|
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 9, 8:14*pm, Dan wrote:
wrote: On Jan 8, 8:32 pm, Dan wrote: wrote: On Jan 7, 9:28 pm, Dan wrote: wrote: On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer. See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you! What a piece of **** you are. *Now you've brought 2 of my family members into this. Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by some of the more moderate members ? He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones. That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy. His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been dragging on the ground! Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? *Try again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, **** boy, it's the truth. You should print this post and hang it on your wall so your husband/wife and child/children can see Daddy's handiwork! *If they are proud, they are dumber than you, Sally.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, speaking of, **** boy. Why did you act like a bad ass here when I offered to meet up with you, only to pussy out? Everyone here knows you don't live anywhere near Miami. Hey, asshole, I asked you where I live. *You didn't respond, Sally. *You pussied out on that one. I'll meet you at MIA anytime you want.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi, **** boy! You're too much of a little sissy to trust to go to MIA. Oh, and you've stated before you live in the Chicago area. |
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 9, 3:09*pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:17:56 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 8, 8:32*pm, Dan wrote: wrote: On Jan 7, 9:28 pm, Dan wrote: wrote: On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote: "Dan" wrote in message ... He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer. See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you! What a piece of **** you are. *Now you've brought 2 of my family members into this. Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by some of the more moderate members ? He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones. That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy. His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been dragging on the ground! Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? *Try again.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, **** boy, it's the truth. You should print this post and hang it on your wall so your husband/wife and child/children can see Daddy's handiwork! *If they are proud, they are dumber than you, Sally.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey, speaking of, **** boy. Why did you act like a bad ass here when I offered to meet up with you, only to pussy out? Everyone here knows you don't live anywhere near Miami. Loogy, didn't you just say that you weren't messing with him any more? -- John H "All decisions are the result of binary thinking."- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No. |
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 9, 6:25*pm, Tim wrote:
wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, questions arose like hmmm, I wonder exactly what happened when the VRO quit the first time. And hmmm, no harm "as far as he could tell"! |
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 9, 6:33*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. * *I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and your sissy red boat that needs work from a qualified mechanic your first season tells alot about you..... |
Opinion on this boat
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though. Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it. |
Opinion on this boat
"JimH" wrote in message ... "D.Duck" wrote in message ... "JimH" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though. Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it. sigh That's probably how much you know about them. |
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 10, 11:21*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message ... "Tim" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. * *I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though. Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Jim's just a little pussy that hides behind the newsgroup because he doesn't have any balls to say anything to anyone's face. Hell, he even uses his kids to inflate his ego, so what do you expect? |
Opinion on this boat
On Jan 10, 11:39*am, "D.Duck" wrote:
"JimH" wrote in message ... "D.Duck" wrote in message m... "JimH" wrote in message .. . "Tim" wrote in message .... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. * *I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though. Explain to us just what's wrong with a double wide except there are some wildly exaggerated connotations connected to it. sigh That's probably how much you know about them.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - He seems to have a real hangup about them, he comments about them a lot! Wonder why? I'm still wondering what he has against fishing boats. He's getting a lot like Harry, if he can't have one, then no one else should want one! |
Opinion on this boat
John H. wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 07:22:30 -0800 (PST), wrote: On Jan 9, 6:33 pm, "JimH" wrote: "Tim" wrote in message ... wrote: On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote: That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc. Thanks for the input. The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended. Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I thought it would. Good luck with it. Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed! The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was: http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah, like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern. especially after reading the comment: "Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell". i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk. The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his taste in and knowledge of boats. I would think the boat would look nice next to his double wide though.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yeah, and your sissy red boat that needs work from a qualified mechanic your first season tells alot about you..... When you see a post like that, you should be thinking, "....worthless as tits on a boar hog" and keep on chuckin'. I do remember when JimH purchased that boat. He was absolutely positive that he had purchased a cherry of a boat, maintained perfectly, that he found the perfect marina and the best mechanic on Lake Erie. Opps. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com