Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:



"The beads were smaller..."

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.



Harry,
I am don't know the actual physics behind the process of water beading,
it has some thing to do with surface tension of the water, and how the
car finish holds onto the water molecules determining the size of the
water droplets. The less surface tension on the car finish, the less it
will holds onto the water molecules and thus, the larger the water
droplets will be before their molecules pull apart. If the car finish
is pitted the surface tension of the car finish will be so strong it
will not allow the water to bead at all or the beads will be smaller.

Now I am going to ask you to either contribute to the discussion or butt
out of the discussion. It makes you look silly to comment on subjects
that are not familiar with. I don't want to have to ask you again.


My contribution: if you are going to rewrite something you find on
wikipedia, Reggie, try to do a better job of it, and if you make it back
here in another life, pay attention when your high school physics
teacher discusses hydrophobic interaction.

Have a nice day. Or not.

HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:



"The beads were smaller..."

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.



Harry,
I am don't know the actual physics behind the process of water
beading, it has some thing to do with surface tension of the water,
and how the car finish holds onto the water molecules determining the
size of the water droplets. The less surface tension on the car
finish, the less it will holds onto the water molecules and thus, the
larger the water droplets will be before their molecules pull apart.
If the car finish is pitted the surface tension of the car finish will
be so strong it will not allow the water to bead at all or the beads
will be smaller.

Now I am going to ask you to either contribute to the discussion or
butt out of the discussion. It makes you look silly to comment on
subjects that are not familiar with. I don't want to have to ask you
again.


My contribution: if you are going to rewrite something you find on
wikipedia, Reggie, try to do a better job of it, and if you make it back
here in another life, pay attention when your high school physics
teacher discusses hydrophobic interaction.

Have a nice day. Or not.

Harry,
I asked you not to respond if you can not contribute something to the
discussion. Now stop it.

Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
HK wrote:



"The beads were smaller..."

Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.



Harry,
I am don't know the actual physics behind the process of water
beading, it has some thing to do with surface tension of the water,
and how the car finish holds onto the water molecules determining the
size of the water droplets. The less surface tension on the car
finish, the less it will holds onto the water molecules and thus, the
larger the water droplets will be before their molecules pull apart.
If the car finish is pitted the surface tension of the car finish
will be so strong it will not allow the water to bead at all or the
beads will be smaller.

Now I am going to ask you to either contribute to the discussion or
butt out of the discussion. It makes you look silly to comment on
subjects that are not familiar with. I don't want to have to ask you
again.


My contribution: if you are going to rewrite something you find on
wikipedia, Reggie, try to do a better job of it, and if you make it
back here in another life, pay attention when your high school physics
teacher discusses hydrophobic interaction.

Have a nice day. Or not.

Harry,
I asked you not to respond if you can not contribute something to the
discussion. Now stop it.



Hydrophobic interaction.

Got it?