Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Mar 6, 7:39�am, Harry Krause wrote: Vic Smith wrote: On Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:05:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: After wading through many past posts about the MacGregor, among them an excellent �review done by Chuck, according to the salts I will never be sailing on the MacGregor. Hell, I can have the motor hanging lifeless on the transom, 6 feet of dagger board down, 300 sq ft of sail filled with air, and be clipping along at 8 knots or so, but I won't be sailing on the MacGregor. � So that means no work! �Pretty neat (-: It's a terrible boat. Caveat emptor. Harry, as the last sentence of the above para I had written: MacGregors are to "sailors" as Bayliners are to "Krauses." I snipped it. Here you are, so that didn't work. Anyway, thanks for the heads up. �I'm far from sold on it. But if I get one, I sure as hell ain't coming back here. --Vic You probably won't be coming back to shore, either. Make sure you file a float plan.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sounds like Sir Krause of the Bayliner Jousts. You are entitled to your opinion, but you are wrong to state that a MacGregor is a patently unsafe or life threatening choice. Like any boat, it must be used with an eye to the weather. http://img409.imageshack.us/my.php?i...43e174duw8.jpg "See, as you push the water deeper under water it get's less dense and becomes buoyant. Fortunately, water is still heavier than air, otherwise all the buoyant water from the bottom of the ocean would float right up out of the water instead of sinking in the air." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Colvic Sailer 29' 9" Project how much to do it??? (long) | General | |||
260 Defiance, not that dissimilar to a Parker | General | |||
Hull Design & Displacement Hulls | General | |||
Type 2 vs. Type 3 Wire | Electronics |