"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
m...


In article
.net,
says...


Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that
the

18-29


year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the
answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between
the

ages

of 18


to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War
II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors

and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when
sending
our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy
like

me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed
President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.
OK.

Got

it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out
of

baking

powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing

next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different

one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the
various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations
of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand
from
your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as
quoted
by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with
Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to
prepare
for a
state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very
least,
know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?


Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and
laid.


Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton
probably
has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip
to Moscow at the same time





Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)