! The reporter even stated that analysts, not the reporter, state that gas could reach $4 a gallon by spring and those were Bush's exact words: "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And Bush clearly indicated that he was not familiar with "that" analyst statements... that is all he said.. Spin it any way you want... But that is the context of that new DNC spin/lie...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, now, YOU are the one trying to spin. Here is the total transcript: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333553,00.html And here is the question, with Bush's ENTIRE answer: QUESTION: What's your advice to the average American who is hurting now -- facing the prospect of $4 a gallon gasoline, a lot of people facing... BUSH: Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4 a gallon gas? QUESTION: A number of analysts are predicting $4 a gallon gasoline this spring when they reformulate. BUSH: That's interesting. I hadn't heard that. QUESTION: Yes, sir. BUSH: Yes. I know it's high now. Now how is the DNC "spinning" that??? |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message
... On Mar 1, 12:02 pm, wrote: On Mar 1, 11:58 am, wrote: On Mar 1, 11:21 am, wrote: On Mar 1, 10:33 am, HK wrote: NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush, saying he was unaware of predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline in the coming months, told reporters Thursday that the best way to help Americans fend off high prices is for Congress to make his first-term tax cuts permanent. ... Analysts have said that gasoline could reach $4 a gallon by this spring, due to strong demand and a change in formulation, among other reasons. When taking the question about the $4 milestone, Bush told the reporter, *"That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."* Wow, sounds pretty bad when you spin it out of context that way... I saw the news conference, that's no quite the way it went down, but it's good enough for rec.boats I guess.. Oh, but it is! The reporter even stated that analysts, not the reporter, state that gas could reach $4 a gallon by spring and those were Bush's exact words: "That's interesting. I hadn't heard that."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And Bush clearly indicated that he was not familiar with "that" analyst statements... that is all he said.. Spin it any way you want... But that is the context of that new DNC spin/lie...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, now, YOU are the one trying to spin. Here is the total transcript: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,333553,00.html And here is the question, with Bush's ENTIRE answer: QUESTION: What's your advice to the average American who is hurting now -- facing the prospect of $4 a gallon gasoline, a lot of people facing... BUSH: Wait a minute. What did you just say? You're predicting $4 a gallon gas? QUESTION: A number of analysts are predicting $4 a gallon gasoline this spring when they reformulate. BUSH: That's interesting. I hadn't heard that. QUESTION: Yes, sir. BUSH: Yes. I know it's high now. Now how is the DNC "spinning" that??? By not doing anything to block the spread of that information. :-) Heh. :-) Everybody knows we own the media. We could've hidden that Bush travesty from the public. But because we all hate Bush and don't care about our soldiers and want to privatize all businesses blah blah blah...... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Our next president | General | |||
| I am the President! | ASA | |||
| ( OT) Help your president | General | |||
| ( OT ) Do we have a gay president? | General | |||