| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Diesel Engine Choice?
jps wrote: In article , says... "jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:20:52 -0700 in rec.boats, jps penned the following thoughts: IMHO... 4-cycle, Natural, steel, Piston sleeves Thanks Gene. Which brand? I don't think Cats have sleeves, Cummins are aluminum, Perkins? I know Hino's have sleeves. Any faves? jps At least some of the Volvo's have sleeves. Mine does, but are turbo'd six cylinders. But, a naturally aspirated small diesel is likely to last a long, long time. Replaceable sleeves may not be all that important. At 6000+ hours the original Ford Lehman in my wife's Grand Banks is just broken in according to Bob Smith of American Diesel Corp. RCE I keep hearing that boat hours are different than normal applications-- that'd have diesels running constantly for those long-hour lives. And, that low hour diesels should be gazed upon with suspicion (not that any engine shouldn't be suspect) since infrequent use is not kindly to diesel engine parts. Is this baloney or is there some basis in fact? jps Those engines that run constantly usually get exceptional maintenance. I'm thinking of some of the diesels that run power plants on the north slope, where operating manuals call for a minor overhaul "every 20,000 hours." Run as fast as you can from any used diesel that isn't currently sitting in a boat. There had to be some reason that somebody would go to the expense of removing the engine and replacing it with something else, and you might not find out what the reason was until after you have gone to the expense of paying to have the engine installed in your boat. One of the common rules of thumb (will always come in handy when you're trying to finger something out) is that a 2 to 1 ratio of CID to HP is desirable. My original Perkins was 354 CID and developed 165 HP, so that was a good combo. When that engine bit the dust at right around 4000 hours, it was a failed exhaust manifold rather than internal wear and tear that did it in. My new engine is also 354 CID, develops only 135 HP, and has a FWC exhaust manifold so I don't expect it to let me down again when I get to that 4000 hour figure. You boat on Puget Sound. Where the heck you think you need to go at a blistering speed? Almost nobody but the greenest of peas seriously attempts to do two-day weekends in the San Juans from Seattle or points south. Take my trawler challenge: Get out a paper chart (remember those?) and draw a 32 nm arc around your home port. That's a Saturday morning cruise in a boat that gets 3-4 nmpg. Bet you'll count 20-40 potential ports of call, state parks,cozy anchorages, waterfront bars, and marinas in that space. You could boat every other weekend for a year and never visit the same place twice. :-) Speed is going to cost you, whether gas or diesel. It's that monster speed, not the choice of fuel, that will make boating less than optimally affordably for most people. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Nanni Diesel Engine Problems | General | |||
| reliable diesel engine | General | |||
| WTB: Diesel engine, drop in for AT4 eng. Bed. | Marketplace | |||
| Bleeding a diesel engine | Cruising | |||
| simple diesel engine question | Boat Building | |||
Threaded Mode
