| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Don White wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Ask the Chinese..they'll shoot down your garbage for you. The Chinese are using our technology, which Bill Clinton illegally gave them access to, Donny! |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BAR" wrote in message
news ![]() Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Ask the Chinese..they'll shoot down your garbage for you. The Chinese are using our technology, which Bill Clinton illegally gave them access to, Donny! Yeah. That was bad. Almost as bad as the Reagan crew who sabotaged a perfectly planned sting operation which would've stopped Pakistan from illegally buying maraging steel for use in their nuclear weapon program. Crazy presidents. They're such wise guys, ya know? |
|
#3
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message news ![]() Don White wrote: "BAR" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Ask the Chinese..they'll shoot down your garbage for you. The Chinese are using our technology, which Bill Clinton illegally gave them access to, Donny! Yeah. That was bad. Almost as bad as the Reagan crew who sabotaged a perfectly planned sting operation which would've stopped Pakistan from illegally buying maraging steel for use in their nuclear weapon program. Crazy presidents. They're such wise guys, ya know? Geo-politics don't you love it. Just think what would have happened if in 1812 we just said the hell with it, Britain you can have us back? You have to do what is needed at the time to ensure your survival. You can think 20 or 30 years in the future but what you do today may mean you don't exist in 20 or 30 years. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Don White" wrote in message ... "BAR" wrote in message ... Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Ask the Chinese..they'll shoot down your garbage for you. I hope you're not using the US satellites for your GPS. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 14, 3:48*pm, BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. This is technology we have had for a long time. Remember the three HDD's that Chinese agent took from Alemeda with a slap on the wrist, ( remember the 3 million campaign contribution the Chinese military gave Billary before their final presidential run)? China shot a sattelite down a few months back probably with our technology, we just want them to know we can do it too... |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Feb 14, 2:48*pm, BAR wrote:
Eisboch wrote: This should be interesting. The US has decided to shoot down a failed satellite that is expected to drop out of orbit in early March. There is concern that half of the 5,000 lb satellite may remain intact and hit the earth in a yet unknown area. The plan is to shoot it down before it enters the earth's atmosphere with a missile fired from a US Navy ship. Details at 11. The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Well... what happens if most of the way up the missle sputters and peters out? then gravity tugs on the warhead then here it comes. OOPS! |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:48:04 -0500, BAR wrote:
The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Old technology. We've been able to bring down satellites since the mid-80s. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:48:04 -0500, BAR wrote: The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Old technology. We've been able to bring down satellites since the mid-80s. Are you sure about that? How? Eisboch |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:25:54 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:
wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:48:04 -0500, BAR wrote: The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Old technology. We've been able to bring down satellites since the mid-80s. Are you sure about that? How? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strateg...or_.28ERINT.29 |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:25:54 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote: wrote in message ... On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:48:04 -0500, BAR wrote: The article stated that they have a "modified" missile they are going to launch from a naval ship in the Pacific. The questions I have is what altitude will the missile intercept the satellite and how long have we been working on this "modified" missile? I can't see us coming up with a "modified" missile, launched from a surface vessel, in just a couple of months that is capable of intercepting an object in space. I believe this is an opportunity to flex our muscles. Old technology. We've been able to bring down satellites since the mid-80s. Are you sure about that? How? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strateg...or_.28ERINT.29 From a squid boat, in the middle of the ocean, using an existing tube and missile dimensions? |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| TV satellite | Electronics | |||
| Myth Busters Hydrogen Bull | General | |||
| Myth Busters | General | |||
| NetKKKop Busters... Thank-You..but | ASA | |||
| Satellite TV | Electronics | |||