| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message . com... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. NOT similar, you ignorant ass. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Hey Hairball, Kerry is a Joke | General | |||
| OT Hanoi John Kerry | General | |||
| OT Kerry: Poodle for Rich Women | General | |||
| ) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
| Help, Harry, I don't understand (little OT) | General | |||
Threaded Mode
