| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 01:15:03 +0000 (UTC), Bob penned the following
well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Yes, this post is on-topic. I just have to vent...thanks for listening. I live in an apartment and store my 17' v-hull I/O runabout boat in a storage facility. Whenever I need to work on it, I go get the boat and bring it to her house for a day or two and work on it there...nothing major -- just routine stuff like winterizing, tuneups, and other minor repairs or modifications...it's not like I'm leaving a junky boat half torn apart in her driveway. All has been well with this situation for the past 3 years or so until now. A rep of the homeowner's association which regulates the neighborhood my girlfriend lives in called her today saying that the association regulations prohibit working on boats and that boats could be loaded or unloaded only on your property. Where does one practically work on their boat if they cannot work on it at their house? I cannot afford to have someone do every little thing to my boat when it needs something done to it. Sure, I could probably get away with doing small things to it, but what about the other things like winterizing or getting it ready to go in the Spring? The way I see it, I am screwed and don't have much choice but to get rid of the boat. What a depressing thought that is, especially since it is a boat that has been in my family for 35 years, is running better than it ever has, not to mention how much enjoyment we get from it. I will never understand why anybody would willing sign a document binding themselves and (potentially) their heirs to an "association" which promises all of the restrictions of (yet another layer of) government, but with none of the expected protections. The typical level of intrusion into one's personal life and behavior is, IMHO, absolutely unacceptable! Do you really want to live your life according to a code of behavior that a bunch of busybodies will coercively force on you? .......especially, when *you* didn't sign the document to begin with? Buy your own nonrestricted homestead, then you can store and work on your property as *you* see fit. Invite the GF over to *your* place..... PS You will discover many other benefits and freedoms, as well. You'll be able to leave the toilet seat up, too, if you want to ..... -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
|
#2
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
I will never understand why anybody would willing sign a document binding themselves and (potentially) their heirs to an "association" which promises all of the restrictions of (yet another layer of) government, but with none of the expected protections. The typical level of intrusion into one's personal life and behavior is, IMHO, absolutely unacceptable! Do you really want to live your life according to a code of behavior that a bunch of busybodies will coercively force on you? ......especially, when *you* didn't sign the document to begin with? Buy your own nonrestricted homestead, then you can store and work on your property as *you* see fit. Invite the GF over to *your* place..... PS You will discover many other benefits and freedoms, as well. You'll be able to leave the toilet seat up, too, if you want to ..... Homeowners Associations are a popular developers/local government scam in Kalifornia and other areas. Basically, the building density can be much higher (more units per acre) and the HOA is responsible for road and drainage maintenance, code enforcement, etc, instead of the town or city. It is a very convenient way for the town/city to absolve themselves for responsibility to maintain the roads, the sewer and drain pipes, and do code enforcement. A very scummy arrangement that is good for the developers and the towns/cities, but really bad for the residents. Your suggestion to buy somewhere that doesn't have an HOA sounds really good, except that most people don't have the money to buy the kind of home they would REALLY like. In other words, not everyone is rich, or lives in an area that the housing cost are reasonable compared to wages. For us working folks, HOAs can be a necessary evil, if we want to buy SOME kind of home. It must be nice to have lots of $$. It is unfortunate that for many, it really warps their comprehension of the reality of life for for regular working folks. |
|
#4
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:02:26 -0700, penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Your suggestion to buy somewhere that doesn't have an HOA sounds really good, except that most people don't have the money to buy the kind of home they would REALLY like. In other words, not everyone is rich, or lives in an area that the housing cost are reasonable compared to wages. For us working folks, HOAs can be a necessary evil, if we want to buy SOME kind of home. It must be nice to have lots of $$. It is unfortunate that for many, it really warps their comprehension of the reality of life for for regular working folks. That is odd! Here in NC, it is the high end neighborhoods where HOAs are all the rage. Many HOAs seem to exist, in part, to enforce rules where it gives the illusion that no one in the neighborhood must either work for a living or do any personal manual labor (winterize the boat, for example). Its all about keeping you from putting that single wide in the backyard for mama and making sure that you don't have that old Chevy up on blocks in the front yard fro a couple of years. Most covenants are written such that you can keep a boat on the property if it is housed within a garage..... and many covenants prohibit an unattached garage. So.... you can have your boat if you can afford a house/garage big enough to house both. Go figure....... Its all about resale value. |
|
#5
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
"BAR" wrote in message . .. Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:02:26 -0700, penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Your suggestion to buy somewhere that doesn't have an HOA sounds really good, except that most people don't have the money to buy the kind of home they would REALLY like. In other words, not everyone is rich, or lives in an area that the housing cost are reasonable compared to wages. For us working folks, HOAs can be a necessary evil, if we want to buy SOME kind of home. It must be nice to have lots of $$. It is unfortunate that for many, it really warps their comprehension of the reality of life for for regular working folks. That is odd! Here in NC, it is the high end neighborhoods where HOAs are all the rage. Many HOAs seem to exist, in part, to enforce rules where it gives the illusion that no one in the neighborhood must either work for a living or do any personal manual labor (winterize the boat, for example). Its all about keeping you from putting that single wide in the backyard for mama and making sure that you don't have that old Chevy up on blocks in the front yard fro a couple of years. Most covenants are written such that you can keep a boat on the property if it is housed within a garage..... and many covenants prohibit an unattached garage. So.... you can have your boat if you can afford a house/garage big enough to house both. Go figure....... Its all about resale value. Yep! (As I stated earlier.) |
|
#6
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:29:24 -0400, BAR penned the following well
considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 12:02:26 -0700, penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Your suggestion to buy somewhere that doesn't have an HOA sounds really good, except that most people don't have the money to buy the kind of home they would REALLY like. In other words, not everyone is rich, or lives in an area that the housing cost are reasonable compared to wages. For us working folks, HOAs can be a necessary evil, if we want to buy SOME kind of home. It must be nice to have lots of $$. It is unfortunate that for many, it really warps their comprehension of the reality of life for for regular working folks. That is odd! Here in NC, it is the high end neighborhoods where HOAs are all the rage. Many HOAs seem to exist, in part, to enforce rules where it gives the illusion that no one in the neighborhood must either work for a living or do any personal manual labor (winterize the boat, for example). Its all about keeping you from putting that single wide in the backyard for mama and making sure that you don't have that old Chevy up on blocks in the front yard fro a couple of years. Simply a straw man. Cities and towns have ordinances governing these practices and there really is no need to create an umbrella of civil litigation over the existing laws.... unless you are an attorney, then it probably seems like a great idea! Most covenants are written such that you can keep a boat on the property if it is housed within a garage..... and many covenants prohibit an unattached garage. So.... you can have your boat if you can afford a house/garage big enough to house both. Go figure....... Its all about resale value. I think there is more to it than that. -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
|
#7
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
wrote in message oups.com... I will never understand why anybody would willing sign a document binding themselves and (potentially) their heirs to an "association" which promises all of the restrictions of (yet another layer of) government, but with none of the expected protections. The typical level of intrusion into one's personal life and behavior is, IMHO, absolutely unacceptable! Do you really want to live your life according to a code of behavior that a bunch of busybodies will coercively force on you? ......especially, when *you* didn't sign the document to begin with? Buy your own nonrestricted homestead, then you can store and work on your property as *you* see fit. Invite the GF over to *your* place..... PS You will discover many other benefits and freedoms, as well. You'll be able to leave the toilet seat up, too, if you want to ..... Homeowners Associations are a popular developers/local government scam in Kalifornia and other areas. Basically, the building density can be much higher (more units per acre) and the HOA is responsible for road and drainage maintenance, code enforcement, etc, instead of the town or city. It is a very convenient way for the town/city to absolve themselves for responsibility to maintain the roads, the sewer and drain pipes, and do code enforcement. A very scummy arrangement that is good for the developers and the towns/cities, but really bad for the residents. Your suggestion to buy somewhere that doesn't have an HOA sounds really good, except that most people don't have the money to buy the kind of home they would REALLY like. In other words, not everyone is rich, or lives in an area that the housing cost are reasonable compared to wages. For us working folks, HOAs can be a necessary evil, if we want to buy SOME kind of home. It must be nice to have lots of $$. It is unfortunate that for many, it really warps their comprehension of the reality of life for for regular working folks. We have a HOA in our development. The Association officers are responsible for contracting out the care and upkeep of the main entrance to the development (landscaping and sidewalk snow removal) as well as enforcing Association bylaws. They also review and approve fence and shed installations. Annual cost to each homeowner is $80. Folks purchasing houses in the developement are told up front of the Association and are given a copy of the bylaws. I don't mind it. It helps ensure we don't get junk cars and trailers parked in driveways and eventually adds to the worth of my house. BTW: I can work on or store my boat on the trailer in my driveway for 2 full weeks/year, which is reasonable. |
|
#8
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:54:28 -0400, "JimH" ask penned the
following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: We have a HOA in our development. The Association officers are responsible for contracting out the care and upkeep of the main entrance to the development (landscaping and sidewalk snow removal) as well as enforcing Association bylaws. They also review and approve fence and shed installations. Annual cost to each homeowner is $80. That is pretty cheap compared to most HOAs. Folks purchasing houses in the developement are told up front of the Association and are given a copy of the bylaws. My guess is that nothing is binding, if they didn't also assent to and sign the restrictive covenants prior to purchase. I don't mind it. It helps ensure we don't get junk cars and trailers parked in driveways and eventually adds to the worth of my house. I don't have any of that, now, and I can park my boat in the driveway and work on it whenever and as long as I want..... BTW: I can work on or store my boat on the trailer in my driveway for 2 full weeks/year, which is reasonable. ......which is convenient because if I couldn't, I'd be spending another $75-$350+/month to slip the boat. That makes that $80 look like $155-$430+ to me! -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
|
#9
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Kearns wrote:
My guess is that nothing is binding, if they didn't also assent to and sign the restrictive covenants prior to purchase. I don't know about your state, but in mine it's as binding as any other deed restriction. And deed restrictions are very much binding. Rick |
|
#10
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Kearns wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:54:28 -0400, "JimH" ask penned the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: We have a HOA in our development. The Association officers are responsible for contracting out the care and upkeep of the main entrance to the development (landscaping and sidewalk snow removal) as well as enforcing Association bylaws. They also review and approve fence and shed installations. Annual cost to each homeowner is $80. That is pretty cheap compared to most HOAs. My guess is that nothing is binding, if they didn't also assent to and sign the restrictive covenants prior to purchase. Gene, It is good that you don't live in a community with HOA and restrictive covenants, because you probably would be very surprised how incorrect your guess is. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ALSO YOU MAY SUCK IT! | General | |||
| Well, doesn't individual.net just SUCK. | ASA | |||
| I suck!!! | ASA | |||
| OT's really suck | General | |||
| you all suck | Power Boat Racing | |||