"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have
found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by
publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it
up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity
with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in
the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the
cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of
church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the
Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support,
when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION
that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because
the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the
past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions
are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn
this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is
the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter.
If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in
prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending
the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to
any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the
situation.

Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last
year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those
riots? Yawn.....

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have
found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess
by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of
Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it
up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity
with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in
the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the
cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of
church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the
Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because
the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the
past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two
religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is
the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter.
If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in
prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending
the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object
to any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the
situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's funeral
yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have
found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess
by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of
Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it
up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of
solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious
fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who
published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and
separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks
assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian
shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because
the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the
past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two
religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where
is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped.
I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the
way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make
political hay out of the situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's
funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I
have found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess
by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of
Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take
it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of
solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious
fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who
published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and
separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks
assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian
shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior
because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too
far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The
two religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where
is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped.
I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the
way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make
political hay out of the situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's
funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious.


Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the
Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial?

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I
have found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole
mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch
of Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free
speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that
cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an
image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who?
Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the
morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free
speech and separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim
shmucks assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the
Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior
because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too
far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad.
The two religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where
is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped.
I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by
the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make
political hay out of the situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's
funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious.


Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the
Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial?


No....don't recall that one.

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I
have found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window,
and tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole
mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid
bunch of Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free
speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that
cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates
an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess
who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent
to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either
side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien
concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is
arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves
"support" when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior
because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too
far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad.
The two religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish.
Where is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be
tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish
properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your
president's part to make political hay out of the situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's
funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious.


Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the
Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial service?


No....don't recall that one.


http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLI...orial.fallout/

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
. ..

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I
have found a few ways to support the country.

OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window,
and tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole
mess by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid
bunch of Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free
speech, instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that
cartoon? Take it up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates
an image of solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess
who? Religious fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent
to the morons who published the cartoons. No brains on either
side. Free speech and separation of church & state? Alien
concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the Danish government is
arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves
"support" when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.


i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals

No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior
because the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too
far in the past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad.
The two religions are the same.


yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when
anyone makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not
Christian. Don't turn this around like some Christian newspaper is
targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish.
Where is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be
tapped. I'm not defending the current violence against Danish
properties, by the way. I *do* object to any attempt on your
president's part to make political hay out of the situation.


Sort of like Jimmy Carter and other Democrats did during Mrs. King's
funeral yesterday? What a shameful display on their part.

Yeah, I heard about that. Inexcusable and obnoxious.


Shameful political rally's at funerals and memorials seems to be the
Democrats MO now........remember the Wellstone Memorial service?


No....don't recall that one.


http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLI...orial.fallout/

I guess that makes a trend.

Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have
found a few ways to support the country.
OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess by
publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it
up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of solidarity
with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious fanatics in
the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who published the
cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and separation of
church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks assume that the
Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its support,
when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN PUBLICATION
that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.

i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals
No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because
the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the
past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two religions
are the same.

yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't turn
this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where is
the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't matter.
If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political cartoonists in
prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped. I'm not defending
the current violence against Danish properties, by the way. I *do* object to
any attempt on your president's part to make political hay out of the
situation.

Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last
year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those
riots? Yawn.....


Doug,
I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff
that is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values,
or do you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main
objective is to promote Christianity?

--
Reggie
************************************************** *************
That's my story and I am sticking to it.

************************************************** *************

"Reggie Smithers" wrote in message
. ..
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Dan J.S." wrote in message
...
After reading about Denmark and their problems with the Arabs I have
found a few ways to support the country.
OK....stop the special bus at the next corner, open the window, and
tell me about your delusion:

1) A (typically) stupid Christian publication starts this whole mess
by publishing a picture that offends an (equally) stupid bunch of
Muslims.

2) The Danish government responds by saying it supports free speech,
instead of saying "Hey...you got a problem with that cartoon? Take it
up with these shmucks". By doing so, it creates an image of
solidarity with the shmucks. The audience is...guess who? Religious
fanatics in the Middle East, precisely equivalent to the morons who
published the cartoons. No brains on either side. Free speech and
separation of church & state? Alien concepts. The Muslim shmucks
assume that the Danish government is arm in arm with the Christian
shmucks. Great.

3) The Danish government sees its holdings around the world being
attacked, and you think we should say one friggin' word in its
support, when it could've distanced itself from the PRIVATELY RUN
PUBLICATION that started the mess?

If Forbes Magazine, or Time or Newseek had published the cartoons
first, you would've come up with all sorts of reasons why "it's
different". But, a Christian publication somehow deserves "support"
when its actions generate conflict.

Bull****.

i forgot

islam - new religion of liberals
No, robot. You assume a Christian newspaper is somehow superior because
the details of that religion's sins occurred just a bit too far in the
past to be accurately chronicled by web links. Too bad. The two
religions are the same.

yes, Christians are running around burning down buildings when anyone
makes fun of them. Plus, most of the papers were not Christian. Don't
turn this around like some Christian newspaper is targeting Islam.

How about the daily jew cartoons that Islamic newspaper publish. Where
is the outrage there?

Islamists are idiots.


Perhaps Israelis (and Jews in general) realize that cartoons don't
matter. If they did, there'd be a whole slew of American political
cartoonists in prison by now, or at least their phones would be tapped.
I'm not defending the current violence against Danish properties, by the
way. I *do* object to any attempt on your president's part to make
political hay out of the situation.

Remember when Islamic kids were reenacting the Watts riots in Paris last
year, and how people like NOYB were predicting Armegeddon based on those
riots? Yawn.....
Doug,
I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that
is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do
you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is
to promote Christianity?

Odd question. Statistically speaking, most newspapers in Western countries
will fall into your first category, since most Western countries are largely
Christian. As far as the second category, such publications *do* exist:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Meanwhile:


US, British media tread carefully in cartoon furor

Papers have not reprinted Muhammad caricatures, but support right to publish
them.

By Arthur Bright | csmonitor.com

Protests over 12 cartoons of the prophet Muhammad spread across the Muslim
world over the weekend, as Danish embassies were set on fire in Syria and
Lebanon and at least six people were killed during protests in Afghanistan
and Somalia.
But while the demonstrations were inflamed at least in part by the cartoons'
republishing by newspapers across continental Europe, the media in the
United States have largely abstained from representing the cartoons, citing
them as "too offensive to run," reports Editor and Publisher.

Mo

http://www.christiansciencemonitor.c...ate.html?s=rel

Doug Kanter wrote:

Doug,
I am curious, do you mean the newspaper is run by an editorial staff that
is comprised mostly of those who believe in Judah/Christian values, or do
you mean the newspaper is run by an organization whose main objective is
to promote Christianity?

Odd question. Statistically speaking, most newspapers in Western countries
will fall into your first category, since most Western countries are largely
Christian. As far as the second category, such publications *do* exist:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...=Google+Search

Yes, I know most newspapers run in Western countries fall into the first
category, and yes I know there are newspapers that fall into the 2nd
category.

My question to you was "when you said it a "Christian Newspaper" what
category were you using to label the newspaper a "Christian newspaper".


--
Reggie
************************************************** *************
That's my story and I am sticking to it.

************************************************** *************