Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:39:16 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Absolutely non-abrasive, and cleans far better than any thing else I have ever used. Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk? Or brown mustache? |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:39:16 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Absolutely non-abrasive, and cleans far better than any thing else I have ever used. Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk? Or brown mustache? I don't want to know what you are talking about. ![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 21:57:45 -0400, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk? Or brown mustache? I don't want to know what you are talking about. ![]() Trust me, it's boat related. |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 28, 6:39?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III"
wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 27, 10:44?pm, sherwindu wrote: After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that there was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side of the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band of gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? I have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as well, so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. Sherwin You might try this stuff: http://lat43.com/marine.html Absolutely non-abrasive, and cleans far better than any thing else I have ever used. Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If it will take off spider poop, (and it does), water line scum should be easy. No, I have not personally used in on waer line gunk. There's a before and after photo on the web site showing what are reported to be the results of spraying a dirty bottomw with water, applying the soap, letting it sit a while, and then spraying again. I haven't done that either, but based on what I've been able to observe above the waterline I don't doubt that they got the results the photos illustrate. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Oct 28, 6:39?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Oct 27, 10:44?pm, sherwindu wrote: After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that there was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side of the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band of gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? I have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as well, so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. Sherwin You might try this stuff: http://lat43.com/marine.html Absolutely non-abrasive, and cleans far better than any thing else I have ever used. Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If it will take off spider poop, (and it does), water line scum should be easy. No, I have not personally used in on waer line gunk. There's a before and after photo on the web site showing what are reported to be the results of spraying a dirty bottomw with water, applying the soap, letting it sit a while, and then spraying again. I haven't done that either, but based on what I've been able to observe above the waterline I don't doubt that they got the results the photos illustrate. Our spider poop must not be as strong as the NW spider poop, I can just hose that off of my boat, even the parts I don't wax. |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:03:54 -0400, Reginald P. Smithers III penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: |Chuck Gould wrote: | On Oct 28, 6:39?pm, "Reginald P. Smithers III" | wrote: | Chuck Gould wrote: | On Oct 27, 10:44?pm, sherwindu wrote: | After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that | there | was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side | of | the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band | of | gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with | all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a | cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is | used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. | Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? | I | have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and | require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as | well, | so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. | Sherwin | You might try this stuff: | http://lat43.com/marine.html | Absolutely non-abrasive, and cleans far better than any thing else I | have ever used. | Chuck, have you used this stuff on water line gunk?- Hide quoted text - | | - Show quoted text - | | If it will take off spider poop, (and it does), water line scum should | be easy. No, I have not personally used in on waer line gunk. | | There's a before and after photo on the web site showing what are | reported to be the results of spraying a dirty bottomw with water, | applying the soap, letting it sit a while, and then spraying again. I | haven't done that either, but based on what I've been able to observe | above the waterline I don't doubt that they got the results the photos | illustrate. | | | |Our spider poop must not be as strong as the NW spider poop, I can just |hose that off of my boat, even the parts I don't wax. Boy, I can't..... you can hardly SCRUB that crap off..... even from things like glazed tile.... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for all the replies.
As far as wax, I give the hull a good coating of high quality boat wax before the spring launch, and it doesn't seem to help protect the boat. This fresh water river must have some nasty chemicals in it. I certainly wouldn't go in this water to try and clean the boat during the season. I have tried various products containing bleach, oxalic acid, etc. and haven't found an effective cleaner yet. I am still wondering if using these acid products full strength might do damage to the fiberglass, so maybe they should be diluted (how much?). If they use muriatic acid to etch concrete, that sounds scary. I will check out the 'on and off' product. I eventually got most of the stain off using a heavy duty liquid cleaner, but it took a lot of rubbing. I have used most of the commercial products mentioned in this thread, with not much luck. Sherwin sherwindu wrote: After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that there was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side of the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band of gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? I have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as well, so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. Sherwin |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sherwindu wrote:
Thanks for all the replies. As far as wax, I give the hull a good coating of high quality boat wax before the spring launch, and it doesn't seem to help protect the boat. This fresh water river must have some nasty chemicals in it. I certainly wouldn't go in this water to try and clean the boat during the season. I have tried various products containing bleach, oxalic acid, etc. and haven't found an effective cleaner yet. I am still wondering if using these acid products full strength might do damage to the fiberglass, so maybe they should be diluted (how much?). If they use muriatic acid to etch concrete, that sounds scary. I will check out the 'on and off' product. I eventually got most of the stain off using a heavy duty liquid cleaner, but it took a lot of rubbing. I have used most of the commercial products mentioned in this thread, with not much luck. Sherwin sherwindu wrote: After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that there was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side of the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band of gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? I have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as well, so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. Sherwin Check out Zaino Brothes before you put your boat back in the water. Make sure you order enough for your cars. It is the best, highest gloss, longest lasting showroom finish you will ever use. I tried this because someone told me it was the easiest wax to apply and had a great shine and long lasting protection. While it is easy, it makes my 7 yr old car look brand new. |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My experience with waxes are the easier they apply, the less protection. I only use
waxes with Carbona. It isn't easy to apply, but it lasts a whole season. Sherwin "Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote: sherwindu wrote: Thanks for all the replies. As far as wax, I give the hull a good coating of high quality boat wax before the spring launch, and it doesn't seem to help protect the boat. This fresh water river must have some nasty chemicals in it. I certainly wouldn't go in this water to try and clean the boat during the season. I have tried various products containing bleach, oxalic acid, etc. and haven't found an effective cleaner yet. I am still wondering if using these acid products full strength might do damage to the fiberglass, so maybe they should be diluted (how much?). If they use muriatic acid to etch concrete, that sounds scary. I will check out the 'on and off' product. I eventually got most of the stain off using a heavy duty liquid cleaner, but it took a lot of rubbing. I have used most of the commercial products mentioned in this thread, with not much luck. Sherwin sherwindu wrote: After pulling my boat from the Root River in Racine Wisconsin, I noticed that there was an ugly band of black gunk at the waterline, especially at the upstream side of the boat when it was in the slip. A power wash got the mud off, but this band of gunk stayed on. I had the same problem last year, and had to rub like hell with all kinds of cleaners to get it off. Someone recommended using Tidy Bowl as a cleaner, possibly because it contains Muratic Acid. I know that Muratic Acid is used to clean and etch concrete, so I was wary to use it on my fiberglass hull. Was I correct about this? Is there a better way to clean off this river junk? I have used Zud and other similar products, but they don't get everything off and require a lot of elbow grease. Some of this gunk is on the bottom paint, as well, so I have to be careful not to dissolve that. Sherwin Check out Zaino Brothes before you put your boat back in the water. Make sure you order enough for your cars. It is the best, highest gloss, longest lasting showroom finish you will ever use. I tried this because someone told me it was the easiest wax to apply and had a great shine and long lasting protection. While it is easy, it makes my 7 yr old car look brand new. |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sherwindu wrote:
My experience with waxes are the easier they apply, the less protection. I only use waxes with Carbona. It isn't easy to apply, but it lasts a whole season. Sherwin Sherwin, That was my opinion for 25 years, and is the reason I always used Carnauba Wax also and didn't even bother to try the new finishes available at the auto store. I tried Zaino after someone recommended it in rec.boats and I did a Google Search and found it was considered the best finish and protectant by all of the car clubs and auto enthusiast. The first year I tried Zaino Bros, (I think it was 4 yrs ago). I did an A/B experiment with my wife's car and my car. I did a complete detail on both cars, including using detail clay and the complete Meguiar's Car Care 3 step Carnauba Wax Program and the Zaino Bros. 3 step Polish. After I finished both cars were as slick as glass. While the Zaino Bros looked better initially, what I was really interested is how well it would last after 6 months, since I would always wax my car in the spring and fall. In the fall, the Zaino still had large beads of water on the car, and when I clayed the car, their was no pollution residual common off on the clay. The Mequiars car was still water beading, but the beads were smaller, and it the finish definitely had rough feel. When I clayed the car, I could see where the air pollution had pitted the finish, and I was getting the pollution residual on the clay. I also noticed that the Zaino car actually looked better the 2nd time i applied the finish. At this point, I gave alway the rest of the Meguiars to a neighbor and in the Spring time used Zaino on my boat and cars. I doubt you will try the Zaino, but I went through this explanation because I really believe in the product and hope that some other people will try it. It is truly amazing. What I thought was amusing is the owner Sal Zaino is the guy who answers the phone when you call up with a question. He has that gruff New York City voice. I think he is semi retired, but is the "answer line" for people who have technical questions about the product. It really does apply differently than most waxes and polishes. Since the Caranuba wax obviously isn't working on your water line gunk, why don't you try it after you clean off it with "Off and On"? If you do, you will need to let us know next fall if it did any good. Why do I feel like I am doing a late night infomercial? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bush ( a boater) has slime-mold beetle named after him | General | |||
carb cleaner? | General | |||
Fender slime/goo | General | |||
getting rid of hull slime? | General |