wrote:
On Dec 31, 11:46 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 31, 7:51 am, wrote:





On Dec 31, 12:08 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 30, 1:35�pm, JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:33:27 -0500, HK wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
...................
AP- Green Bay Times - Tue 12-21-07
The Green Bay Packers delivered a shocking announcement today. Their
starting quarterback this Sunday will be Mrs. Brett Favre, who will play for
Brett during the first quarter. Fans in Green Bay were shocked when this
announcement was made, but Mrs. Favre assured the fans that, "Hey, I know
this game. I live with Brett. I have taken several road trips on the team
plane. I've gone to the pre-game meal. I know a lot of the Packers. I've
played around with a lot of the Packers in the back yard. I've tossed the
football with them, and I know what a slot right 60-Prevent-Slot-Hook-And-Go
is and I know how to avoid a corner blitz." So they polled the people
inGreen Bay, 50% of Packers fans are excited, motivated, looking forward to
the big game.
All right, you think that's ridiculous? Let me reread this. In a shocking
announcement today, Mrs. Hillary Clinton announced that she is running for
President of the United States because she knows Bill Clinton and has lived
with him, and she was there on a lot of trips to China and around the world,
and she really cared about kids for 35 years. She's fought and she stood up
for kids, and she's tried to fix health care, and she knows fifty percent of
the American people say, "That's good enough for us."
Which of the right-wing Republican idiots, lunatics or incompetents are
you support, Bill?
Mitt "I was against flip-flopping until I changed my mind" Romney?
Rudy "I am *not* a crook even though the evidence indicates otherwise"
Guiliani?
Mike "I know Jesus, so I don't have to know foreign policy" Huckabee?
Fred "Yes, I am Dead" Thompson?
Ron "I'm even crazier than I sound" Paul?
Duncan "The 2% in the Polls Solution" Hunter?
The only reasonable possibility on the GOP side is John McCain, and he
isn't crazy or right-wing enough for the GOP delegates.
Maybe you can write in Zell Miller. He's fine until his daily sedation
wears off.
Trolling, trolling, over the ocean blue...
Harry, shame on you.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Shame on Harry?
Uh, looks like Calif Bill started this one.
No bitch at Calif Bill because he launched a right wing troll, but you
single out the first moderately left responder?
Did you know that some folks are so transparent, they will be
reincarnated as storm windows? :-)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Moderately left ?? Thats funny, and telling all at the same time.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Apparently you don't know many folks on the extreme left. Harry would
be perfectly at home as a precint captain for the D party out this
way, but not considered radically left in any sense--- Perhaps it's a
matter of perspective; we continue to reelect "Baghdad Jim" to the US
House and rather obviously the majority of voters think he's a fine
choice.
There are some regions in this country where Jim McDermott would be
more likely to be lynched than elected to congress. :-)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Apparently you need to expose yourself to folks who are actually
moderate. I challenge you to give us an example of one, just one,
right leaning view Harry has. I could name hundreds of the opposite,
hardly moderate. You need to expand your input if you think he is a
moderate representation of how Americans outside of Seattle think...



Actually, I am a quite moderate lefty. I believe Chuck is quite a bit
more to the left than I am. Chris Dodd is more to the left than I am,
just to put my place on the scale into a perspective that would be
familiar to you.

I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern,
evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP.





--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

HK wrote:
wrote:
On Dec 31, 11:46 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 31, 7:51 am, wrote:





On Dec 31, 12:08 am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 30, 1:35�pm, JohnH wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:33:27 -0500, HK
wrote:
Calif Bill wrote:
...................
AP- Green Bay Times - Tue 12-21-07
The Green Bay Packers delivered a shocking announcement today.
Their
starting quarterback this Sunday will be Mrs. Brett Favre, who
will play for
Brett during the first quarter. Fans in Green Bay were shocked
when this
announcement was made, but Mrs. Favre assured the fans that,
"Hey, I know
this game. I live with Brett. I have taken several road trips on
the team
plane. I've gone to the pre-game meal. I know a lot of the
Packers. I've
played around with a lot of the Packers in the back yard. I've
tossed the
football with them, and I know what a slot right
60-Prevent-Slot-Hook-And-Go
is and I know how to avoid a corner blitz." So they polled the
people
inGreen Bay, 50% of Packers fans are excited, motivated, looking
forward to
the big game.
All right, you think that's ridiculous? Let me reread this. In a
shocking
announcement today, Mrs. Hillary Clinton announced that she is
running for
President of the United States because she knows Bill Clinton
and has lived
with him, and she was there on a lot of trips to China and
around the world,
and she really cared about kids for 35 years. She's fought and
she stood up
for kids, and she's tried to fix health care, and she knows
fifty percent of
the American people say, "That's good enough for us."
Which of the right-wing Republican idiots, lunatics or
incompetents are
you support, Bill?
Mitt "I was against flip-flopping until I changed my mind" Romney?
Rudy "I am *not* a crook even though the evidence indicates
otherwise"
Guiliani?
Mike "I know Jesus, so I don't have to know foreign policy"
Huckabee?
Fred "Yes, I am Dead" Thompson?
Ron "I'm even crazier than I sound" Paul?
Duncan "The 2% in the Polls Solution" Hunter?
The only reasonable possibility on the GOP side is John McCain,
and he
isn't crazy or right-wing enough for the GOP delegates.
Maybe you can write in Zell Miller. He's fine until his daily
sedation
wears off.
Trolling, trolling, over the ocean blue...
Harry, shame on you.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Shame on Harry?
Uh, looks like Calif Bill started this one.
No bitch at Calif Bill because he launched a right wing troll, but you
single out the first moderately left responder?
Did you know that some folks are so transparent, they will be
reincarnated as storm windows? :-)- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Moderately left ?? Thats funny, and telling all at the same
time.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Apparently you don't know many folks on the extreme left. Harry would
be perfectly at home as a precint captain for the D party out this
way, but not considered radically left in any sense--- Perhaps it's a
matter of perspective; we continue to reelect "Baghdad Jim" to the US
House and rather obviously the majority of voters think he's a fine
choice.
There are some regions in this country where Jim McDermott would be
more likely to be lynched than elected to congress. :-)- Hide quoted
text -

- Show quoted text -

Apparently you need to expose yourself to folks who are actually
moderate. I challenge you to give us an example of one, just one,
right leaning view Harry has. I could name hundreds of the opposite,
hardly moderate. You need to expand your input if you think he is a
moderate representation of how Americans outside of Seattle think...



Actually, I am a quite moderate lefty. I believe Chuck is quite a bit
more to the left than I am. Chris Dodd is more to the left than I am,
just to put my place on the scale into a perspective that would be
family to you.

Chuck is an I got mine you give him yours liberal.

I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern,
evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP.

You are an intolerant racist.

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:


I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern,
evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP.

You are an intolerant racist.



Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy?

Let's see:

"Modern" no racial implication
"evangelical-infested" no racial implication
"but" no racial implication
"Jesusless" no racial implication
"GOP" no racial implication


Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no
racism in it.

I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not
follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their
hypocrisy," not racism.

You should have gone back to high school.


--
George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever!

HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:


I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern,
evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP.

You are an intolerant racist.



Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy?

Those that you aren't a member of Harry. We have years and years of your
racist posts. You seem to have a need to categorize people. People are
people why do you have state their race at every turn.

Let's see:

"Modern" no racial implication
"evangelical-infested" no racial implication
"but" no racial implication
"Jesusless" no racial implication
"GOP" no racial implication


Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no
racism in it.

Nice try. It may clear your consience but it won't clear your name.

I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not
follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their
hypocrisy," not racism.

Wasn't it you who said that Jesus was a nobody just a couple of weeks
ago? Why do you give so much weight to Jesus's teachings when he was
just another guy talking about irrelevant stuff 2000 years ago?

You should have gone back to high school.

You can do better than that!

BAR wrote:
HK wrote:
BAR wrote:
HK wrote:


I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern,
evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP.

You are an intolerant racist.



Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy?

Those that you aren't a member of Harry. We have years and years of your
racist posts. You seem to have a need to categorize people. People are
people why do you have state their race at every turn.

Let's see:

"Modern" no racial implication
"evangelical-infested" no racial implication
"but" no racial implication
"Jesusless" no racial implication
"GOP" no racial implication


Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no
racism in it.

Nice try. It may clear your consience but it won't clear your name.

I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not
follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their
hypocrisy," not racism.

Wasn't it you who said that Jesus was a nobody just a couple of weeks
ago? Why do you give so much weight to Jesus's teachings when he was
just another guy talking about irrelevant stuff 2000 years ago?

You should have gone back to high school.

You can do better than that!


Ahh, I can see that logical presentation of argument is something that
has never crossed your little brain.