Harry,

Publish a verifiable picture of your Lobster Boat, and I will answer all
questions you posted previously.

Since you are a slow learning, this is an actual counter offer verses a
question inquiring what information you request to know.

I hope everyone realizes how dangerous it is to give a lunatic any personal
information. The only reason I would make a counter offer, is I know there
is no Lobster Boat.

..


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry,
I didn't volunteer to answer any of your questions.

Smithers is a cowardly, lying, weaseling assho*le, *exactly* as I have
been stating here for a long, long time, and his latest rationalization
isn't working, except, perhaps, on his fellow weasels.






--
Remove Bush's Feeding Tube!

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:15:10 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

John H. wrote:
Harry, where did Smithers volunteer to answer questions? Asking you what you want to know about him
does not say he will *tell* you. He was seeking information, you provided it. He said he'd reply to
you by email. He did so. He asked you some questions. You've not answered them.

Where's the foul play here?

You mean the foul smell?
It's that lying, cowardly weasel, Smithers.

Hey...he's one of your boys, so you're posting exactly what one expect
from someone like you.

And Smithers offered up exactly what I expected him to offer.

Right? Right.

And, of course, you need to maintain your position as the chief
facilitator of anyone you believe gives me grief.

Right? Right.

After all, what else is a retired field-grade officer good for?

Harry, you got hooked bad. I'm sorry for you. But, that's the best I can do. You proclaim yourself
to be an expert on word usage. Well, Smithers used some words that were clear. You assumed something
else.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

LOL, Harry please let me know before you freak out like this. I was
drinking a cup of coffee and it went flying all over the place.

You are way too funny.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry,

Publish a verifiable picture of your Lobster Boat, and I will answer all
questions you posted previously.


Liar, liar, pants on fire.


--
God bless our troops; God forgive George W. Bush.

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:19:56 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

JimH wrote:
"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:51:23 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JimH wrote:
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after
he took you up on it.


That's because he's a coward, as I have been suggesting.
No, Jim was mistaken. Smithers did not say he would post whatever
information you requested. He said
to ask him anything you desired.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!



Oh my.




Well, one would expect Herring to wipe and then cover Smithers' butt.

Show me where he said he would answer *any* question of yours. Do that and I'll ask him to respect
his statement, just as I did JimH. Why would I cover one butt and not the other?
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:32:49 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.





You're welcome to come by my house, break in and try to do something
about it, Bert.
BTW, I'm not whining about Smithers not playing fair. I never expected
him to honor his word.
I'm merely pointing that he's a lying, cowardly weasel.

I suppose, Harry, you will turn this around and somehow call it a threat, as you did with Tuuk.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:52:55 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry,
What do you want to know?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.




You're welcome to come by my house, break in and try to do something about
it, Bert.
BTW, I'm not whining about Smithers not playing fair. I never expected him
to honor his word.
I'm merely pointing that he's a lying, cowardly weasel.



Smithers is a cowardly, lying, weaseling assho*le, *exactly* as I have
been stating here for a long, long time, and his latest rationalization
isn't working, except, perhaps, on his fellow weasels.

Show us, Harry. Put his post up here. Surely you can find one that says he'll answer your questions
(if he said such).
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:49:12 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry,
Can you show me one post where I volunteered to give you any information?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said
"What would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email". I
never made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.


" JimH" wrote in message
...
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after he took you up on it.

You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of "made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.


Smithers is a cowardly, lying, weaseling assho*le, *exactly* as I have
been stating here for a long, long time, and his latest rationalization
isn't working, except, perhaps, on his fellow weasels.

Uh, Harry, you're being repetitive. Show us the post, Harry.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!

The Lord Smithers is very sharp with his words

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:46:45 -0500, " JimH" wrote:


"Lord Reginald Smithers" The fastest and most accurate Gun in the
World
wrote in message ...
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said
"What
would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email". I
never
made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.



I did not see it that way.


I think he was watching his words most carefully.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!

Lord Smithers plays harry likee a violin
"John H." wrote in message
...
Harry, where did Smithers volunteer to answer questions? Asking you what
you want to know about him
does not say he will *tell* you. He was seeking information, you
provided it. He said he'd reply to
you by email. He did so. He asked you some questions. You've not
answered them.

Where's the foul play here?



On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:50:52 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
PS - Harry, I will post all pertinent personal info as soon as you
publish a
picture of you and your Lobster Boat.

You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of
"made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.

--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
...and your New Year even Better!

Starting????? surely you jest.

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
Would you grow up and stop crying about others not playing fair.

You really are starting act like a whiney little bitch.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
JimH,
I did not say I would post whatever information Harry asked. I said
"What would you like to know" and then said " I will reply by email".
I
never made an offer, nor did I renege on an offer.


" JimH" wrote in message
...
In all fairness Smithers.........you said you would post whatever
information Harry asked you to but you are now reneging on the offer
after he took you up on it.



You're a lying coward, Smithers.
In several recent postings here, "Smithers" volunteered to answer some
questions:
To wit:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:

What would you like to know?

To which I responded:

Your real name
The email account your ISP assigned you
The metro area in which you live
Your age
What you do for a living (where you work is no one's business)
Your wife's name
The brand, style and model of boat you have, and other boats you have
owned
Where you boat
How you identified yourself here prior to the endless series of
"made-up"
names you've been using

And a personal family history, with interesting anecdotal information,
of at least 500 words.

Oh, verifiable information, of course. We'll see how the comparison
matches up.

I did not ask for his street address, the name of his employer, his
telephone number,
et cetera.


Smithers responded:

Harry,
I will reply via email.

Here's the email Smithers sent:

"Harry,

It is nice to see you have a long list of questions.

Before I answer your questions, please provide me with an answer to the
following questions.

1. What is your home address.
2. What is your home telephone.
3. Why did you find it necessary to make up details concerning your
wife's education and where you obtained your degree from?
4. Were your parents too strict when you were growing up? Did you
feel
loved as a child?

I look forward to your answer.

Joe"


I actually won a minor bet over Smithers' response. Another poster
emailed me that Smithers sounded "sincere," and I bet him that all that
would be forthcoming was more Smithersh*t. I won. The bet: a brand-new,
$5 or less fishing lure.

And, as I have stated previously, Smithers is a coward. Still.






--
Abstinence-only sex education=Ignorance-only sex education.