"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"P.Fritz" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Doug Kanter wrote:


"jim--" wrote in message
...


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:



"jps" wrote in message
t.com...



In article

.net,

says...



Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that

the

18-29



year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the

answer

"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between

the

ages


of 18



to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War

II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school

seniors


and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when

sending

our

kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy

like

me."


So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed

President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.

OK.

Got


it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out

of

baking


powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while

standing


next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a

different


one.


Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the

various

countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations

of,

say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.




"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand

from

your

foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as

quoted

by

Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with

Janez

Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to

prepare

for a

state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very

least,

know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho?



Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled
president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside
the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and

laid.

Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton

probably

has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though.

Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when
avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest
trip
to Moscow at the same time




Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been
difficult for him otherwise. ;-)



Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar.

And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA.