Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?
Isn't everyone suppose to be happy?
Where are the free croissants?

"Sammy" wrote in message
news:WJ3cf.13179$dU6.5143@trnddc03...
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?
Isn't everyone suppose to be happy?
Where are the free croissants?




Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?

Sammy wrote:
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?


Nah. It's just not moved to a designated "protest zone" where the high
rollin' elite and right wing political candidates don't have to see it.

Don't forget what that old communist, Thomas Jefferson, preached. Every
so often it is healthy for the people to rise up, take control of, and
reform the government. We may be seeing the beginnings of that process
in France, and that should make all the "We-hate-France-because-the
French-didn't-fall-for-the-WMD-propaganda-and-join-the-invasion-of-Iraq"
crowd extremely happy.

Dan J.S. wrote:
"Sammy" wrote in message
news:WJ3cf.13179$dU6.5143@trnddc03...
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?
Isn't everyone suppose to be happy?
Where are the free croissants?




Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?

The Muslims need no defense.

When some African Americans rioted after the Rodney King situation, did
you hold all African Americans responsible?

When Timothy McVeigh blew up the OKC office building, did you hold all
Irish Americans responsible?

If the answers to those items are both "no", then surely there would be
no tendency to condemn Islam in general for the anti-social actions of
a small percentage of Muslims.

Besides, any defense would be wasted on somebody who thought (or
attempted to think) in such broad stereotypes that he/she held all of
Islam responsible for the actions of a few.

wrote:

Sammy wrote:
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?

Nah. It's just not moved to a designated "protest zone" where the high
rollin' elite and right wing political candidates don't have to see it.

Don't forget what that old communist, Thomas Jefferson, preached. Every
so often it is healthy for the people to rise up, take control of, and
reform the government.

One wonders what certain unscrupulous French used car salesmen think
while watching thousands of cars burn in the street.

--
Skipper

Dan J.S. wrote:
Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?


yeah, we should just exterminate the pesky little *******s! if it wasn't
for those libby-rull traitors, we'd have Muslims in concentraion camps
by now!

DSK

wrote in message
ups.com...

Dan J.S. wrote:
"Sammy" wrote in message
news:WJ3cf.13179$dU6.5143@trnddc03...
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?
Isn't everyone suppose to be happy?
Where are the free croissants?




Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?

The Muslims need no defense.

When some African Americans rioted after the Rodney King situation, did
you hold all African Americans responsible?

When Timothy McVeigh blew up the OKC office building, did you hold all
Irish Americans responsible?

If the answers to those items are both "no", then surely there would be
no tendency to condemn Islam in general for the anti-social actions of
a small percentage of Muslims.

Besides, any defense would be wasted on somebody who thought (or
attempted to think) in such broad stereotypes that he/she held all of
Islam responsible for the actions of a few.


Unfortunately in the case of Muslims, it is all of them. They made it clear
that they want to associate themselves by religion, not country or heritage.
This religion preaches hatred through the clerics that are positioned all
over the world. This is not a game. Further more, Blacks, Irish, others,
assimilate themselves into the over all culture. Muslims chose not to. In
1600s Europe almost lost it all to Muslims - if it would not be for King
Sobieski most of us right now would be muslim.

"DSK" wrote in message
news
Dan J.S. wrote:
Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?

yeah, we should just exterminate the pesky little *******s! if it wasn't
for those libby-rull traitors, we'd have Muslims in concentraion camps by
now!

DSK


Where they belong! Unless they want to assimilate into our culture...

wrote in message
ps.com...

Sammy wrote:
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?


Nah. It's just not moved to a designated "protest zone" where the high
rollin' elite and right wing political candidates don't have to see it.

Don't forget what that old communist, Thomas Jefferson, preached. Every
so often it is healthy for the people to rise up, take control of, and
reform the government. We may be seeing the beginnings of that process
in France, and that should make all the "We-hate-France-because-the
French-didn't-fall-for-the-WMD-propaganda-and-join-the-invasion-of-Iraq"
crowd extremely happy.


It worked really well when the Arabs burned down half of Europe in the
1600s... ****ing idiot!

You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.

Dan J.S. wrote:
It worked really well when the Arabs burned down half of Europe in the
1600s... ****ing idiot!


???

Could you explain when & where this happened, please?


You have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.


Possibly, but I certainly don't have any idea what you are talking about.

DSK