"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"jim--" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:

"jps" wrote in message
...

In article .net,
says...

Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that
the

18-29

year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer
"why":


"A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the
ages

of 18

to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War
II."

Democrats. The party for the uninformed.

The leader of your party is less informed than many high school
seniors
and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending
our
kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims.

Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like
me."

So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed
President?

Duh.


They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII.
OK.
Got
it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of
baking
powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list.

I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while
standing
next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a
different
one.



Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various
countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of,
say, 20 countries...couldn't.

Just your opinion....certainly not fact though.



"The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from
your
foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by
Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez
Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia.

ROFL!!!!!!!!



1999? How can Bush be blamed for something that happened while Clinton was
President? ;-)