Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Harry,
I noticed you ignored the issue of "inflation tax" and the damage it does to those who can least afford a new tax. This is the most repressive tax of all. The working class do not pay the tax, they receive salary increases to offset inflation, those on fixed income pay the tax. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... P Fritz wrote: "Starbuck" wrote in message ... The problem with raising salaries without an increase in productivity is it places a "inflation tax" on those who can least afford the tax, those on a fixed income. I am sure many in here can remember the stories during the 80's when we had 17% inflation and the elderly were eating dog food because that is all they could afford. The unions won't care since they are the least likely group ever to pay union dues in the future, the the liebral socialist democrats would rather coddle the up and coming potential voters than those that will only be around for one or two more election cycles. Wow...you really truly do have crap for brains, Fritz. No wonder your wife divorced you. "The unions won't care since they are the least likely group ever to pay union dues..." What, exactly, does that sentence mean, Fritz? Well, enough for now. It's time for breakfast. I'll contemplate your bizarre sentence for a moment or two. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Starbuck" wrote in message ... Harry, I noticed you ignored the issue of "inflation tax" and the damage it does to those who can least afford a new tax. This is the most repressive tax of all. The working class do not pay the tax, they receive salary increases to offset inflation, those on fixed income pay the tax. harry always ignores the issues in favor of throwing perosnal insults.........because he wouldn't know an issue if it bitch slapped him in the head..............beside the fact he can seem to follow a simple thread. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... P Fritz wrote: "Starbuck" wrote in message ... The problem with raising salaries without an increase in productivity is it places a "inflation tax" on those who can least afford the tax, those on a fixed income. I am sure many in here can remember the stories during the 80's when we had 17% inflation and the elderly were eating dog food because that is all they could afford. The unions won't care since they are the least likely group ever to pay union dues in the future, the the liebral socialist democrats would rather coddle the up and coming potential voters than those that will only be around for one or two more election cycles. Wow...you really truly do have crap for brains, Fritz. No wonder your wife divorced you. "The unions won't care since they are the least likely group ever to pay union dues..." What, exactly, does that sentence mean, Fritz? Well, enough for now. It's time for breakfast. I'll contemplate your bizarre sentence for a moment or two. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Housing for the Katrina Homeless | General | |||
OT) Rice ignored direct warning | General | |||
Ping Pong Balls - Conclusion | Boat Building | |||
Mechanics / Boat Savy: Exhaust Manifold & Thermostat Housing | General | |||
Confused by OMC 4.3L thermostat housing | General |