On Feb 11, 8:19*am, "JimH" wrote:
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:57:04 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:52:14 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 21:16:23 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 16:23:55 -0800 (PST), Chuck Gould
wrote:

On Feb 10, 12:06?pm, John H.

The basis for even considering education in the discussion was a
claim
that D's oppose "No Child Left Behind", and thaty they do so because
if the amount of education were increased across the country the
number of people supporting the D's would decrease.

Which, by the way, was a valid claim.
--

Then according to your theory, the states with the greatest numbers of
Republicans will be those states with the most successful and
comprehensive educational systems. By the same token, the states with
the smallest number of Republicans will be those states where the
Democrats have succeeded on destroying the education system and
thereby protecting their base.

Care to offer some examples? Half *a dozen or so of each would be
sufficient to establish a trend, rather than an exception.

Education isn't a statewide function anywhere that I know of. It's a
county
or city function normally.

Unbelievable.

And you used to teach? *Who certified you - Wal-Mart?

JimH's argument methods...cut what you don't like and make comments about
the rest.

Go foch yourself John. *What the hell do *I* have to do with this
discussion?

You really are an asshole.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Does your priest know you act like that, Jim?