( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"John H" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:58:06 GMT, "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:JUQrc.97601$iF6.8839333@attbi_s02...
LOL, now Harry is sounding like Basskisser. From what I have heard
Harry
is
an fat old man who can be blow over by a heavy wind. His insecurities
are
so obvious, what with the Lobster Boat and the Doctor Doctor wife being
exposed as a figment of his imagination, the only thing he has left is
to
threaten someone. He is nothing more than a whinny little bitch.

"whinny"???


Yeah, like the whiny sounds of a young horse.

Hmmm....7:27 PM....cocktails taking effect?

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And when, oh
dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab
people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As I
stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago, you just
stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years, the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the
furthering
of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any subject
in
Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides of any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years" in my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I have to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however. He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in this case.
But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right? If yes, explain why.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"bb" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 22 May 2004 22:44:33 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

Not at all. You're the one that seems to have a problem, in your own
semi-literate way.

Semi-literate? You're being generous again, Harry.

bb

bb, get back under the rock!

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

I'll try to dig it up. It was in either Florida Sportsman or Sal****er
Sportsman in the last 12 months...I think. I keep all of the old issues,
and when I'm looking for info about fishing in June, I have 4 years worth of
June issues to read through...so I may have picked up the article in a back
issue.

It was pretty simple, though. Lay down a heavy layer of salt. Place a
single layer of shrimp on top, and then cover with another heavy layer of
salt.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John H wrote:


BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms were

untouched


Were they fresh shrimp? Or previously frozen? For unfrozen but dead
dhrimp, I found a one hour dunking in Diet Pepsi made them irresistable
to whiting, a variety, sadly, not found in the Bay. At least I've not
found any.

I don't much like using frozen shrimp as bait. It disintegrates and
falls off the hook too fast.


I read where you can "salt-cure" the shrimp after they die and it
toughens
them up. You can then store them unrefrigerated. I haven't tried it,
but
the article I read says the salt-cured shrimp stay on the hook much
better
than the frozen stuff, stores easier, and works just as well for tipping
jigs.



Ever tried a D.O.A. shrimp?


DOA shrimp in "glow" color catches just about anything in SW
Florida...except when the bait fish are plentiful in the late spring,
summer, and early fall , and the fish have a better selection of food
sources. I've tried the other colors without any luck. You can buy a
48-pack direct from DOA on their website. However, it's a variety pack
of
different colors. They'll do all one color, but you have to call them
on
the phone and request it.




Love to see that article on the salt cure for shrimp....

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

The Dec. 2001 Sal****er Sportsman has an article on "brining" trolling baits
like ballyhoo in order to "toughen them up". I haven't found the shrimp
article yet.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

John H wrote:


BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms were

untouched


Were they fresh shrimp? Or previously frozen? For unfrozen but dead
dhrimp, I found a one hour dunking in Diet Pepsi made them irresistable
to whiting, a variety, sadly, not found in the Bay. At least I've not
found any.

I don't much like using frozen shrimp as bait. It disintegrates and
falls off the hook too fast.


I read where you can "salt-cure" the shrimp after they die and it
toughens
them up. You can then store them unrefrigerated. I haven't tried it,
but
the article I read says the salt-cured shrimp stay on the hook much
better
than the frozen stuff, stores easier, and works just as well for tipping
jigs.



Ever tried a D.O.A. shrimp?


DOA shrimp in "glow" color catches just about anything in SW
Florida...except when the bait fish are plentiful in the late spring,
summer, and early fall , and the fish have a better selection of food
sources. I've tried the other colors without any luck. You can buy a
48-pack direct from DOA on their website. However, it's a variety pack
of
different colors. They'll do all one color, but you have to call them
on
the phone and request it.




Love to see that article on the salt cure for shrimp....

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And when,
oh
dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab
people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As I
stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago, you
just
stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years, the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the
furthering
of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any
subject
in
Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides of any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years" in my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I have to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however. He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in this
case.
But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right?

No.

If yes, explain why.

Since the answer is "no", *you* must explain why.

Here's my original post, with the 100-year caveat added:

"The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now. ****
'em. What have they contributed to society (in the last 100 years) except
for oil...which we helped them discover?"

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And
when,
oh
dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab
people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As I
stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago, you
just
stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years, the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the
furthering
of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any
subject
in
Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides of
any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years" in
my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I have
to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however. He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in this
case.
But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right?

No.

If yes, explain why.

Since the answer is "no", *you* must explain why.

Here's my original post, with the 100-year caveat added:

"The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now. ****
'em. What have they contributed to society (in the last 100 years) except
for oil...which we helped them discover?"

Time for you to hit the books, then. Do you know how to find your public
library? What you need will not be found on the web.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

NOYB wrote:
I'll try to dig it up. It was in either Florida Sportsman or Sal****er
Sportsman in the last 12 months...I think. I keep all of the old issues,
and when I'm looking for info about fishing in June, I have 4 years worth of
June issues to read through...so I may have picked up the article in a back
issue.

It was pretty simple, though. Lay down a heavy layer of salt. Place a
single layer of shrimp on top, and then cover with another heavy layer of
salt.



"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

NOYB wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...


John H wrote:



BTW, we were using both blood worms and shrimp. The blood worms were

untouched


Were they fresh shrimp? Or previously frozen? For unfrozen but dead
dhrimp, I found a one hour dunking in Diet Pepsi made them irresistable
to whiting, a variety, sadly, not found in the Bay. At least I've not
found any.

I don't much like using frozen shrimp as bait. It disintegrates and
falls off the hook too fast.


I read where you can "salt-cure" the shrimp after they die and it

toughens

them up. You can then store them unrefrigerated. I haven't tried it,

but

the article I read says the salt-cured shrimp stay on the hook much

better

than the frozen stuff, stores easier, and works just as well for tipping
jigs.




Ever tried a D.O.A. shrimp?


DOA shrimp in "glow" color catches just about anything in SW
Florida...except when the bait fish are plentiful in the late spring,
summer, and early fall , and the fish have a better selection of food
sources. I've tried the other colors without any luck. You can buy a
48-pack direct from DOA on their website. However, it's a variety pack

of

different colors. They'll do all one color, but you have to call them

on

the phone and request it.




Love to see that article on the salt cure for shrimp....






Thanks. I still subscribe to FS, which I consider the best fishing mag
in the known universe. I even have a vague memory of the article you are
mentioning.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

NOYB wrote:

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:H%Brc.2811$af3.146408@attbi_s51...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message And when,

oh

dumb one, wase the list of accomplishments of the Arab

people "accomplished," as it were. More than 100 years ago. As I

stated.


You did not state any of the accomplishments over 100 yrs ago, you

just

stated : "The reality is that for at least the last 100 years, the
so-called Arab states have contributed absolutely nothing to the

furthering

of society"

It is so easy to see Harry flip flop on issues, just type in any

subject

in

Google and you can see Harry arguing the extreme on both sides of any
debate.

As badly as I wanted to include the caveat "in the last 100 years" in my
criticism of Arabs, I was afraid I'd tip him off to my troll. I have to
say...I couldn't have asked for a better reply to my post however. He
sometimes diverts course a bit, and I expected a mild rebuke in this

case.

But "who woulda thunk it" that he'd do a complete 180!?!?



If you *had* included that time limitation in your troll, you would've
snared YOURSELF. You understand why, right?


No.


If yes, explain why.


Since the answer is "no", *you* must explain why.

Here's my original post, with the 100-year caveat added:

"The Arab nations hated us before Bush, and hate us even more now. ****
'em. What have they contributed to society (in the last 100 years) except
for oil...which we helped them discover?"






Some interesting characters, mainly, and even a few worthy ones.

( OT ) Where have you gone, Rosy Scenario?
 

That explains why women with more years of education are more likely to
support pro-choice candidates.


NOYB wrote:
And men with more years of education are more likely to vote Republican.

??? And here I thought that all the geeky Ph.D ivery-tower types were
the last bastion of Marxism. Aren't there more degrees per capita on
college campuses? Aren't there also more liberals per capita on college
campuses?

Nobby, you don't know WTF you're talking about... again.

DSK