Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you'll kindly point out where I "defended Chavez", I'd be happy to share my reasoning with you. My primary interest in this discussion is considering the question of whether or not buyng boat fuel at a fuel dock that sells CITGO will result in Venezuela dropping nuclear bombs on the United States. (see original post in the thread) The point I'm trying to make is that it won't make any difference to Chavez, as he can sell the same oil somewhere else. Worse yet, you can pull up to a fuel dock that says BP or ARCO and wind up filling up with CITGO product anyway. Happens all the time, as others have pointed out in this thread. If the United States hopes to be insulated for terrorists from Venezuela, there are a few steps that could be taken. But none of them have anything to do with the purchase of boat fuel and therefore aren't remotely appropriate for this group. |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. Uh, oh. It's the childish JimH. Next will be the lying, nasty to everyone JimH. Classic bipolar!! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
basskisser wrote:
JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message roups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. Uh, oh. It's the childish JimH. Next will be the lying, nasty to everyone JimH. Classic bipolar!! Classic obsession. |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dan Krueger" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. Uh, oh. It's the childish JimH. Next will be the lying, nasty to everyone JimH. Classic bipolar!! Classic obsession. He has either named me in one of his posts or responded directly to me when my post had nothing to with him........at least 2 dozen times today and another 2 dozen yesterday, each time inviting a fight and doing exactly what he accuses me of doing. Funny stuff! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"Dan Krueger" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message egroups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. Uh, oh. It's the childish JimH. Next will be the lying, nasty to everyone JimH. Classic bipolar!! Classic obsession. He has either named me in one of his posts or responded directly to me when my post had nothing to with him........at least 2 dozen times today and another 2 dozen yesterday, each time inviting a fight and doing exactly what he accuses me of doing. Funny stuff! Not funny. It's sad. |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimH wrote: "Dan Krueger" wrote in message ink.net... basskisser wrote: JimH wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message groups.com... JimH wrote: Why do you choose to defend Chavez? Sorry, JimH, but apparently I'm not bright enough to follow along here. If you say so. Uh, oh. It's the childish JimH. Next will be the lying, nasty to everyone JimH. Classic bipolar!! Classic obsession. He has either named me in one of his posts or responded directly to me when my post had nothing to with him........at least 2 dozen times today and another 2 dozen yesterday, each time inviting a fight and doing exactly what he accuses me of doing. Funny stuff! You've proven yourself the lowest of the low lifes. Anyone who would spread lies about someone and their family without any evidence or fact is indeed low. Anyone who would say nasty and untrue things about someone's children is even lower. You did all of the above, didn't you, bipolar boy? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|