Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anybody else notice that OT threads are running at a multiple of about
4 times the on-topic threads? That's without even beginning to consider the posts. "Liberals are Faggots" or "Bush is Retarded" threads often get over 100 posts, while most boating related items are over and out with 3-6 responses. When posts are considered, we could easily be 150-200 to one, (off-topic to on). Don't know what to do, or if anything should or could be done. Not saying I haven't contributed to the noise myself. But in case nobody else has noticed, as a group I think we're the worst we have ever been. And that's no small accomplishment, considering history. :-( |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does this thread of yours go into the "signal" or "noise" classification?
wrote in message oups.com... Anybody else notice that OT threads are running at a multiple of about 4 times the on-topic threads? That's without even beginning to consider the posts. "Liberals are Faggots" or "Bush is Retarded" threads often get over 100 posts, while most boating related items are over and out with 3-6 responses. When posts are considered, we could easily be 150-200 to one, (off-topic to on). Don't know what to do, or if anything should or could be done. Not saying I haven't contributed to the noise myself. But in case nobody else has noticed, as a group I think we're the worst we have ever been. And that's no small accomplishment, considering history. :-( |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() NOYB wrote: Does this thread of yours go into the "signal" or "noise" classification? Noise NOYB. This one of mine, some others of mine, and virtually all of yours. Purely useless, OT noisemakers we are. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Skipper wrote: wrote: NOYB wrote: Does this thread of yours go into the "signal" or "noise" classification? Noise NOYB. This one of mine, some others of mine, and virtually all of yours. Purely useless, OT noisemakers we are. Calling a spade a spade, this NG is history due to OT abuse by Harry Krause and his Looney Left buds. They turned this once great NG into the political and personal attack slime pit it has become. I count YOU as one of the worst offenders, Chuck Gould. You could have done better. It ain't going back to what it once was. Stop your pompous bitchin' and get with the program. That's a rather insightful (maybe even inciteful) comment Psuedo. At least you have abandoned any pretense of meaningful discussion about boats or boating and declare that the new "program" is a "slime pit" of politics and personal attack. One question; who named you Program Chairman? -- Skipper |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... Anybody else notice that OT threads are running at a multiple of about 4 times the on-topic threads? snip Not saying I haven't contributed to the noise myself. Yep. Lead by example Chuck. Until then, stop the whining. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Anybody else notice that OT threads are running at a multiple of about 4 times the on-topic threads? snip Not saying I haven't contributed to the noise myself. Yep. Lead by example Chuck. Until then, stop the whining. It's not my job to lead. It's a comment, not a whine. There is almost *no* boating content in the NG, at all. At least you and I have boats and therefore have some opportunity to discuss same. As you know, some of the most prolific posters here are not boaters and are simply here to troll. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck,
How do you know the most prolific posters are not boaters? Who in rec.boats is not a boater? The only person I know who sold his boat was JimH, and even when he didn't own a boat, he was still a boater. Since JimH has purchased a new runabout, he not only is a boater, but he is a boat owner. I know many CGAUX members who don't own boats, but they are definitely boaters. Harry is definitely one of the most prolific posters, but I for one believe he owns a nice Parker. He may not use it much, but I really think he owns one. Just because he fabricated a story about a Zimmerman style Lobster Boat does not mean he is not a boater. wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Anybody else notice that OT threads are running at a multiple of about 4 times the on-topic threads? snip Not saying I haven't contributed to the noise myself. Yep. Lead by example Chuck. Until then, stop the whining. It's not my job to lead. It's a comment, not a whine. There is almost *no* boating content in the NG, at all. At least you and I have boats and therefore have some opportunity to discuss same. As you know, some of the most prolific posters here are not boaters and are simply here to troll. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Smith Smithers wrote: Chuck, How do you know the most prolific posters are not boaters? Who in rec.boats is not a boater? The only person I know who sold his boat was JimH, and even when he didn't own a boat, he was still a boater. Since JimH has purchased a new runabout, he not only is a boater, but he is a boat owner. I know many CGAUX members who don't own boats, but they are definitely boaters. Harry is definitely one of the most prolific posters, but I for one believe he owns a nice Parker. He may not use it much, but I really think he owns one. Just because he fabricated a story about a Zimmerman style Lobster Boat does not mean he is not a boater. You use your boat as a "floating condo", an indication that it seldom if ever leaves the dock. You can be a boat owner, without being a boater. Some of these guys may have some little aluminum row boat slowly being engulfed by the berry vines out behind the woodshed- sorry, but they're not boaters either. Here's a good clue to sleuth out the non-boaters: Look for a group of people who virtually never participate in a boating thread regardless of content, or, when they do participate, do so by waiting for somebody of the "incorrect" political spectrum to make a comment and then change the header and respond with personal attack and political opinion. If you can't spot that behavior here, you'd need Lasik to compete with Mr. Magoo. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|