D.Duck wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"Tim" wrote in message
...

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than
a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.
The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.
Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!
The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows
his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would look
nice next to his double wide though.


Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some
wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.

The biggest problem is that a double wide is not as big as a triple wide.

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..
D.Duck wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message
...
"Tim" wrote in message
...

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than
a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking.
I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.
The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other
guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm
ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.
Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!
The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows
his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would
look nice next to his double wide though.


Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some
wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.

The biggest problem is that a double wide is not as big as a triple wide.


Great observation. 8-)