On Jan 27, 9:50*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.



Isn't that every Saturday?

On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 05:14:36 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.



Isn't that every Saturday?

Tim, have you ever been to Seattle? Remember the song, "The bluest skies
you'll ever see are in Seattle?"


It's true, but not as frequent as the gray skies. But, the skies are extra
blue to make up for the bad days. While in the military I tried for almost
30 years to get assigned to Ft. Lewis. Never made it.
--
John H

On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:
On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:

At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.

Isn't that every Saturday?

Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!

This is the second day we have had snow so far this year, but I think
it will all melt off in a couple of hours.

There is no reason anybody would want to come here. The weather is
horrible, the food is bad, the women are homely (except for my wife
and the wife or girlfriend of anybody I know), and everything is paved
over for hundreds of miles in every direction. I can't believe the 1/4
million people that have been falling for all the Chamber of Commerce
propaganda and relocating to Western Washington. Stay home, our
freeways are full... :-)

On Jan 28, 12:22Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:

At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.

Isn't that every Saturday?

Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!



snicker


BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!



snicker


BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

If I was Chuck, I would handle it exactly the way he is doing now. When
he posted a link, Harry would go on one of his manic rants accusing
Chuck of being a shill for the mfg'ers. He sounded exactly the way
Karen used to.

This way his boat reviews and his magazine are not dragged into
rec.boats name calling.

On Jan 28, 9:32Â*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!

snicker

BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

If I was Chuck, I would handle it exactly the way he is doing now. Â*When
he posted a link, Harry would go on one of his manic rants accusing
Chuck of being a shill for the mfg'ers. Â*He sounded exactly the way
Karen used to.

This way his boat reviews and his magazine are not dragged into
rec.boats name calling.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It makes more sense to participate here as an individual. I express
opinions that are entirely my own and that may or may not reflect
those of my publisher. If I participated from the perspective of
"Editor of ______" it might imply that the publication had some
specific opinions or agenda, and that is not the case.

On Jan 28, 12:42Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 9:32Â*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here





wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!

snicker

BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

If I was Chuck, I would handle it exactly the way he is doing now. Â*When
he posted a link, Harry would go on one of his manic rants accusing
Chuck of being a shill for the mfg'ers. Â*He sounded exactly the way
Karen used to.

This way his boat reviews and his magazine are not dragged into
rec.boats name calling.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It makes more sense to participate here as an individual. I express
opinions that are entirely my own and that may or may not reflect
those of my publisher. If I participated from the perspective of
"Editor of ______" it might imply that the publication had some
specific opinions or agenda, and that is not the case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, you know how Harry operates. If you own something and Harry
doesn't, it's not worth having. If you live somewhere other than where
Harry lives, it's not worth living there. If you write about something
that doesn't interest Harry, you shouldn't post it.

On Jan 28, 12:53Â*pm, wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:42Â*pm, Chuck Gould wrote:





On Jan 28, 9:32Â*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here

wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!

snicker

BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry..
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

If I was Chuck, I would handle it exactly the way he is doing now. Â*When
he posted a link, Harry would go on one of his manic rants accusing
Chuck of being a shill for the mfg'ers. Â*He sounded exactly the way
Karen used to.

This way his boat reviews and his magazine are not dragged into
rec.boats name calling.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It makes more sense to participate here as an individual. I express
opinions that are entirely my own and that may or may not reflect
those of my publisher. If I participated from the perspective of
"Editor of ______" it might imply that the publication had some
specific opinions or agenda, and that is not the case.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh, you know how Harry operates. If you own something and Harry
doesn't, it's not worth having. If you live somewhere other than where
Harry lives, it's not worth living there. If you write about something
that doesn't interest Harry, you shouldn't post it.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yeah and??? I heard a black commedian make a comment on racism
just after the Imus affair, might have been Jamie Foxx, don't remember
either way, it somewhat changed my life, at my tender young age. He
said simply: "It is not was someone calls you, it is what you answer
to". To me it was just profound... a new way to approach life... it's
kinda' neat, some more of you should try it... er, um,, while
boating

On Jan 28, 12:32Â*pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" "Reggie is Here
wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!

snicker

BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....

If I was Chuck, I would handle it exactly the way he is doing now. Â*When
he posted a link, Harry would go on one of his manic rants accusing
Chuck of being a shill for the mfg'ers. Â*He sounded exactly the way
Karen used to.

This way his boat reviews and his magazine are not dragged into
rec.boats name calling.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Harry? Name calling.. So what? Harry and others are going to act like
that no matter what happens. It should not make any difference to
Chucks mag, or any other thinking participant...

wrote:
On Jan 28, 12:22 pm, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Jan 28, 5:14�am, Tim wrote:

On Jan 27, 9:50�am, Chuck Gould wrote:
At least at the indoor venue, on a cold and rainy Saturday.
Isn't that every Saturday?
Yes, yes!

It rains here every day.
Except today, when it actually snowed!



snicker


BTW and I am no net cop, but I do have an opinion on the whole
spamming thing.. (who'd a thunk huh, with my recent post but you,
and for that matter in my opinion I and dozens of others who
participate here on a regular basis should not feel at all bad about
noting boat related businesses they are involved in. So you should not
feel badly about posting a name of your mag, or a link to an article
for that matter, as should anyone else here involved in the industry.
Just my opinion. Although we do reserve the right to browbeat you over
your silly political views....


I don't have the slightest problem with posts from those in the boating
or boat-related businesses. I do find Chuck's boat reviews little more
than advertorials, but that's his business and I'd certainly never file
a complaint about them with the non-authorities who run usenet.

It wouldn't trouble me if you ran your posts with an ad to your
boatbuilding site at the bottom, nor would I be distressed if you posted
photos of your boats, shop, whatever.