Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"D.Duck" wrote in message
... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gigane ws.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion. |
#112
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"John H." wrote in message
... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message om... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4ax. com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@giga news.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion. Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were raped? Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post? Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing it intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid. There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If you're not aware of this....you know why. |
#113
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Oct 10, 6:58 pm, John H. wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:24:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message news:BOidnbj71r8Mo5DanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews. com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4ax .com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gig anews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion. Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were raped? Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post? Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing it intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid. There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If you're not aware of this....you know why. Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the rape. Sorry you consider a comment other than ' Dougie agreeable' so nauseating. If you look at the comments from a bunch of folks in the group, your comments aren't considered a 'source of enlightenment'!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Eisboch got it right earlier to day, just before Google shut me off for too many posts, too quickly I would think though that with no less than a dozen posters telling him he is full of ****, he would get the message. |
#114
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:08:10 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@giganew s.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Read my last. |
#115
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message m... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gigan ews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion. Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were raped? Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post? |
#116
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:24:07 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "D.Duck" wrote in message news:BOidnbj71r8Mo5DanZ2dnUVZWhednZ2d@giganews. com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:rrbqg3p5spkcfh3iaqnc6uag3jrekmj281@4ax .com... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Eisboch" wrote in message news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gig anews.com... "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message ... What do you think should happen if: - A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant - Her parents are fully aware of the rape - Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number performed following consenting sexual relations that results in an inconvenient pregnancy? Eisboch I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want to carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence? The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality. I think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as having an abortion a month or two later. In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can resolve the issue. John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion. Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were raped? Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post? Because you pounced as expected, which is nauseating. Either you're doing it intentionally to be annoying, or you're painfully stupid. There are other reasons a woman might not get treatment for a few days. If you're not aware of this....you know why. Now you're making your population *very* small. Maybe sex education in school should tell females to get treatment as soon as possible after the rape. Sorry you consider a comment other than ' Dougie agreeable' so nauseating. If you look at the comments from a bunch of folks in the group, your comments aren't considered a 'source of enlightenment'! |
#117
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:34:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:
6. Admitted Yankees fan. Number 5 (and 6) are bothersome for me. I view #6 as a plus of course. It is doubtful that she knew anything about the Yankees however before adopting NY as her home. I have seen Hilary work from close up. She is very adept, shrewd and does her homework very well. It's difficult to say what she really believes in other than ambition. |
#118
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"D.Duck" wrote in message ... John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? To me, if there was conception, then indeed, there is a fetus. Eisboch |
#119
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"Wayne.B" wrote in message ... On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:34:45 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote: 6. Admitted Yankees fan. Number 5 (and 6) are bothersome for me. I view #6 as a plus of course. It is doubtful that she knew anything about the Yankees however before adopting NY as her home. I have seen Hilary work from close up. She is very adept, shrewd and does her homework very well. It's difficult to say what she really believes in other than ambition. Ayup Eisboch |
#120
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Judging the performers...
"Eisboch" wrote in message ... "D.Duck" wrote in message ... John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment. How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts? Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after? To me, if there was conception, then indeed, there is a fetus. Eisboch I was going to carry on this discussion based on the medical definition that a "fetus" emerges at about eight weeks after conception. Prior to being a "fetus" it's technical name is embryo. I believe that's a pretty fine line. But why continue, this subject is a very personal matter and has to be resolved by each person individually. Not a subject I like to get into a ****ing contest over like some of the entries in this group. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
judging current; rules of thumb? | ASA | |||
Judging by the large number of military... | General | |||
you won't reject me judging before your sharp hallway | ASA | |||
get your wickedly judging exit towards my hair | ASA | |||
you won't tease me judging over your smart doorway | ASA |