PING: Chuck Gould. Still waiting for a direct apology to me from you
 

Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

*JimH* wrote:
Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

Oh fer krissake. You're like a broken record.
In the interest of putting this to rest:

I apologize to JimH for publicly voicing my sincere conclusion that the
exceptionally unique and identical styles employed by his attack post
and a recent attack post from "Skipper" indicated his probable
authorship of both attack posts.

There you go. That's one post beyond the point where I mentally plonked
your arse. I can't imagine why you would value an apology from a person
for whom you have lost all respect Don't expect any additional
attention to your silly personal fixation or our mutual disdain. It's
embarrassing to use the NG for personal feuds. Take that up with Harry,
Bass, or one of your other customary targets. I'm going to resist
responding to future pesonal provocations- it's a worthy goal, let's
see how well I do. :-)

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

Oh fer krissake. You're like a broken record.
In the interest of putting this to rest:

I apologize to JimH for publicly voicing my sincere conclusion that the
exceptionally unique and identical styles employed by his attack post
and a recent attack post from "Skipper" indicated his probable
authorship of both attack posts.

There you go. That's one post beyond the point where I mentally plonked
your arse. I can't imagine why you would value an apology from a person
for whom you have lost all respect Don't expect any additional
attention to your silly personal fixation or our mutual disdain. It's
embarrassing to use the NG for personal feuds. Take that up with Harry,
Bass, or one of your other customary targets. I'm going to resist
responding to future pesonal provocations- it's a worthy goal, let's
see how well I do. :-)


As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man Chuck
Gould.

*JimH* wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:

Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

Oh fer krissake. You're like a broken record.
In the interest of putting this to rest:

I apologize to JimH for publicly voicing my sincere conclusion that the
exceptionally unique and identical styles employed by his attack post
and a recent attack post from "Skipper" indicated his probable
authorship of both attack posts.

There you go. That's one post beyond the point where I mentally plonked
your arse. I can't imagine why you would value an apology from a person
for whom you have lost all respect Don't expect any additional
attention to your silly personal fixation or our mutual disdain. It's
embarrassing to use the NG for personal feuds. Take that up with Harry,
Bass, or one of your other customary targets. I'm going to resist
responding to future pesonal provocations- it's a worthy goal, let's
see how well I do. :-)



As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man Chuck
Gould.


Get over it. I was old 30 posts ago.

"Dan Krueger" wrote in message
ink.net...
*JimH* wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...

*JimH* wrote:

Is a direct apology to me from you coming Chuck, or are you going to
spin
out of this one with an "Apology to the Group"?

Are you man enough Chuck?

Oh fer krissake. You're like a broken record.
In the interest of putting this to rest:

I apologize to JimH for publicly voicing my sincere conclusion that the
exceptionally unique and identical styles employed by his attack post
and a recent attack post from "Skipper" indicated his probable
authorship of both attack posts.

There you go. That's one post beyond the point where I mentally plonked
your arse. I can't imagine why you would value an apology from a person
for whom you have lost all respect Don't expect any additional
attention to your silly personal fixation or our mutual disdain. It's
embarrassing to use the NG for personal feuds. Take that up with Harry,
Bass, or one of your other customary targets. I'm going to resist
responding to future pesonal provocations- it's a worthy goal, let's
see how well I do. :-)



As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man
Chuck Gould.
Get over it. I was old 30 posts ago.

No, I won't get over it. Chuck was not man enough to offer an apology after
he lied about me. It is something I will always remember.

*JimH* wrote:

As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man Chuck
Gould.

Are you man enough to apoligize for YOUR lies, JimH? You may want to
start with the lie about how you were not going to post OT to this
newsgroup anymore. Or, you could start with the lie about not being
mean spirited to anyone here anymore. OR, you could start with the lie
about not calling people names anymore. Or, you could apologize for
calling me someone I'm not. Are you man enough?

*JimH* wrote:



As suspected. You cannot offer a sincere apology. You are not a man
Chuck Gould.

Get over it. It was old 30 posts ago.


No, I won't get over it. Chuck was not man enough to offer an apology after
he lied about me. It is something I will always remember.


Four minutes to respond? Jim, you must refresh this NG every 30 seconds!

You can always remember it forever if that's what you want to do but
this isn't a matter of two buddies having a drink. This is an internet
discussion group originally developed to discuss boating, not he said -
she said BS.

You should read this again...

"Chuck was not man enough to offer an apology after he lied about me.
It is something I will always remember."

Sounds a bit like high school, don't you think?

Dan