On Sep 27, 6:32?pm, "William Bruce" wrote:
Are you compelled to respond in camacdonaldiii behalf with your stupid
remarks?

Is it your position, Don, that Harry Krause is a truthful individual?

Anybody hanging around this NG has had ample opportunity to form a
personal opinion of Harry's believablity. He has made a number of
claims about his personal life, his education, his possessions, etc
that for one reason or another he has never chosen to verify for the
skeptics.

Discussing whether or not HK is a "liar" makes a very booooring NG
topic. It doesn't bother Harry a bit as it keeps him in a spotlight of
some sort, even if it's not the best possible hue.

I don't personally understand the motivation for anybody to use the NG
as a blog. Few of the posters are actually acquainted, and who gives a
rip about the mundane details in the daily lives of complete
strangers? Harry's situation points out another danger of "blogging"
the NG. **** enough people off, and before long they begin digging
through the story of your life for apparent inconsistencies.