On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:09:57 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"D.Duck" wrote in message
m...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:05:41 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
om...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:45:48 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Eisboch" wrote in message
news:hMidneFBRJUzgZDanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@gigan ews.com...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...


What do you think should happen if:

- A 16 year old girl is raped and becomes pregnant
- Her parents are fully aware of the rape
- Her parents are dead set against her having an abortion


How many abortions are performed due to rape versus the number
performed
following consenting sexual relations that results in an
inconvenient
pregnancy?

Eisboch


I don't know. Why is a statistic important to a girl who doesn't want
to
carry a baby that was conceived in an act of violence?


The 'morning after' pill seems designed for just such an eventuality.
I
think it should be part of any post-rape treatment.

Good for you. Unfortunately, certain cults think that pill is as bad as
having an abortion a month or two later.



In my scenario, there is no 'knowingly' killing a kid. That's how I can
resolve the issue.

John, that pill is pretty successful at doing its job, which is to kill a
fetus. And yet, you think it should be part of any post-rape treatment.
How do you resolve these apparently opposing concepts?

Do you believe there is a "fetus" the morning after?

No, but I *do* know that some women don't deal with the mess the very next
day, for various reasons, at least one of which someone here will pounce on
shortly, in a nauseatingly predictable fashion.


Are these women who wait five or six months and *then* decide they were
raped?

Why do you find it necessary to make personal attacks with every post?