Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eisboch" wrote in message ... "D.Duck" wrote in message ... "Eisboch" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... "Eisboch" wrote in message m... I've been called in to help out today at.... (gulp) .... *work*. A long-time customer is visiting and I have to provide some sense of corporate continuity. Gotta get this over with so Sam and I can go back to the boat. Eisboch So how did it go? Not bad. He awarded the company a $800+K contract for a new thin film system. Eisboch (still got the "touch") Wow! Hope you get a good chunk of that ![]() this week, gonna' work on a local farm for the winter to get loosened up a little and trade off a little horsie time for my girls. Don't think I will be making as much as you did though ![]() work could be somewhat similar, I was off shoveling ****, how about you? ![]() Nah, I don't get any "chunk". I have a long term "consulting" deal that pays just about minimum wage, but keeps Mrs.E. and I eligible to participate in the company's health care program. When I was a kid living outside of New Haven, CT., I had a summer job mucking horse stalls for a guy that raised and trained thoughbred racing horses. Not for me. In addition to the .... well .... you know, I was also allergic to the hay dust. I swore I'd never do it again and I haven't, despite Mrs.E.'s three horses. If you want to get bored to tears, here's what I ended up doing for a living: http://www.vptec.com/ Eisboch Not boring at all. Brings back memories of my work at Bell Labs, about 20 years ago, as a CRT monitor design engineer. I worked with a West Coast company, OCLI, on a custom CRT panel with an AR coating. The process was great for no reduction in display resolution and anti-reflective properties. The disadvantage, cost. The panel added about 20 bux to an already too expensive, custom size CRT. The zero loss is resolution was just not appropriate for a plain jane alpha-numeric display. Now for something like medical monitors it was justified. I finally convinced marketing that a much less costly acid etch process applied directly to the CRT glass was appropriate. We built sputter deposition equipment for Tectonics, applying a conductive coating to the inside of ceramic CRT tubes. That technology was obsolete before it went to production, and a spin-off was started doing electroluminescent displays. We built equipment for them as well, and the company became what is now known as "PanelVision", a major supplier of flat panel screens. OCLI ? Very technically capable in their day, but a terrible company for an equipment manufacturer like us to deal with. They had quite a reputation of routinely sending out requests for technical proposals for systems they said they were going to buy. They would then review all the technical approaches taken by the various responders to meet OCLI's requirements, select the best of them, and then build the equipment themselves, using the technical specifications supplied by those of us that responded. In all the years that we dealt with them, they never bought a system from anybody. We have had more recent contracts with JDS Uniphase, the successor to OCLI. Eisboch I heard rumors about some unsavory business practices and OCLI. We only did business with them for a couple of years in the early 80's. Ahhhh, JDSU. Back in the 90's when I was a very active investor, JDSU is one I "wish" I would have dabbled in. Made quite a bit of money leading up to the "bubble". Should have listened to Greenspan and his "irrational exuberance" speech. Oh well, I did very well and never complain. Now as I approach 70 it's much more conservative investments. I do have quite a bit of Intel stock, but I feel that's reasonably safe. "When" is gets over $30 I'll get out and buy a bunch of CDs. My have things changed for me as I get older and more cautious. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|