( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
That explains why women with more years of education are more likely to
support pro-choice candidates.


NOYB wrote:
And men with more years of education are more likely to vote Republican.

??? And here I thought that all the geeky Ph.D ivery-tower types were
the last bastion of Marxism. Aren't there more degrees per capita on
college campuses? Aren't there also more liberals per capita on college
campuses?

Nobby, you don't know WTF you're talking about... again.

DSK



He can wish upon a star, can't he? :-)

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 22 May 2004 21:04:11 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"John H" wrote in message
.. .


You probably didn't *really* want to know, but since you asked, :-)

And they elevated terrorism to previously unheard of levels.

John H

I see. If evil deeds negate past contributions, then we're all in trouble.
Want a list of ours?


I negated nothing. I simply added to the list so graciously provided, which you
snipped.

Hell, I love Algebra! I'm not wild about the Hassassin, however.

John H

Do you love Algebra as much as you love seeing pictures of little
girls "in the Biblical sense"?

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

John H wrote in message . ..
On Sat, 22 May 2004 16:58:35 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Some snipped
Sorry, bozo, but the ill-educated dentist from the south conveniently
skipped over my little disclaimer regarding "the last 100 years."
Apparently you don't read so well, either. Not surprising.


Harry, you are becomming a whinny little bitch.




You want to come over here and try to do something about it, **** for
brains?

What would you have him do about it, Harry? Go back and read all your posts for
the last two months, and perhaps you'll understand his comment. Your posts are
becoming quite "whiny".

Maybe if you backed off the name-calling and flip-flopping you'd get some of the
respect you obviously think you deserve. Maybe someone besides b'asskisser would
consider holding a discussion with you.

BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms were untouched.

Please note that your *threat* above appears to be a cut and paste of something
b'asskisser has posted.

John H

Yes, I'd certainly threaten YOU John. Why? Because I have a dislike
for potential child molesters. Do you remember hoping to see pictures
of little girls "in the Biblical sense"?

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
And they elevated terrorism to previously unheard of levels.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!


No, far worse levels have been heard of in Europe and in America.

Look up what happened to the Huegonots in France. Over 10,000 slaughtered
in
one day. Nearest Arab was 1000 miles away.

Like I need another reason to hate the French...

Yes, your blind, ignorant hatred DOES span the globe.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message ...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...
"Don White" wrote in message
...

"Jim" wrote in message
...
For milk or Gas?

Our gas is .96 per litre.


Is that Bush's fault too?

Yes, it is. He's to blame for ****ing off the Arab nations, et al.

The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now. ****
'em.
What have they contributed to society except for oil...which we helped
them
discover?

Gould has already told you about significant contributions by Arabs. I
must add, though how ignorant you've proven yourself. They even
invented the numbering and math systems you use today. I was really
surprised by your above comment. I didn't know you were THAT dumb.
I'd like to add one, the Baghdad Battery. It's a simple voltic pile
battery, but, alas, it was made over 2000 years ago!!!

Relax, basshole. My statement already accomplished what it set out to
accomplish in the first place. And that would be...exposing Harry as the
lying hypocrite that he is. Here's what he said in April 2002:

"The reality is that for at least the last 100 years, the so-called Arab
states have contributed absolutely nothing to the furthering of society in
any field of endeavor and the only reason anyone tolerates their anti-social
behavior is because they happen to be sitting on oil. If it weren't for
their oil, no one would pay them the slightest attention.
Their contributions to the fields of medicine, other sciences, the arts,
socialization, you name it and there is nothing there. Oh...I
forgot...they're adept at cowardice, at furthering the methodology of
terrorism and waging war on non-combatants."

----------------------------------------------------
You guys are so predictable...but it's still fun playing with you.

Nah, you are the predictable one. Anything that BushCo does, we can
count on you blindly following....you are nothing short of another
worthless lemming.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
I'll try to dig it up. It was in either Florida Sportsman or Sal****er
Sportsman in the last 12 months...I think. I keep all of the old
issues,
and when I'm looking for info about fishing in June, I have 4 years
worth of
June issues to read through...so I may have picked up the article in a
back
issue.

It was pretty simple, though. Lay down a heavy layer of salt. Place a
single layer of shrimp on top, and then cover with another heavy layer
of
salt.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


John H wrote:



BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms were

untouched


Were they fresh shrimp? Or previously frozen? For unfrozen but dead
dhrimp, I found a one hour dunking in Diet Pepsi made them
irresistable
to whiting, a variety, sadly, not found in the Bay. At least I've not
found any.

I don't much like using frozen shrimp as bait. It disintegrates and
falls off the hook too fast.


I read where you can "salt-cure" the shrimp after they die and it

toughens

them up. You can then store them unrefrigerated. I haven't tried it,

but

the article I read says the salt-cured shrimp stay on the hook much

better

than the frozen stuff, stores easier, and works just as well for
tipping
jigs.




Ever tried a D.O.A. shrimp?


DOA shrimp in "glow" color catches just about anything in SW
Florida...except when the bait fish are plentiful in the late spring,
summer, and early fall , and the fish have a better selection of food
sources. I've tried the other colors without any luck. You can buy a
48-pack direct from DOA on their website. However, it's a variety pack

of

different colors. They'll do all one color, but you have to call them

on

the phone and request it.




Love to see that article on the salt cure for shrimp....






Thanks. I still subscribe to FS, which I consider the best fishing mag
in the known universe. I even have a vague memory of the article you are
mentioning.

I think that same article may have discussed keeping shrimp alive overnight
by layering wet newspaper on top of ice in a cooler and then laying down the
shrimp, and then covering them with additional wet newspaper.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"DSK" wrote in message
. ..
That explains why women with more years of education are more likely to
support pro-choice candidates.


NOYB wrote:
And men with more years of education are more likely to vote Republican.

??? And here I thought that all the geeky Ph.D ivery-tower types were
the last bastion of Marxism. Aren't there more degrees per capita on
college campuses? Aren't there also more liberals per capita on college
campuses?


The article I was referencing was one I had mentioned back in January. I
haven't been able to find the specific article, but it talked about how
women have a tendency to vote for a Democrat when they achieve higher levels
of education...and men's voting habits go in the exact opposite direction
(they tend to vote for Republicans). The story was from a more liberal news
outlet from what I can remember, and was trying to make the point that the
Democratic base should grow faster than the Republican base since: a) there
are more women than men, and b) women are attaining higher levels of
education than in the past.

It is true what you say about post-grads having a slightly higher tendency
to vote Democratic. That discrepancy is higher among women and lower among
men. However, people "with some college", and people "with a college
degree", vote overwhelmingly for Republicans. People with "less than a high
school degree" vote overwhelmingly for Democrats. People "with a high
school degree" are pretty evenly split.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And
when,
oh
dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab
people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As I
stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago, you
just
stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years,
the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the
furthering
of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any
subject
in
Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides of
any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years"
in
my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I
have
to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however.
He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in this
case.
But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right?

No.

If yes, explain why.

Since the answer is "no", *you* must explain why.

Here's my original post, with the 100-year caveat added:

"The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now. ****
'em. What have they contributed to society (in the last 100 years)
except
for oil...which we helped them discover?"

Time for you to hit the books, then. Do you know how to find your public
library? What you need will not be found on the web.

Negative contributions to society don't count. I obviously needed to add an
additional caveat for the anal retentives: "what positive contributions have
they made in the last 100 years?".

Nevertheless, the whole point of the post was to express my agreement with
Harry's statement from 2 years ago...and see if he changed his stance again.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And
when,
oh
dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab
people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As
I
stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago,
you
just
stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years,
the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the
furthering
of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any
subject
in
Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides
of
any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years"
in
my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I
have
to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however.
He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in
this
case.
But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you
would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right?

No.

If yes, explain why.

Since the answer is "no", *you* must explain why.

Here's my original post, with the 100-year caveat added:

"The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now.
****
'em. What have they contributed to society (in the last 100 years)
except
for oil...which we helped them discover?"

Time for you to hit the books, then. Do you know how to find your public
library? What you need will not be found on the web.

Negative contributions to society don't count. I obviously needed to add
an
additional caveat for the anal retentives: "what positive contributions
have
they made in the last 100 years?".

Nevertheless, the whole point of the post was to express my agreement with
Harry's statement from 2 years ago...and see if he changed his stance
again.



You're stuck on the subject of what Arabs have done to the rest of the world
during the past 100 years. Reverse that, and get your silly ass to the
library.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
I'll try to dig it up. It was in either Florida Sportsman or
Sal****er
Sportsman in the last 12 months...I think. I keep all of the old
issues,
and when I'm looking for info about fishing in June, I have 4 years
worth of
June issues to read through...so I may have picked up the article in a
back
issue.

It was pretty simple, though. Lay down a heavy layer of salt. Place
a
single layer of shrimp on top, and then cover with another heavy layer
of
salt.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


John H wrote:



BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms
were

untouched


Were they fresh shrimp? Or previously frozen? For unfrozen but dead
dhrimp, I found a one hour dunking in Diet Pepsi made them
irresistable
to whiting, a variety, sadly, not found in the Bay. At least I've
not
found any.

I don't much like using frozen shrimp as bait. It disintegrates and
falls off the hook too fast.


I read where you can "salt-cure" the shrimp after they die and it

toughens

them up. You can then store them unrefrigerated. I haven't tried
it,

but

the article I read says the salt-cured shrimp stay on the hook much

better

than the frozen stuff, stores easier, and works just as well for
tipping
jigs.




Ever tried a D.O.A. shrimp?


DOA shrimp in "glow" color catches just about anything in SW
Florida...except when the bait fish are plentiful in the late spring,
summer, and early fall , and the fish have a better selection of food
sources. I've tried the other colors without any luck. You can buy a
48-pack direct from DOA on their website. However, it's a variety
pack

of

different colors. They'll do all one color, but you have to call
them

on

the phone and request it.




Love to see that article on the salt cure for shrimp....






Thanks. I still subscribe to FS, which I consider the best fishing mag
in the known universe. I even have a vague memory of the article you are
mentioning.

I think that same article may have discussed keeping shrimp alive
overnight
by layering wet newspaper on top of ice in a cooler and then laying down
the
shrimp, and then covering them with additional wet newspaper.



Works for crayfish.