"Jack Goff" wrote in message
m...

"bomar" wrote in message
...
In this situation heat is probably out of question...
so-
KROIL.
A little had to find, but works wonders.
If not that, PB Blaster (most parts stores)
WD 40 is WORTHLESS for this.


www.kanolabs.com manufactures and sells Kroil and their other products
direct from their website.

Jack

Good stuff, but there is better-
http://corrosionx.com/

Also Sprach Joe :

"Jack Goff" wrote in message
m...

"bomar" wrote in message
...
In this situation heat is probably out of question...
so-
KROIL.
A little had to find, but works wonders.
If not that, PB Blaster (most parts stores)
WD 40 is WORTHLESS for this.


www.kanolabs.com manufactures and sells Kroil and their other products
direct from their website.

Jack

Good stuff, but there is better-
http://corrosionx.com/

Corrosion-X is a fine, but messy preventative, but a **** poor
penetrant. Kroil is a fine penenetrant, but there is one even
better. http//www.mousemilk.com/ Ask any experienced A&P mechanic.

Dan

--

"If not stopped, the 21 million-plus and growing (Napster & Gnutella)
community could usher in a cultural apocalypse that threatens to plunge
the world into darkness not seen since the turn of the last millennium."

-Richard Parsons, AOL-Time Warner executive

"Joe" wrote in message ...
"Jack Goff" wrote in message
m...

"bomar" wrote in message
...
In this situation heat is probably out of question...
so-
KROIL.
A little had to find, but works wonders.
If not that, PB Blaster (most parts stores)
WD 40 is WORTHLESS for this.


www.kanolabs.com manufactures and sells Kroil and their other products
direct from their website.

Jack

Good stuff, but there is better-
http://corrosionx.com/


Tell us, JoeTechnician, what proof do you have that Corrosion X is
better than Kroil? Or is it just another of your absurd opinions?

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Tell us, JoeTechnician, what proof do you have that Corrosion X is
better than Kroil? Or is it just another of your absurd opinions?


Aside from the first hand experience I have had with each, there are some
important physical properties of CorrosionX that make it superior to Kroil.
I will be more than happy to list these properties for you. I will however
only give you one at a time to see how well you process the information.
In the unlikely event you show *any* ability to comprehend I will follow up
with others.

Here it goes-

#1, CorrosionX is a dielectric lubricant/protectant, Kroil is not.

"Joe" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Tell us, JoeTechnician, what proof do you have that Corrosion X is
better than Kroil? Or is it just another of your absurd opinions?


Aside from the first hand experience I have had with each, there are some
important physical properties of CorrosionX that make it superior to Kroil.
I will be more than happy to list these properties for you. I will however
only give you one at a time to see how well you process the information.
In the unlikely event you show *any* ability to comprehend I will follow up
with others.

Here it goes-

#1, CorrosionX is a dielectric lubricant/protectant, Kroil is not.

Hmm, did the poster say that he needed a dielectric lubricant? I
didn't see that listed as his requirements. Please, go on.

"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Joe" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...

Tell us, JoeTechnician, what proof do you have that Corrosion X is
better than Kroil? Or is it just another of your absurd opinions?


Aside from the first hand experience I have had with each, there are
some
important physical properties of CorrosionX that make it superior to
Kroil.
I will be more than happy to list these properties for you. I will
however
only give you one at a time to see how well you process the information.
In the unlikely event you show *any* ability to comprehend I will follow
up
with others.

Here it goes-

#1, CorrosionX is a dielectric lubricant/protectant, Kroil is not.

Hmm, did the poster say that he needed a dielectric lubricant? I
didn't see that listed as his requirements. Please, go on.

Nope.
You first have prove to me that you understand why a dielectric
penetrant/lubricant/protectant is superior to a non-dielectric.

On 11 Jun 2004 05:45:06 -0700, (basskisser) wrote:



Hmm, did the poster say that he needed a dielectric lubricant? I
didn't see that listed as his requirements. Please, go on.

http://maddox.xmission.com/dip****.html
http://www.bartleby.com/61/22/D0242250.html
John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!