"John H" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:02:04 -0400, "Don"
wrote:

"Bert Robbins" wrote
"Don" wrote
"Bert Robbins" wrote
Like NYOB said, better to be killing our enemies on foriegn soil
rather
than
ours.

Why is that better?

Less mess in the U.S. to clean up and fewer U.S. citizens killed.

US citizens are already being killed in Iraq, and the US taxpayers are
going
to pay to clean up the mess over there, right?
Wouldn't it be less expensive and easier to clean the mess over here?
Not to mention, people like you could have the opportunity to jump in
there
and do your part.


The last mess cost about five and a half times the number of lives lost in
Iraq,
and probably that many times the dollars we've spent in Iraq.

In the first 6 years of VN less than 500 US lives were lost.
Iraq has surpassed that number in the first year.
In other words, you don't know what you're talking about.
The truth is John, that it is easier for cowards like you to send young folk
to foreign lands to do your fighting for you.
If the **** was coming down here in the US there is the slightest chance
that you might get a bullet in the back of your stupid head.
You were a coward 40 years ago and you remain so today.
Carry your fat ass back to your easychair, grab another brew and the remote
and shut the **** up.