Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 7:51Â*am, wrote:
On Dec 31, 12:08Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 1:35�pm, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:33:27 -0500, HK wrote: Calif Bill wrote: ................... AP- Green Bay Times - Tue 12-21-07 The Green Bay Packers delivered a shocking announcement today. Their starting quarterback this Sunday will be Mrs. Brett Favre, who will play for Brett during the first quarter. Fans in Green Bay were shocked when this announcement was made, but Mrs. Favre assured the fans that, "Hey, I know this game. I live with Brett. I have taken several road trips on the team plane. I've gone to the pre-game meal. I know a lot of the Packers. I've played around with a lot of the Packers in the back yard. I've tossed the football with them, and I know what a slot right 60-Prevent-Slot-Hook-And-Go is and I know how to avoid a corner blitz." So they polled the people inGreen Bay, 50% of Packers fans are excited, motivated, looking forward to the big game. All right, you think that's ridiculous? Let me reread this. In a shocking announcement today, Mrs. Hillary Clinton announced that she is running for President of the United States because she knows Bill Clinton and has lived with him, and she was there on a lot of trips to China and around the world, and she really cared about kids for 35 years. She's fought and she stood up for kids, and she's tried to fix health care, and she knows fifty percent of the American people say, "That's good enough for us." Which of the right-wing Republican idiots, lunatics or incompetents are you support, Bill? Mitt "I was against flip-flopping until I changed my mind" Romney? Rudy "I am *not* a crook even though the evidence indicates otherwise" Guiliani? Mike "I know Jesus, so I don't have to know foreign policy" Huckabee? Fred "Yes, I am Dead" Thompson? Ron "I'm even crazier than I sound" Paul? Duncan "The 2% in the Polls Solution" Hunter? The only reasonable possibility on the GOP side is John McCain, and he isn't crazy or right-wing enough for the GOP delegates. Maybe you can write in Zell Miller. He's fine until his daily sedation wears off. Trolling, trolling, over the ocean blue... Harry, shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Shame on Harry? Uh, looks like Calif Bill started this one. No bitch at Calif Bill because he launched a right wing troll, but you single out the first moderately left responder? Did you know that some folks are so transparent, they will be reincarnated as storm windows? Â*:-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Moderately left ?? Â* Â*Thats funny, and telling all at the same time.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Apparently you don't know many folks on the extreme left. Harry would be perfectly at home as a precint captain for the D party out this way, but not considered radically left in any sense--- Perhaps it's a matter of perspective; we continue to reelect "Baghdad Jim" to the US House and rather obviously the majority of voters think he's a fine choice. There are some regions in this country where Jim McDermott would be more likely to be lynched than elected to congress. :-) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 11:46Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote:
On Dec 31, 7:51Â*am, wrote: On Dec 31, 12:08Â*am, Chuck Gould wrote: On Dec 30, 1:35�pm, JohnH wrote: On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:33:27 -0500, HK wrote: Calif Bill wrote: ................... AP- Green Bay Times - Tue 12-21-07 The Green Bay Packers delivered a shocking announcement today. Their starting quarterback this Sunday will be Mrs. Brett Favre, who will play for Brett during the first quarter. Fans in Green Bay were shocked when this announcement was made, but Mrs. Favre assured the fans that, "Hey, I know this game. I live with Brett. I have taken several road trips on the team plane. I've gone to the pre-game meal. I know a lot of the Packers. I've played around with a lot of the Packers in the back yard. I've tossed the football with them, and I know what a slot right 60-Prevent-Slot-Hook-And-Go is and I know how to avoid a corner blitz." So they polled the people inGreen Bay, 50% of Packers fans are excited, motivated, looking forward to the big game. All right, you think that's ridiculous? Let me reread this. In a shocking announcement today, Mrs. Hillary Clinton announced that she is running for President of the United States because she knows Bill Clinton and has lived with him, and she was there on a lot of trips to China and around the world, and she really cared about kids for 35 years. She's fought and she stood up for kids, and she's tried to fix health care, and she knows fifty percent of the American people say, "That's good enough for us." Which of the right-wing Republican idiots, lunatics or incompetents are you support, Bill? Mitt "I was against flip-flopping until I changed my mind" Romney? Rudy "I am *not* a crook even though the evidence indicates otherwise" Guiliani? Mike "I know Jesus, so I don't have to know foreign policy" Huckabee? Fred "Yes, I am Dead" Thompson? Ron "I'm even crazier than I sound" Paul? Duncan "The 2% in the Polls Solution" Hunter? The only reasonable possibility on the GOP side is John McCain, and he isn't crazy or right-wing enough for the GOP delegates. Maybe you can write in Zell Miller. He's fine until his daily sedation wears off. Trolling, trolling, over the ocean blue... Harry, shame on you.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Shame on Harry? Uh, looks like Calif Bill started this one. No bitch at Calif Bill because he launched a right wing troll, but you single out the first moderately left responder? Did you know that some folks are so transparent, they will be reincarnated as storm windows? Â*:-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Moderately left ?? Â* Â*Thats funny, and telling all at the same time.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Apparently you don't know many folks on the extreme left. Harry would be perfectly at home as a precint captain for the D party out this way, but not considered radically left in any sense--- Perhaps it's a matter of perspective; we continue to reelect "Baghdad Jim" to the US House and rather obviously the majority of voters think he's a fine choice. There are some regions in this country where Jim McDermott would be more likely to be lynched than elected to congress. :-)- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Apparently you need to expose yourself to folks who are actually moderate. I challenge you to give us an example of one, just one, right leaning view Harry has. I could name hundreds of the opposite, hardly moderate. You need to expand your input if you think he is a moderate representation of how Americans outside of Seattle think... |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern, evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP. You are an intolerant racist. Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy? Let's see: "Modern" no racial implication "evangelical-infested" no racial implication "but" no racial implication "Jesusless" no racial implication "GOP" no racial implication Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no racism in it. I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their hypocrisy," not racism. You should have gone back to high school. -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
BAR wrote: HK wrote: I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern, evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP. You are an intolerant racist. Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy? Those that you aren't a member of Harry. We have years and years of your racist posts. You seem to have a need to categorize people. People are people why do you have state their race at every turn. Let's see: "Modern" no racial implication "evangelical-infested" no racial implication "but" no racial implication "Jesusless" no racial implication "GOP" no racial implication Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no racism in it. Nice try. It may clear your consience but it won't clear your name. I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their hypocrisy," not racism. Wasn't it you who said that Jesus was a nobody just a couple of weeks ago? Why do you give so much weight to Jesus's teachings when he was just another guy talking about irrelevant stuff 2000 years ago? You should have gone back to high school. You can do better than that! |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: BAR wrote: HK wrote: I simply have no use, absolutely no use, for the modern, evangelical-infested but Jesusless GOP. You are an intolerant racist. Racist? What *race* did I single out there, braindead boy? Those that you aren't a member of Harry. We have years and years of your racist posts. You seem to have a need to categorize people. People are people why do you have state their race at every turn. Let's see: "Modern" no racial implication "evangelical-infested" no racial implication "but" no racial implication "Jesusless" no racial implication "GOP" no racial implication Since there are no racial implications in my statement, there is no racism in it. Nice try. It may clear your consience but it won't clear your name. I do have little tolerance for self-proclaimed "Christians" who do not follow the teachings of Jesus, but that's called "disgust at their hypocrisy," not racism. Wasn't it you who said that Jesus was a nobody just a couple of weeks ago? Why do you give so much weight to Jesus's teachings when he was just another guy talking about irrelevant stuff 2000 years ago? You should have gone back to high school. You can do better than that! Ahh, I can see that logical presentation of argument is something that has never crossed your little brain. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 08:33:47 -0500, BAR wrote:
Just like Carl Rowen. Shot a kid for swimming in his pool in DC, where handguns were illegal. Did Carl Rowen, a good liberal, get prosecuted? No. In point of fact, Rowen was tried. The case ended in a hung jury, and he wasn't retried. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Saturday Football | ASA |