Harry,
I noticed that you did not disagree that with my statement that the articles
and reviews Chuck writes are fluff pieces so the magazine can sell the
builder ad space.


"HarryKrause" wrote in message
...
Yo Ho wrote:
Chuck,
Everyone who has ever made a post concerning your fluff PR articles have
stated they understand they are PR fluff to sell ads. Even Harry and
bass understands that, why are you still denying the obvious.

You don't speak for me, Smithers.

I read Chuck's pieces because he's a good writer and typically gets aboard
larger boats I'll never see but have a voyeur's interest in, as it were. I
learn a bit from Chuck's articles. If I wanted to buy one of the boats
he's discussed, I'd spend a considerable amount of time researching it,
and I'd arrange a factory visit. I did that with all the boats I've owned
in the last two decades.

One boat Chuck wrote about really interested me, the Camano 31, a
mini-trawler that can get up and move. His was the second article on the
boat I read, and his findings were similar to those of the other article.

I find it fascinating that you and several others here "knock" Chuck and
his articles, when there is no evidence that any of you are gainfully
employed in anything that does any good for anyone. Chuck's work makes me
smile. I have a feeling whatyou and Hertvik and several others do here
would make me puke.

Of course, what you fellows do for a living remains a state secret, right?

This morning, I noted that I recognized you with your 50th handle
immediately, because:

An asshole by any name still smells like ****.

That would be you, Smithers.







--
If it is Bad for Bush,
It is Good for the United States.