Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#72
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:22:36 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Exxon receives less profit from the sale of a gallon of gas than government gets in taxes. And the Exxon Valdez disaster really was "good" for the environment. ========================= Non sequitur. You disappoint me Harry. |
#73
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
|
#74
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:02:32 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: A much stronger car of the 1960s...a TR4A-IRS. I had one of those, too. Great car. Not nearly as pretty as the MGA, but...it ran and ran and ran. Always wanted a red 'Healy 3000 from that era. |
#75
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
Harry Krause wrote:
Fred Dehl wrote: Illiterate asshole, Read the post again. Do you know what the **** a "profit margin" is? God you're the stupidest sack of **** in the world. Uh, Fred, you're not in your kitchen here. Try to control your foul mouth. Thanks. I doubt his mommy would let him talk that way at home..... at least not without a cake of soap to clean up afterwards. |
#76
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
|
#77
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
jps wrote:
In article , says... " JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in news And folks can choose to stop buying newspapers. Not true of gasoline. Bull****, asswipe. JohnH, are you going to step in here to calm this peckerhead down? Why is it that you're so quick to offer the preamble to the left and not so quick in name-callers like this. For Christ's sake, he just called JimH a faggot treehugger. I just about fell out my chair!!! jps Yes...never a netcop around when you need one! |
#78
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
That's a nice theory.
However, as DSK pointed out, shareholders haven't been substantially rewarded for the climb in profits. RCE wrote: Higher profits usually produce higher stock prices. Few public companies pay dividends anymore. It's all in the stock price. Actually, that's not true. It was true that many investors... and many 'investment writers' widely published... back in the late 1990s were loudly disdainful of dividends. Nowadays investors are very definitely interested in dividends, and the stock-touters talk about them a lot. I am not saying it's right - I am just saying it's the way it is. Maybe we follow very different segments of the financial news media. ... A CEO that does not show bottom line growth ain't gonna be a CEO for long. Well, no. He pockets his $50 million and saunters off stage left, whistling a happy tune. And his platinum parachute is paid for by the employees & common stockholders. It's the new corporate kleptocracy... profits are irrelevant. .... And although publicly reported quarterly, most large companies now report monthly and even weekly, internally. That's why I don't work for one anymore. And the auditors have become paid consultants on how to cheat. Did you notice that Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling might actually have a court date? Good thing the Bush Administration is really cracking down on corporate malfeasance... how many years has it been now? But I digress.... I own several oil company stocks, and the neither dividends nor price appreciation has not followed reported profits... yet... Regards Doug King |
#79
posted to rec.boats,alt.autos.ford
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
Wayne.B wrote:
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 01:34:02 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing wrote: My truck has over 100k and the town car is approaching 100k - that little escort i bought to keep the gas milage down is over 100k - 115k in fact. 100k is nothing nowadays. That's true if you buy the right vehicle. Absolutely! My youngest son is now driving the Camry that I bought new in 1992. It is at almost 200K miles and still going strong in NYC traffic and roads. Rust will consume that car before wear & tear. My wife's Honda Accord is over 100K miles and still runs like new. It'd better. It's not even broken in yet. On the other hand our 1991 Dodge Caravan had trim falling off of it by 50,000 miles, 3 transmissions, all new brakes and a radiator by 70,000. It was getting too unreliable to keep, and it will be a long time before we buy another Chrysler product. I'd rather spend my money on boats. (on topic) That was a real junky vehicle. Like you said, it's got to be the right vehicle. Ford has been doing a much better job than GM on the whole since ~1996 when the G2 Taurus & the 3.8 V-6 combination was laid to rest after 1995. Problems with that platform came back to haunt the WindStar for a while, but they were ironed out. A lot of GM troubles are around their commitment to DexCool. Between poorly designed & built gaskets, that stuff is just bad news... Despite a crazy number of recalls, the Focus is holding up well. I would buy a used 3.0 Taurus/Sable or any Crown/Marquis, or 2005-up Mustang, in a second and expect 300,000 miles if the rust can be avoided. And Fords & GMs are cheaper to fix, easier to work on. And I like boats better too, but my newest (power)boat is a 1973, sailboat is a 1979. They are holding up very well. Both are domestic makes. I'd never buy a Toyota boat. Yamaha, maybe! (They own several brands). Rob |
#80
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
Affording Fuel
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General | |||
Do Gas Stations in New Jersey Have Fuel That Has Alcohol Additives? | General | |||
Engine starving for fuel? | General | |||
Gas Hog Cars, same phenomenon as boats | General | |||
How Exactly Do We Mix Oil With Fuel? | General |