wrote:

http://www.mopedarmy.com/resources/mod/boatnut/

If I were JimH, I'd track down this guy with a really similar name and
living in about the same area. Apparently he's fallen on hard times, is
resigning his commission in the Moped Army, and has been forced to put
his war horse up for sale. It might make sense to buy that thing, and
get the other JimH off the streets of (insert name of town here), just
to save whatever might be left of the family reputation.

"Swarm and Destroy", indeed.


He he! Always blaming it on Jeff... do you think JimH actually drives
that toy around the neighbourhood? No wonder they banned him from
boating...they probably took his moped license too.

"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals


I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but
one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it
a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me? Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.

P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals



Hey, Fritz. You're probably still in orbital ecstasy afer the
appearance of GWB on TV last night attempting to resell the war in
Iraq. That being the case, you can be excused for overlooking the fact
that I told bass I thought the photo itself was funny, but that it
didn't need to be used to flame another person in the NG. Same
standard. Typical practice for "liberals". :-)

Is that the same standard that made you think publishing his home
information was a joke?


wrote in message
ups.com...


P. Fritz wrote:
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

It is hypocrisy......standard practice for liebrals



Hey, Fritz. You're probably still in orbital ecstasy afer the
appearance of GWB on TV last night attempting to resell the war in
Iraq. That being the case, you can be excused for overlooking the fact
that I told bass I thought the photo itself was funny, but that it
didn't need to be used to flame another person in the NG. Same
standard. Typical practice for "liberals". :-)

Jim, you have been doing nothing but attacking Chuck, now when he shoots
back you whine about it. Personally I think you two should meet and have a
beer and have a hell of a good time. Life is to short for this bs. But of
course this is just MY opinion . Btw Anyone wanna go fishing ?

Ed
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but
one not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me? Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.

I did not post his home address. I did not stalk him to obtain that
information. I confronted him on several reviews and opinions he offered
here. If he chooses to offer boat reviews then he is subject to questions
and criticisms.

His retaliatory behavior, however, is certainly not acceptable and speaks
loudly of his personal ethics and morals.

He has now sunk to the same level as Harry Krause. Both are internet
stalkers. Both find it acceptable to post the name and address of NG
members they have a disagreement with.

Pathetic.


"ed" wrote in message
...
Jim, you have been doing nothing but attacking Chuck, now when he shoots
back you whine about it. Personally I think you two should meet and have a
beer and have a hell of a good time. Life is to short for this bs. But of
course this is just MY opinion . Btw Anyone wanna go fishing ?

Ed
"*JimH*" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but
one not having any sexual connotations like this one does.

This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it
a "hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me?
Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.

*JimH* wrote:
I did not post his home address. I did not stalk him to obtain that
information. I confronted him on several reviews and opinions he offered
here. If he chooses to offer boat reviews then he is subject to questions
and criticisms.

His retaliatory behavior, however, is certainly not acceptable and speaks
loudly of his personal ethics and morals.



And I did not post your home address, JimH.
I know where to find it, should I ever want it, but who would? Not like
I'm coming to visit anytime soon.

Your confrontations on my reviews and opinions are all
personality-based, not technical. You freely admitted you were not
familiar with the small Sea Ray I described, yet you characterized my
comments as so inaccurate that they were immoral. You're an ex-boater
who hovers around here hoping to take pot-shots at
people on your "list". If you want to challenge or confront people on
boating issues, stick to the issues and leave the personal remarks off
the table.

My "retaliatory" (very accurate choice of word, by the way) "behavior"
isn't intended to be something you would consider "acceptable". Duh----
that's why it really is "retaliatory".

You dish it out 24/7/365. Glad I could upset you just a bit by
returning the favor for a change. :-)

ed wrote:
Jim, you have been doing nothing but attacking Chuck, now when he shoots
back you whine about it. Personally I think you two should meet and have a
beer and have a hell of a good time. Life is to short for this bs. But of
course this is just MY opinion . Btw Anyone wanna go fishing ?

Ed


Some people actually enjoy attacking and fighting with others. The Rev
JimH seems to be that way under his righteous cloak.

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.


JimH wrote:

For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with
his
own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that
exclusively
dealt with mopeds.

Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by.

*****************

Make note: Dishes out all day everyday but hates to take it.
Make second note: Fails to recognize his son as a "guy with a really
similar name and living in about the same location".
Make third note: Apparently considers his typical behavior in the NG a
demonstration of a "higher moral standard"
Make fourth note: Follows his adversaries around the internet to make
snide personal remarks wherever he can, but considers viewing a
publicly available website where he has posted a Moped for sale
"stalking".

Conclusion: Just good old fashioned mean, and not so very bright.

Recommendation to "get a life": Whiz around on Moped, swarm and
destroy.

This really is turning into a funny thread. :-)







This picture and the post was a direct personal attack. But you find it a
"hoot" this time.....perhaps because it is directed towards me? Indeed.

Double standards.

I understand now.

wrote in message
oups.com...


*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


wrote:
http://www.allfunpix.com/fun_signs/p...h_service.html

That's a hoot!

(But it woulda been just as funny, no, even funnier, if it wasn't
lobbed at a specific individual)


Double standards Chuck? Me thinks so.

I remember you jumping on me for posting a similar juvenile picture, but
one
not having any sexual connotations like this one does.


JimH wrote:

For your information that moped belonged to my son. He bought it with
his
own money. I was selling it for him and that was one site that
exclusively
dealt with mopeds.

Get a life Chuck. Then find some higher moral standards to live by.

*****************

Make note: Dishes out all day everyday but hates to take it.

Bull****. I have never posted personal information about you.

You sunk to a new low just because I took you to task about a fluff boating
review you did. You got your shorts in a knot about it and decided to
retaliate by publishing personal information about me here in this NG.

You have not ethics or morals Chuck.