wrote in message
ups.com...

Dan J.S. wrote:
"Sammy" wrote in message
news:WJ3cf.13179$dU6.5143@trnddc03...
Wow, I thought social unrest was impossible under democratic socialism?
Isn't everyone suppose to be happy?
Where are the free croissants?




Where are the liberals defending the Muslims now?

The Muslims need no defense.

When some African Americans rioted after the Rodney King situation, did
you hold all African Americans responsible?

When Timothy McVeigh blew up the OKC office building, did you hold all
Irish Americans responsible?

If the answers to those items are both "no", then surely there would be
no tendency to condemn Islam in general for the anti-social actions of
a small percentage of Muslims.

Besides, any defense would be wasted on somebody who thought (or
attempted to think) in such broad stereotypes that he/she held all of
Islam responsible for the actions of a few.


Unfortunately in the case of Muslims, it is all of them. They made it clear
that they want to associate themselves by religion, not country or heritage.
This religion preaches hatred through the clerics that are positioned all
over the world. This is not a game. Further more, Blacks, Irish, others,
assimilate themselves into the over all culture. Muslims chose not to. In
1600s Europe almost lost it all to Muslims - if it would not be for King
Sobieski most of us right now would be muslim.