"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
ink.net...
*JimH* wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:

Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to
spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

Oh fer krissake. You're like a broken record.
In the interest of putting this to rest:

I apologize to JimH for publicly voicing my sincere conclusion that the
exceptionally unique and identical styles employed by his attack post
and a recent attack post from "Skipper" indicated his probable
authorship of both attack posts.

There you go. That's one post beyond the point where I mentally plonked
your arse. I can't imagine why you would value an apology from a person
for whom you have lost all respect Don't expect any additional
attention to your silly personal fixation or our mutual disdain. It's
embarrassing to use the NG for personal feuds. Take that up with Harry,
Bass, or one of your other customary targets. I'm going to resist
responding to future pesonal provocations- it's a worthy goal, let's
see how well I do. :-)



As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man
Chuck Gould.
Get over it. I was old 30 posts ago.

No, I won't get over it. Chuck was not man enough to offer an apology after
he lied about me. It is something I will always remember.