Opinion on this boat
 

On Jan 7, 9:28*pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message

...

He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.
See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!
What a piece of **** you are. *Now you've brought 2 of my family members
into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by
some of the more moderate members ?

He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's
record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones.
That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy.
His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been
dragging on the ground!

Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? *Try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, **** boy, it's the truth.

Opinion on this boat
 

On Jan 7, 7:58*pm, Tim wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:21*am, wrote:





On Jan 4, 10:16*pm, Tim wrote:

On Jan 4, 8:27*am, wrote:

Besides, I've
always liked speed. I've raced snowmobiles, motocross, dirt sprint
cars, etc. all of my life.- Hide quoted text -

When I was a kid I did some "hot shoeing" around a half mile dirt
track on a *modified Bultaco 250 Pursang, But this is my favorite
'racing" that is, if you want to call it that.

I mean *how slow can you go? I never ever was very good at it, But I
know some guys that were amazing!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=MY_bITpYNwA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PS575jtaIBs&NR=1

http://youtube.com/watch?v=XYKWSRFWebo

Back in my day, they had trials events but nothing like that! Back
then it was just in the woods, over downfall trees, etc.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I know. This is remarkable, isn't it? yes, I remember the day with the
logs, and creek beds. If you could balance on a bike more than 20
seconds you were a king dog. *Malcolm Smith was one of the greatest
trials riders of the 60's and he would stand in awe of these guys.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yep, it's been taken to a new level, that's for sure! As with most
things! When I raced snowmobiles, it was all oval racing, except for
when we fooled around as a group in the woods. Now they motocross the
things! Of course the snowmobiles of the early to mid 70's wouldn't
have standed up to that abuse!

Opinion on this boat
 

BAR wrote:
Dan wrote:
HK wrote:
Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.

See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!

What a piece of **** you are. Now you've brought 2 of my family
members into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same
behaviour by some of the more moderate members ?



Dan plays the same ID game as Reggieturdo:

om
m

As does Herringturdo:





And "Jim":






A$$hats, all of them, but not smart enough to bust through
real filters. :}


There are reasons for that, and you obviously know them. Your list of
alias is at least more than the three people you mention here - combined.

So...your point is??

Why in the world would anybody care who has had what e-mail addresses in
their posts made to a boating newsgroup?

Exactly.

Opinion on this boat
 

Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.

See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!
What a piece of **** you are. Now you've brought 2 of my family members
into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour
by some of the more moderate members ?
Gee, Donnie, I don't remember. Can you Google it for me?


Google this..... Dingy Boy!



What's "this", Diaper Donnie?

Go clip your boy's toenails.

Opinion on this boat
 

Opinion on this boat
 

On Jan 8, 8:32*pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:28 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.
See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!
What a piece of **** you are. *Now you've brought 2 of my family members
into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by
some of the more moderate members ?
He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's
record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones.
That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy.
His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been
dragging on the ground!
Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? *Try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, **** boy, it's the truth.

You should print this post and hang it on your wall so your husband/wife
and child/children can see Daddy's handiwork! *If they are proud, they
are dumber than you, Sally.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey, speaking of, **** boy. Why did you act like a bad ass here when I
offered to meet up with you, only to pussy out? Everyone here knows
you don't live anywhere near Miami.

Opinion on this boat
 

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:17:56 -0800 (PST), wrote:

On Jan 8, 8:32*pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:28 pm, Dan wrote:
wrote:
On Jan 7, 8:12 am, "Don White" wrote:
"Dan" wrote in message
...
He's busy at work on your wife's pant drawer.
See, Donnie, I can be as childish as you!
What a piece of **** you are. *Now you've brought 2 of my family members
into this.
Didn't you get your knuckles rapped a while back for this same behaviour by
some of the more moderate members ?
He's the lowest of the low lifes here. He's trying to beat JimH's
record for saying nasty, untrue things about people's loved ones.
That's why he's rec.boat's **** boy.
His knuckes can take a good rapping, after all, they've always been
dragging on the ground!
Is that your attempt at humor, Sally? *Try again.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, **** boy, it's the truth.

You should print this post and hang it on your wall so your husband/wife
and child/children can see Daddy's handiwork! *If they are proud, they
are dumber than you, Sally.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hey, speaking of, **** boy. Why did you act like a bad ass here when I
offered to meet up with you, only to pussy out? Everyone here knows
you don't live anywhere near Miami.

Loogy, didn't you just say that you weren't messing with him any more?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

Opinion on this boat
 

wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.

The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.

Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!

The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. it does look "patch 'n go" . Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

Opinion on this boat
 

Opinion on this boat
 

On Jan 9, 6:33*pm, "JimH" wrote:
"Tim" wrote in message

...







wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:11?pm, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 13:20:08 -0800 (PST), wrote:
That's exactly the $ range I was thinking, Tom. And I know that the
electronics aren't up to snuff, especially the paper chart! I'll be
using my stuff if I buy it. I'll look at the problem areas you
suggested, like the rear deck, and like you, I'm a little (more than a
little!) leery of the motor, that's the main reason I was asking. I'd
heard of those vintage unEvinrudes blowing up. I like my very old
Evinrude, but in that year range, I'd really rather have a Merc.
Thanks for the input.

The base engine is fine - it's the VRO that is flaky. I replaced one
of mine on the 393V I owned, but never had another problem. Other guys
who ran them went through two or three of them. ?It just depended.

Oh, with respect to the hot foot - give it a chance - you can always
remove it if you decide you don't like it. ?Personally, I'm ambivilent
about them. I had one once and it didn't really annoy me as much as I
thought it would.

Good luck with it.

Went up and looked at it last night. Besides the hotfoot, the
hillbilly did quite a lot of..... let's say.... customizing that I
didn't care for. Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system,
but when it failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".
The battery/electrical wiring looked like my 8 year old did it. Now
all of this wouldn't have been bad, I love having a project, but he
wouldn't come down to anywhere near 3 grand so I passed!

The more I looked at it, the more disgusted I was:
http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i3...l/CIMG0341.jpg

Yes, you would certianly thinkt hat if a person was wanting to get a
NADA like value out of it, they would at least have the energy *to
clean the thing up and make it presentable. and I see from that red
wire what you're talking about. *it does look "patch 'n go" *. Yeah,
like I said, if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for
anybody. *Yeah, the validity of the engine would be a huge concern.
especially after reading the comment:

"Then he told me that he had replaced the VRO system, but when it
failed it didn't do any harm "as far as he could tell".

i believe you were wise to balk 'n walk.

The bottom line is that the fact that Booger was interested in it shows his
taste in and knowledge of boats. * *I would think the boat would look nice
next to his double wide though.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

And theres JimH again. So, Jim, tell us all, what evidence do you have
that I live in a double wide? Any? I expect not. Now are you going to
start saying ****ty untrue, bitter lies about me, my wife and my
children? That's what you usually do.