Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 May 2006 02:22:04 GMT, Don White wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: What did you sacrifice for your stateside service, Bertie? Your virginity? Doubtful.... heard his S/O complain that he was still holding on for the 'right time'. Don, what does your support of Harry's personal attacks do for you? Until Harry started his foul-mouthed personal attack of Bert, there'd been no name-calling. As soon as Harry does his thing, you chime in with a similar comment. From observation, I know you can be a pretty nice, informative, reasonable person. Yet you follow Harry's example with the personal attack crap. Why? -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#122
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 May 2006 11:14:33 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 08 May 2006 20:36:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: As far as "a call to arms", that's too general a statement. Psychiatrists have numerous terms for those who are OK with killing people for no good reason. Psychopath is one of them. Sometimes Doug you take it too far. If you don't understand the reasoning, then just admit it and shut the **** up. The reasoning, Tom, is that it's your duty to serve, even if the war is clearly a hideous mistake. No questions - just show up and serve. Is that what you don't think I understand? Doug, Tom obviously has more sense than to become 'engaged' with your form of debate. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#123
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Tue, 09 May 2006 11:14:33 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 08 May 2006 20:36:46 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: As far as "a call to arms", that's too general a statement. Psychiatrists have numerous terms for those who are OK with killing people for no good reason. Psychopath is one of them. Sometimes Doug you take it too far. If you don't understand the reasoning, then just admit it and shut the **** up. The reasoning, Tom, is that it's your duty to serve, even if the war is clearly a hideous mistake. No questions - just show up and serve. Is that what you don't think I understand? Doug, Tom obviously has more sense than to become 'engaged' with your form of debate. John H Apparently, your "form of debate" doesn't permit asking questions. If you think about that for a moment, you'll realize that in my paragraph, above, beginning with "The reasoning...", this is exactly what I'm talking about. No questions, NO debate. Just show up and do as you're told. |
#124
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... Doug, today I'm going to make a meat loaf. I'll buy round steak, on sale for $1.99 a pound, half of what good hamburger costs. Then I'll grind it myself. I've wondered what it must be like to get ground up like hamburger. From your reply, above, I surmise that you could tell us! John H Just sit quietly, John. Try not to fall off the chair. Tomorrow, we'll cover benches. To be honest Doug, I really feel badly for you. It must be quite a cross to bear, living the life of a perpetual cynic of everybody else in the world who does not subscribe to your depressing philosophy. There are far more effective ways to cause change than the style you have chosen. And, as one last attempt, don't be so quick to categorically condemn those that served during Vietnam. Many very smart people did so, motivated for reasons that you obviously cannot understand because it's part of a character make-up that you lack. We are not mindless, nor does it necessarily mean we think the war was justified in the end. RCE |
#125
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... Doug, today I'm going to make a meat loaf. I'll buy round steak, on sale for $1.99 a pound, half of what good hamburger costs. Then I'll grind it myself. I've wondered what it must be like to get ground up like hamburger. From your reply, above, I surmise that you could tell us! John H Just sit quietly, John. Try not to fall off the chair. Tomorrow, we'll cover benches. To be honest Doug, I really feel badly for you. It must be quite a cross to bear, living the life of a perpetual cynic of everybody else in the world who does not subscribe to your depressing philosophy. There are far more effective ways to cause change than the style you have chosen. And, as one last attempt, don't be so quick to categorically condemn those that served during Vietnam. Many very smart people did so, motivated for reasons that you obviously cannot understand because it's part of a character make-up that you lack. We are not mindless, nor does it necessarily mean we think the war was justified in the end. RCE This may be simpler than you think. Most parents expect their children to not participate in destructive behaviors with errant friends. Why do you expect them to sidestep this lesson for a war? It really makes no sense whatsoever. Go fight, because if you don't, someone else's kid may have to take your place? That's absurd. |
#126
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JIMinFL" wrote in message .net... http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ers040908.html It is sad to see the way the thread degenerated into name calling and personal attacks Jim. I believe your intentions were honorable when starting it, especially since you and several other members here served our Country honorably. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. ;-) |
#127
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JimH wrote:
"JIMinFL" wrote in message .net... http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...ers040908.html It is sad to see the way the thread degenerated into name calling and personal attacks Jim. I believe your intentions were honorable when starting it, especially since you and several other members here served our Country honorably. Thanks for bringing it to our attention. ;-) Yes it was very helpful to rec.boats for this topic to become the number one topic. We need more OT topics such as this one. -- Reggie That's my story and I am sticking to it. |
#128
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... Doug, today I'm going to make a meat loaf. I'll buy round steak, on sale for $1.99 a pound, half of what good hamburger costs. Then I'll grind it myself. I've wondered what it must be like to get ground up like hamburger. From your reply, above, I surmise that you could tell us! John H Just sit quietly, John. Try not to fall off the chair. Tomorrow, we'll cover benches. To be honest Doug, I really feel badly for you. It must be quite a cross to bear, living the life of a perpetual cynic of everybody else in the world who does not subscribe to your depressing philosophy. There are far more effective ways to cause change than the style you have chosen. And, as one last attempt, don't be so quick to categorically condemn those that served during Vietnam. Many very smart people did so, motivated for reasons that you obviously cannot understand because it's part of a character make-up that you lack. We are not mindless, nor does it necessarily mean we think the war was justified in the end. RCE This may be simpler than you think. Most parents expect their children to not participate in destructive behaviors with errant friends. Why do you expect them to sidestep this lesson for a war? It really makes no sense whatsoever. Go fight, because if you don't, someone else's kid may have to take your place? That's absurd. I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE |
#129
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... Doug, today I'm going to make a meat loaf. I'll buy round steak, on sale for $1.99 a pound, half of what good hamburger costs. Then I'll grind it myself. I've wondered what it must be like to get ground up like hamburger. From your reply, above, I surmise that you could tell us! John H Just sit quietly, John. Try not to fall off the chair. Tomorrow, we'll cover benches. To be honest Doug, I really feel badly for you. It must be quite a cross to bear, living the life of a perpetual cynic of everybody else in the world who does not subscribe to your depressing philosophy. There are far more effective ways to cause change than the style you have chosen. And, as one last attempt, don't be so quick to categorically condemn those that served during Vietnam. Many very smart people did so, motivated for reasons that you obviously cannot understand because it's part of a character make-up that you lack. We are not mindless, nor does it necessarily mean we think the war was justified in the end. RCE This may be simpler than you think. Most parents expect their children to not participate in destructive behaviors with errant friends. Why do you expect them to sidestep this lesson for a war? It really makes no sense whatsoever. Go fight, because if you don't, someone else's kid may have to take your place? That's absurd. I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. |
#130
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 09 May 2006 12:14:28 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "RCE" wrote in message m... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "RCE" wrote in message ... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "JohnH" wrote in message ... Doug, today I'm going to make a meat loaf. I'll buy round steak, on sale for $1.99 a pound, half of what good hamburger costs. Then I'll grind it myself. I've wondered what it must be like to get ground up like hamburger. From your reply, above, I surmise that you could tell us! John H Just sit quietly, John. Try not to fall off the chair. Tomorrow, we'll cover benches. To be honest Doug, I really feel badly for you. It must be quite a cross to bear, living the life of a perpetual cynic of everybody else in the world who does not subscribe to your depressing philosophy. There are far more effective ways to cause change than the style you have chosen. And, as one last attempt, don't be so quick to categorically condemn those that served during Vietnam. Many very smart people did so, motivated for reasons that you obviously cannot understand because it's part of a character make-up that you lack. We are not mindless, nor does it necessarily mean we think the war was justified in the end. RCE This may be simpler than you think. Most parents expect their children to not participate in destructive behaviors with errant friends. Why do you expect them to sidestep this lesson for a war? It really makes no sense whatsoever. Go fight, because if you don't, someone else's kid may have to take your place? That's absurd. I repeat. You cannot understand. But that's ok. It takes all kinds to make the world go around. Subscribe to what you believe in .... if anything .... but please don't condemn those that chose otherwise for their own personal reasons. It does not mean they are bad people. RCE I'm capable of understanding absolutely anything, with no exceptions. In this case, I need an explanation that goes a little further than something resembling religious faith, but I haven't seen it yet. "You serve because it's your duty, no matter WHAT. Period. No questions." If that last statement is wrong, please modify it. You obviously have no idea of the thoughts which go through the mind of those who just received their draft notice. To explain these thoughts and the rationale for serving, would simply provide you with more opportunity to denigrate those who served, for whatever reason. Unless you've been there, and done that, you are *not* capable of understanding. Furthermore, your snide comments and innuendoes prove you have no desire to do so. -- 'Til next time, John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OH MY GOSH! UNBELIEVABLE NEWS!! | General |