BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   When would you board someone else's boat?? (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/4125-when-would-you-board-someone-elses-boat.html)

Charles April 22nd 04 09:04 PM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would youboard someone else's boat??
 


Doug Kanter wrote:

If that is correct, when does that neighbor reap what he has sown?


When Doug Kanter metes out his justice?

-- Charlie

Doug Kanter April 22nd 04 09:07 PM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

If that is correct, when does that neighbor reap what he has sown?


When Doug Kanter metes out his justice?

-- Charlie


Actually, I think you'll be surprised at Henry's answer to that question.
Stay tuned.



Doug Kanter April 22nd 04 09:09 PM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

I see where your anger comes from. You were a patsy for 9-1/2 years and

you
feel bitter about it. I'm not suggesting that you should've killed your
neighbor. But, there are ways to begin and end a legal process so fast

that
the neighbor doesn't have time to even think about it. If you didn't

have
the balls for that, it's YOUR problem.



Nice try kanter, but your doggie doesn't hunt. Not everyone is so
tightly strung as yourself that they are compelled to avenge the
misdeeds of others against themselves.

-- Charlie


If you were faced with the hypothetical muffler situation I described, and
you could predict no end to it, you would put a stop to it in any way you
could before you'd let the neighbor drive you mad from sleep deprivation.
However, for the purpose of this discussion, it's convenient for you to
claim otherwise.



Don White April 22nd 04 09:25 PM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

Henry Blackmoore wrote in message news:svUhc.5070
I also own an Australian Cattle dog. And when any of them do wrong, I

don't
even have to raise my voice. I just admonish them in a certain tone and

they
tow the line. They will do anything to have me praise them. I can't

even
get upset around them about anything as they will do their best to love me
into relaxing and staying calm. They are the ultimate chill pills.


I have a visual image of those dogs marching around your back 40..saluting
you as you come & go.



John H April 22nd 04 10:00 PM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 20:09:14 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

I see where your anger comes from. You were a patsy for 9-1/2 years and

you
feel bitter about it. I'm not suggesting that you should've killed your
neighbor. But, there are ways to begin and end a legal process so fast

that
the neighbor doesn't have time to even think about it. If you didn't

have
the balls for that, it's YOUR problem.



Nice try kanter, but your doggie doesn't hunt. Not everyone is so
tightly strung as yourself that they are compelled to avenge the
misdeeds of others against themselves.

-- Charlie


If you were faced with the hypothetical muffler situation I described, and
you could predict no end to it, you would put a stop to it in any way you
could before you'd let the neighbor drive you mad from sleep deprivation.
However, for the purpose of this discussion, it's convenient for you to
claim otherwise.


Doug, there's an old saying about catching more flies with honey, or something
like that. So, this scenario seems like a good opportunity for some honey, or
maybe a pound of sugar.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

Harry Krause April 22nd 04 10:37 PM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Don White wrote:
Henry Blackmoore wrote in message news:svUhc.5070

I also own an Australian Cattle dog.



Is her name Karen Smith?

Bob D. April 23rd 04 12:18 AM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 
In article . net,
(Henry Blackmoore) wrote:

In article ,

(Bob D.) wrote:

I don't agree with Doug's specific comments about ignoring distress calls,
or watching a boat burn, but then again, I'm not taking what he says
literally as much reading in stating two underlying points:


Why not take them literally? He means them literally and he even says so.


I did not take Doug literally because I chose not to take Doug
literally. IMHO there is OFTEN a difference in what someone says what
they intend to do out of the emotion of a heated discussion, and what
they do when faced wth the reality of the situation. If Doug said he
watched a boat sink, or refused to aid in a distress call based upon a
previous experience with the boat's owner, then yes, I would have no
choice but to take his statements literally. He didn't. Even if he did,
that was HIS choice, and even if I don't agree with that choice I have to
consider that he did not go out of his way to cause harm, and I do not
know all the details of his decision; therefore, I cannot conclude he is a
person completely without redeeming qualities as you seem to be
suggesting.

I really think you need to lighten up, Henry. Look at the general
viewpoint not just keywords. Neither Doug or myself have aimed any
personal attack against you. Yet you seem to be pretty nasty, on a
personal level, in voicing your dissent. If everyone took every single
post word for word and not the INTENT of the author then the bickering
would never end. Though it's beginning to look like some of us just like
to "play mean" in our little sandbox for the sake of "playing mean"
doesn't it?


1. It takes so little effort and time to show consideration for other
people.
2. You can't go through life not giving a **** about the people

around you,
while carrying expectations that everyone should give a ****

about you.

When people forget or ignore these simple truisms, which IMHO are needed
for society to function, all bets are off. Forget them and antagonize
someone who is having a bad day, and bad things can happen. When bad
things do happen to the social offender, while the punishment might not
fit the crime, I have a hard time considering them to be the victim, so in
an effort to avoid these "bad things" I would suggest:

3. Never assume somone's inconsideration towards you is a deliberate act.

I personally will act with goodwill and assume the person committing their
offense to me is goodhearted but oblivious as to their actions. As such,
I will ignore it if it is the first time the offense occurred with that
party, if the action could be deemed as non-deliberate, AND the action
doesn't persist for a great deal of time. If those criteria are not met,
I will tactfully talk with them in hopes of reaching a solution.
Sometimes the solution consists only of hearing a reasonable explanation
as to why the offending behavior is occuring.

Should these steps fail, I'm moving further into Doug's camp.


Doug is a mentally unstable vigilante type. You are of that persuasion too?


Doug may be a "mentally unstable vigilante type" I don't presume to know
either way. Once again I don't agree with Doug "word for word" but I do
share Doug's opinions of "personal responsibility" and "reaping what you
sow". Add to this the fact that I always give people the benefit of the
doubt, believing that their hurtful actions were unintentional, until I
have proof otherwise. I'd say in a nutshell portrays me a tolerant and
reasonable person, who seeks to resolve differences through
communication. If those difference cannot be discussed reasonably then I
will stick up for what I believe in and take a harder line, preferably
within the law, but if the behavior is bad enough (e.g raping my mother,
girlfriend, daughter), I'd have to admit I'm not evolved enough to claim I
would never stray outside the law.

As for calling "mental stability" to question, you've never interacted
with me, met me in person, you've probably read only a handful of my post,
and what you've read you blatantly out of context in a very self-serving
manner. And while most people can tell I need to take a typing class or
use a spell-checker, you seem to suggest that you can actually infer my
mental health from my agreements on points of somone you take issue with?
With undergrad majors in psychology and sociology, take what I say
serioulsly when I say you have rare gift indeed....


Oh I won't
ignore that distress call or refuse to help save their boat, but when I
help them, I'll be reminding them who I was and how they offended me,


So somebody is drowning and their boat sinking and you will be bringing
up petty ass bull**** and rubbing it in while you are helping to rescue

them?
Maybe you are in Doug's "camp" after all?


Hmmmm.... who said "petty ass bull****?", Henry. Who said "sinking",
Henry? Who says that I will lecture them the moment I rescue them from
drowning? YOU DID, NOT ME! Please, don't make up a situation in such
absolute terms than use it to put words in my mouth, it does a disservice
to both of us.

To clarify, I'm not taking about someone who just accidently ****ed me off
one time. I'm talking about flamming assholes who have repeatedly blast
their stereo at 3 am after they staggered back to their boat from the
bars, or parties who repeatedly decided they should rev their unmuffled
engines at 4am so they can impress the girls they picked up. I'm talking
about people who ELECT to do these things, despite posted rules, and
repeated requests to stop. At 3am or 4am deeming this as blatantly rude
behavior is not a "subjective" standard as you allude to, therefore the
request to stop is a VERY reasonable one (not a ****y one), so what is
wrong with being outraged when then request is repeatedly ignored?

While the circumstance hasn't happened, so I can't state with 100%
certainty, should the assholes in those vessels need my assistance, I'm
guessing that I would take a certain satisfaction at their situation. In
an effort to be open and reasonable with you, I'll even concede your point
that the satisfaction I take is a character flaw of me personaly and not a
indicative of human nature in general. In fact, I will freely admit I am
far from perfect. I'm sure a select few people can provoke "my bad side"
to the point of retaliation, but that would take a very deliberate act to
invoke the response on their part, with my consequences coming with ample
warning.

Since you felt the need to fault my weakness in taking this satisfaction,
if you can honestly say that you would not derive ANY satisfaction from
seeing someone who intentionally made you miserable get kicked by karma,
if you can honestly say that you can NEVER be provoked to retaliation,
then at least within the confines of this discussion, you are a bigger and
better person than I am. Unfortunately, any statement you would make,
putting you in a better light would, IMHO, be overshadowed by the cheap
shots, name calling, judgemental, and narrow-minded absolute statements
coming from posts with YOUR name on them.

How I'd love for you to prove me wrong, about your being a bigger person,
Henry. Actions speak louder than words, and I have always been moved to
learn from the good example of others. If I had my way, I'd send the
aforementioned assholes to your marina. After you've worked your ass off
all week for a relaxing weekend, you can demonstrate to me your more
evolved sensibility as they excercise their god given right to disturb
their neighbors at all hours without any comment or retaliation. It
would be worth losing a few nights sleep to witness someone with such an
evolved sensibility, and be proven wrong.


smiling, knowing there's a little divine justice in my small corner of the
world. In addition, should they continue their actions, I'll do whatever
is necessary to lessen their action's impact upon me, stop their actions,
or teach them consideration, regardless of the consequences, as I have
absolutely no desire to live in a world where inconsideration for others
becomes an acceptable behavior.


So you in effect are using "inconsideration for others" to fight
inconsideration for others and damn any laws? Your perceived
standards of acceptable behavior becomes the basis for your anti-social
and unacceptable (acceptable to you) behavior towards others. That is
pretty deep. Have you sought help for this yet?



Once again Henry, except for the circumstances Doug outlined, where did I
specifically say I would be inconsiderate? Did I EVER say that this is
EVER my first course of action. No,, Henry. In fact, in my previous
post, I carefully spelled out that I have ALWAYS made attempts to reason
with someone who was being inconsiderate, and work within the law. Yet
you repeatedly ignore this fact and take exception to the fact that I will
take a stand when all else fails, using your keen insight to declare me a
vigilante and suggest I need to seek help? Excuse me, but I have to ask,
what are your credentials? Assuming your a therapist, what methods to
you use to get your patients to acquiesce to the systematic victimization
that we should all be excercising?

Perhaps you have never had stand up for your beliefs and take matters into
your own hands, which is not necessarily a bad thing. Once again, I may
have to concede you are a bigger person than myself. However, judging by
your juvenille postings, I'm guessing it more likely you either lacked the
fortitude, or were blessed with the luck of not being in a situation bad
enough, to be provoked out of your "evolved" state of mind, rather than
attributing your tolerance to any strength of character.


In the case Doug presented, should I go through all the actions he
described: Tolerance, communication, inaction from the authorities, then
being told to screw myself. It will come down to three choices for the
inconsidrate *******. Fix your exhaust. Compromise with me and learn to
leave quickly and get use to being a little less comfortable on your drive
to work in the winter, or be alot less comfortable changing tires in that
same winter climate.


Are you a Dougie sock puppet?


Ha Ha Ha... yippeee! More name calling! Have you sufficiently entertained
yourself, Henry?


For those who think "rubbing their nose in their own mess" is wrong for
dogs or people, I've trained several dogs, and many people (when I had
to) that way, and they seemed to learn the intended lesson just fine.


Dogs have very short attention spans. You have to catch them in the act to
correct any errant behavior. The only thing that they will learn by rubbing
their noses in their own **** is that want him to eat feces. The dog will
also learn to be afraid of you and also to be afraid of eliminating in
your presence. Only an ignorant lout would train a dog the way you have
described. Do you advocate hitting your dogs too?

With your abhorrent dog-training skills I shudder to think about your ability
to handle & deal with people.



Well I guess dogs aren't the only ones with short attention spans eh
Henry? Okey Dokey, Henry. Since you insist on listing pointless nits and
derailing the subject (an excellent indication of a weak argument, IMHO),
I'll indulge you just this once!

My abhorrent dog training skills have worked for me. The several dogs
I've had were affectionate, playful, happy, and, despite what your
"extensive knowledge on canine behavior" says, NEVER CONSTIPATED. The
dogs I have had have lived very long and pampered lives and were adored by
me as loving faithful companions, but in the interest of a greater good,
they have had boundries and consequences for violating those boundries.
Yes I'll smack a dog, Henry, if that's what's needed to make the dog stop
an objectionable behavior. Henry, I'll even use corporeal l punishment on
my kids as well. My God, what an unenlightened lout I am! Please note:
There is a difference in correcting and abusing. I normally wouldn't cite
this, but based upon your responses, your of olympic caliber in the
conclusion jump....

I love animals and children, adults, and the world in general. As such
tough choices have to be made to make a better environment for everyone.
Often that choice involves dicipline. If my dog ****es, ****s, or chews
funiture in a house, they will not be welcome in the homes of my friends
and family and therefore their quality of life ultimately suffers for
them. If my dog jumps out of the boat and runs away, humps or bites the
children in the marina, or if I am not diligent in cleaning up after them,
then the dog will have to be locked in my boat's cabin when I leave. My
reasonable, and consistent discipline results in a well behaved dog I can
take with me more often and have subject to less restraint in familair
places (at the consent of others, of course). As such, the two dogs I had
as an adult lived to be 13 and 14, spending less than three weeks of that
time in a kennel. My current dogs behavior indicates that she will never
know a kennel she is that loved in the places we visit. So if I have to
occasionally rub a dogs nose in **** or slap their nose or behind for this
greater good, then I'll happily plead guilty to your accusations of being
a lout as charged.

As for my daughter, it's the same thing. I personally feel too many
people want to take the "hands off" approach or be "more creative" in
their parenting. My experience has been this lack of consistent and
absolute consequences often results in spoiled kids that will face a far
harsher discipline from the world when they go through life never having
learned consideration for others, reasoning, or working and compromising
to get what they want. I should know, my mom was to busy to instill what
I needed to learn, and I had a harder time as an adult than I would ever
care to have any kid go through, let alone my own. I'm fortunate that
I've only have to spank the point across to my daughter a few times, but
in my effort to raise a woman who is able to cope and thrive in the real
world, I'll do whatever it takes, regardless of how some arrogant outsider
with limited information on the situation perceives my actions.

When it comes to people, I'm the same way. I'm very good with people from
all social classes and all walks of life. Although I am a little
reserved, at the slightest goodwill, I will extend my warmest
hospitality. It's one of the reasons I love boating so much, it an
enviroment that encourages social behavior. Being imperfect, I have many
faults. I tend to be less friendly with abusive people, those who see
the everything in absolute "this is right" "this is wrong" terms, with no
shades of gray, those who are arrogant or self boastful, those who
"posture" in a social situations, those who don't take the time to
consider other peoples feelings, or people who take liberties at the
expense of others, and those who would rather argue a point at all cost
rather than be open to reason.

I've learned that I can be wrong about my assessment of someone character
and to keep my mouth shut. I'm always re-learning I need to distance
myself from people I don't like. If I can't distance myself and their
behavior is that objectionable, I've leaarned to approach them with
respect and tact, and work to resolve the issue. If they are reasonable,
I often make a new friend and both parties are richer for the experience.
Since I believe coutesy is for everyone, not just the other guy, I think
tactfully saying whats on your mind and pointing out inconsiderate
behavior benefits us all. If we all took time to consider how our
actions impacted others the world would be a better place. Of course
feel free to disagree with me here.

For
those who spout asserting my beliefs will eventually lead me to be
victimized by a CCW, it is noted. But then again, I may have a CCW too
and *I might* just be a quicker and better shot than the inconsiderate
******* I'm trying to reason with, so I hope any inconsiderate *******s
take note as well :^)


CCW or not. If you insist on acting out on your vigilante fantasies one
day the pigeons will come home to roost. One reaps what they sow
in life.


Bob D.




Very interesting. Just in this post alone, I've read how you took my
remarks completely out of context, without any provocation retorted to
name calling, called my character into question, hurled nasty remarks
about my mental stability, called to question my ability to deal with the
animals and people in my life that you've never met, then insist (despite
my posts to the contrast) upon continuing to take my words of my post out
of context use those select words to arrive at the conclusion that I am
hell bent on acting out "vigilante fantasies"? Then you have the nerve to
preach to me: "hoping I reap what I sow"?

You sir, are entertaining!

Yes Henry, I am a bit of an idealist. I do believe in personal
responsibility , and reaping what one sows. I have gotten knocked on my
ass for doing the wrong thing, and walked away smarter. I HAVE gotten
knocked on my ass for standing on my principles, but I'll do it again
because I truly believe that SOMEHOW people have to know when their making
others miserable and learn consideration. I wholeheartedly believe that
excercising and instilling politeness and courtesy not just for the "other
guy". Leaving others to deal when the inconsiderate assholes when heads
down the road, is avoiding responsibility. If one chooses to ignore truly
inconsiderate behavior one, is just as responsible for it occurrence.
Obviosly (to most people) like anything else I've stated this is flexible
with the circumstances.

As I have in the past, I'll stand up any day and reap what I sow. Henry,
will you stand up next to me and reap the efforts of your bickering,
finger pointing, name calling, and general hatred that you've sowed
today? Your post speaks volumes about your online personality. I only
hope that it is just that, an anonymous online personality of someone who
needs to provocatively lash out at online blow off some real world
steam. If this is the case, have fun continuing your nasty little
remarks. I'll rest easy thinking hurtful little troll on rec.boats is
probably a nicer person in the real world.

Sincerely,

Bob Dimond

Charles April 23rd 04 12:51 AM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When wouldyou board someone else's boat??
 


Doug Kanter wrote:

If you were faced with the hypothetical muffler situation I described, and
you could predict no end to it, you would put a stop to it in any way you
could before you'd let the neighbor drive you mad from sleep deprivation.


Not everyone approaches problems the way you describe yourself doing.
It's easy to say there is no way to solve a situation so that then you
can take justice into your own hands.


However, for the purpose of this discussion, it's convenient for you to
claim otherwise.


I made no claim of any sort.

I have a neighbor whose dog often comes into my yard to poop. I've
spoken to this neighbor several times about it and he's always
apologetic but with mixed results. Another neighbor who observed this
suggested I smear dog poop under the door handles of his car, or fling
it at his house.

Instead, when his dog poops in my yard I call him up and ask him to come
over and clean it up, which he cheerfully does.

Do I like his dog coming over here? No, but this solution is acceptable.
I'm happy, the neighbor is happy, and his dog is happy (I presume). I'm
not sitting here with smoke coming out of my ears dreaming up revenge so
I can feel smug about seeing some jerk get what's coming to them.

-- Charlie

Bob D. April 23rd 04 01:09 AM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 


I have a neighbor whose dog often comes into my yard to poop. I've
spoken to this neighbor several times about it and he's always
apologetic but with mixed results. Another neighbor who observed this
suggested I smear dog poop under the door handles of his car, or fling
it at his house.

Instead, when his dog poops in my yard I call him up and ask him to come
over and clean it up, which he cheerfully does.

Do I like his dog coming over here? No, but this solution is acceptable.
I'm happy, the neighbor is happy, and his dog is happy (I presume). I'm
not sitting here with smoke coming out of my ears dreaming up revenge so
I can feel smug about seeing some jerk get what's coming to them.

-- Charlie


What you did is called communication and reasoning. Thankfully this tact
usaully works and I'm glad it worked out to your satisfaction. I also
think in all cases this should be tried, even before "calling the cops".

Still, I have come accross people who can't be reasoned with. Period.
Taking the case of your neighbor, suppose the neighbor's response was:

"My dog wasn't over there, must have been someone elses..."

So you take picture of the dog crapping in your yard and show it to him.

"I really can't tell if that's my dog..."

So then you pound on their door the moment the dog crouches in your yard.
You finally have indisputable evidence the dog is crapping in your yard,
forcing the owner to own up to his responsibility, so he over and cleans
up the mess.

Are you always going to catch the dog crapping? Are you always going to
be able get the owner while the dog is crapping? Do you think based on
the owners previous responses that they will clean up the **** on their
own without your "indisputtable proof"?

In short, this person's lack of responsibility has put the burden on
someone else. Either be more vigilant alerting the owner, clean the ****
up yourself, or deal with the consequences of dog **** in your yard.
Since you can't be vigilant enough to always see where the dog went, you,
your family, or your guest may have to deal with stepping in dog **** and
bringing it into your house.

Please believe me, I'm not abdicating ANY course of action. I merely wish
to state that Doug is right in the sense that there are inconsiderate
people who can't be reaasoned with, and often if it not a criminal offense
the police (especially in larger cities) will not respond in a timely
manner. When they do the inconsiderate SOB merely denies their fault.
This ofen leads to finding a way to tolerate it or finding a way to make
them stop.

I know I'm being picky (unfortunately that's who I am), but to me it's not
always the action that I find offensive. Often it's the fact that someone
who doesn't really know me is making an assumption that I should deal with
a mess that they've chosen not to. Without getting into semantics like
physical ability or age, an owner allowing their dog crap in my yard
without cleaning it up, indicates that the owners time is "too important"
to tend to his responsibility. It say that even on my property, their
needs come first. When I see someone flick ashes out of the window of
their new car, then throws the butt out it screams: "I find a messy car
offensive, here you deal with it okay?" When someone parks their new car
in a crowded lot two spaces is says: "My car is too important to get
scratched so one other person will get to walk two blocks in the rain to
go shopping". If your neighbor blast their stereo at 3am they're
saying: "I don't care about your comfort:

Inconsiderate behavior in general screams a chorus of: "ME! ME! ME! **** YOU!"

And your right, Charlie, I won't waste my time hoping for something "bad"
to happen to these people, but I can't profess to being above smiling at
irony or in worse cases having a lack of compassion when the irony is
cruel. In the case of people inconsiderate with their car, sadly, it
would make me chuckle if someone accidently bumped their car at the light,
scratching their bumper causing them to spill their beverage over their
new interior of the car that they burdened others with to keep pristine.
If the inconsiderate neighbors dog get away and is hit by a car, I will
feel terrible for the dog, and the neighbors kids, but I doubt if any of
my sympathy falls with the neighbor.

From what you write, your a very reasonable person and probably a better
person than I am. You seem like you would be a very nice neighbor to
have. People like yourself server as a good example that I have to
continue to try to be a better person.

I sincerely hope your neighbor realizes how lucky he is and learns to
clean up after his pet without your calls.

Take Care!

Bob

Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 02:19 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
Henry Blackmoore wrote in message news:svUhc.5070

I also own an Australian Cattle dog.



Is her name Karen Smith?


ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Harry Krause April 23rd 04 02:20 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Doug Kanter wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

Henry Blackmoore wrote in message news:svUhc.5070


I also own an Australian Cattle dog.



Is her name Karen Smith?



ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Not ROFL, silly....

WOOF

Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 02:27 AM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

If you were faced with the hypothetical muffler situation I described,

and
you could predict no end to it, you would put a stop to it in any way

you
could before you'd let the neighbor drive you mad from sleep

deprivation.

Not everyone approaches problems the way you describe yourself doing.
It's easy to say there is no way to solve a situation so that then you
can take justice into your own hands.


Justice? Here's the solution to the muffler problem, since you don't seem to
have the energy or the mental capacity to work it out: Call the cops and
explain that the noise ordinances are being violated. The cops, being
stupid, will show up when the act is not being committed. They will tell you
they heard nothing. Repeat the calls to the cops 10 more times. They will
repeat their assertion that they observed no violation. Now, call your local
town justice. Explain that the cops were too busy eating donuts. Explain
also that you told the cops the violation took place every weeknight between
3:15 and 3:30 AM, and that the cops couldn't manage to show up in that 15
minute timespan. The town justice will issue instruct the cops to arrest the
neighbor. If the cops do not arrest the neighbor, they will be in contempt
of court. The neighbor will be taken away in handcuffs and put in a cell for
between 2 and 48 hours, depending on how stupid he is. He will have time to
think about what an asshole he's been. You will never have a problem with
him again. End of story.

Do you need this explained any further?



Do I like his dog coming over here? No, but this solution is acceptable.
I'm happy, the neighbor is happy, and his dog is happy (I presume). I'm
not sitting here with smoke coming out of my ears dreaming up revenge so
I can feel smug about seeing some jerk get what's coming to them.


I have no time for such nonsense. If you're happy with that solution, good
for you. If it were me, I'd invite the neighbor over, shove his face in the
pile of poop, and explain to him that he should review his will at least
every few months to be sure it's up to date, if he intends to continue his
antisocial behavior.

I don't expect you to understand this. I grew up in Queens. Who the hell
knows where you grew up.



Don April 23rd 04 03:18 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote in message
...
"Charles" wrote
Doug Kanter wrote:
"basskisser" wrote
Why not lighten up a little, and listen to the music until the

people
got
back?

Because inconsiderate people make a habit of leaving behind piles of

****
for others to deal with. The behavior should be crushed instantly

and
in
the
most horrifying, shocking and insulting ways.

You're a ticking time bomb.


You say that as if it's a bad thing.



Place mug in CD-ROM drawer. Press CTRL-B for a cold beer, Don.


:-)



Don April 23rd 04 03:19 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Charles" wrote
In many threads you have advocated violent actions against people or
animals you believe to have violated your personal space or rights.


What would your solution be to those things?



Don April 23rd 04 03:21 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
What about YOUR "personal responsibility" to assist other boaters in an
emergency if you can?


How did you transmute *your* into *others*?
Do you even know what personal responsibility means?



Don April 23rd 04 03:25 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider

"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really

ought
to think before you hurl, boy.


Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for a
damaged tomato plant?


Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open yourself up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?



Don April 23rd 04 03:28 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
link.net...

Anybody that would advocate violent action against helpless and

innocent
animals is one sick puppy.

Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on

a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider

"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really

ought
to think before you hurl, boy.


Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food

crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for

a
damaged tomato plant?

I repeat. You are one sick puppy.


Actually, Henry, a garden *does* fall under that definition. These laws

were
almost eliminated as farms began to vanish, but in many places, they were
kept intact because of the victory garden movement during World War II.

The
current legal argument is that flowers have no intrinsic value unless
they're raised by a commercial grower. But, food *does* have value to

anyone
who grows it. Therefore, any food garden is defined as a farm.

Sorry to burst your bubble.....


Doug,
You don't have to go defensive over erroneous claims.
Henry has no more say over your property than you do over his.
Just smear his nose in his own **** and move on.



Don April 23rd 04 03:30 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
Show me where the laws in a suburban area in this country have been
interpreted to allow a homeowner to hide under the guise of growing "food
crops" while killing his neighbors dog or cats? Garden be damned.


The *law* says that if you touch my stuff, I am required to shoot your
stupid ass in the face. Get it?



John Smith April 23rd 04 03:30 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on

a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider

"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really

ought
to think before you hurl, boy.


Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food

crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for

a
damaged tomato plant?


Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open yourself

up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?





Don April 23rd 04 03:31 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...
"Charles" wrote

Keep back-pedalling though.


Keep back-pedalling. It might be helpful in backing away from that line.


Is that a macro?



Don April 23rd 04 03:34 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"DSK" wrote
BTW with regard to the muffler situation, sugar in the gas tank is a
guaranteed way to fix a noisy muffler.


A box of mothball crystals in the gas tank will take care of the owner.
(raises the octane over 5000%)
click...boom....everybodys dead.....



Don April 23rd 04 03:36 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
He is a certifiable menace that's for sure. And he certainly doesn't

belong
on a water in a boat.


Too bad, you have no say in what he does.



Don April 23rd 04 03:39 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
However all kidding aside, if you're defending a vigilante elitest who
admitting would ignore (and means it) a boater in distress and would let

them
sink or die. Then you are no more worthy of being called a boater or a

seaman
than he is.


You seem to be *projecting*.



Don April 23rd 04 03:42 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
I have never had "normal" neighbors. God has chosen to test me
constantly through life. Besides define "normal"?


Are you related to Bush?
GAWD almighty chose him too.
In the future people that believe in fairy tales will be gutted and hung
from lamp posts as deterrents to others.



John Smith April 23rd 04 03:45 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Don,
Again, I am confused, are you saying if your neighbors dog takes a crap in
your lawn, you are required by law to shot him in the face?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
Show me where the laws in a suburban area in this country have been
interpreted to allow a homeowner to hide under the guise of growing

"food
crops" while killing his neighbors dog or cats? Garden be damned.


The *law* says that if you touch my stuff, I am required to shoot your
stupid ass in the face. Get it?





Don April 23rd 04 03:51 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote

Wait a minute, awhile back you said:
************************************************** ***
I also live in Sugar Land. And no, one cannot take firearms out into the
backyard and practice with live rounds. Not even a BB gun for that matter.
You have watched too many westerns on your boob tube.
************************************************** ***

And now you're saying that people CAN shoot guns in their backyards:
************************************************** ***
LoL, actually I have a police officer neighbor a few door away that

shoots
snakes in his yard. He is deathly afraid of snakes and his house backs
up to a bayou.

************************************************** ***

So the question is, were you lying then, or are you lying now?
Please consult your boob tube if necessary.





Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 04:41 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Don" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Doug Kanter"

wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
link.net...

Anybody that would advocate violent action against helpless and

innocent
animals is one sick puppy.

Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts

on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider

"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as

the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You

really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food

crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets

for
a
damaged tomato plant?

I repeat. You are one sick puppy.


Actually, Henry, a garden *does* fall under that definition. These laws

were
almost eliminated as farms began to vanish, but in many places, they

were
kept intact because of the victory garden movement during World War II.

The
current legal argument is that flowers have no intrinsic value unless
they're raised by a commercial grower. But, food *does* have value to

anyone
who grows it. Therefore, any food garden is defined as a farm.

Sorry to burst your bubble.....


Doug,
You don't have to go defensive over erroneous claims.
Henry has no more say over your property than you do over his.
Just smear his nose in his own **** and move on.



I'm simply helping him understand laws he is 100% unfamiliar with. The same
laws I've become 100% familiar with in order to enjoy the simple pleasure of
a vegetable garden in the midst of a few neighbors who don't care.



Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 04:49 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


This is simple, John. Based on actual experience:

I'm working in the garden. I have 3 neighbors with little target dogs, like
dachshunds. I cut my lawn correctly in the summer, which means 3-4". The
target dogs' turds are small enough to fall beneath the level of the grass.
I step in it. I'm preoccupied with gardening. I am entitled to focus only on
the thing I enjoy, rather than having to watch every step I take. I step in
the turds, and run into the house for a drink of water, and maybe to use the
bathroom. Now, there's turd on my carpet. I have to stop what I'm doing and
rent a rug shampooer.

Not only does the machine cost money, but the dog owner has stolen 3-4 hours
of my precious time. If I apply my working rate to my weekend hours, that
time is worth between $500 and $10,000.00. The dog owner has stolen that
from me.

Get it? Stealing. Why? So the dog owner can keep his fat ass on the sofa
watching football, rather than tie the dog up in his own backyard and clean
the turds out of his damned lawn. Calling the dog catcher a dozen times
achieved nothing. "Duh...I have to actually witness the dog running loose
before I can do anything about it". This is why one dog on my street
actually vanished about 15 years ago. Sort of like Jimmy Hoffa.

My property, my garden, my time, my money. No different than if you did a
gorgeous job of painting your house and I came along with a painball gun and
redecorated it for you. Get it? Same exact thing.



Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 04:53 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
He is a certifiable menace that's for sure. And he certainly doesn't

belong
on a water in a boat.


Too bad, you have no say in what he does.



Actually, I give anchored fishermen a berth so wide, they hardly know I'm
there. I've taught my son to assist other boaters who are docking, or stay
out of their ways if they don't want help. I keep unused bait nice & fresh,
because there are always kids back at the dock who seem to find it useful.
When fishing streams, I not only stay hundreds of feet from other fishermen,
I don't even say hello unless their body language indicates they're in the
mood to share info. I go over my outboard with a friggin' toothbrush after I
change oil so I don't create the oil slick that some guys think is macho.
(Same guys who don't flush the toilet in public bathrooms).

Henry has no idea what he's talking about.



John Smith April 23rd 04 04:59 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Doug,

So you do agree with Don that a person who allows a dog to crap on your
lawn, is the same thing as your neighbor coming over to your house and
sexually molesting your daughter?

Do you also agree with Don, that the law requires you to shot the person in
the face if their dog craps in your lawn?


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


This is simple, John. Based on actual experience:

I'm working in the garden. I have 3 neighbors with little target dogs,

like
dachshunds. I cut my lawn correctly in the summer, which means 3-4". The
target dogs' turds are small enough to fall beneath the level of the

grass.
I step in it. I'm preoccupied with gardening. I am entitled to focus only

on
the thing I enjoy, rather than having to watch every step I take. I step

in
the turds, and run into the house for a drink of water, and maybe to use

the
bathroom. Now, there's turd on my carpet. I have to stop what I'm doing

and
rent a rug shampooer.

Not only does the machine cost money, but the dog owner has stolen 3-4

hours
of my precious time. If I apply my working rate to my weekend hours, that
time is worth between $500 and $10,000.00. The dog owner has stolen that
from me.

Get it? Stealing. Why? So the dog owner can keep his fat ass on the sofa
watching football, rather than tie the dog up in his own backyard and

clean
the turds out of his damned lawn. Calling the dog catcher a dozen times
achieved nothing. "Duh...I have to actually witness the dog running loose
before I can do anything about it". This is why one dog on my street
actually vanished about 15 years ago. Sort of like Jimmy Hoffa.

My property, my garden, my time, my money. No different than if you did a
gorgeous job of painting your house and I came along with a painball gun

and
redecorated it for you. Get it? Same exact thing.





Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 05:17 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Fw0ic.5465$cF6.293888@attbi_s04...
Doug,

So you do agree with Don that a person who allows a dog to crap on your
lawn, is the same thing as your neighbor coming over to your house and
sexually molesting your daughter?

Do you also agree with Don, that the law requires you to shot the person

in
the face if their dog craps in your lawn?


If you ask a neighbor to control its dog and the neighbor refuses, then yes.
It is equivalent to molesting your daughter. I do NOT agree that the
neighbor should be shot. However, you must realize that by refusing to
cooperate, the neighbor has made a request. He has asked you to bring all
possible legal forces to bear on him as quickly as possible. If you do not
honor his explicit request, then YOU are a bad neighbor. It's your job to
involve the police, animal control people and courts immediately, the goal
being to remove the animal from the home, extract a huge fine, and cause as
much heartbreak as possible at the loss of a pet. Remember: You are honoring
the neighbor's explicit request. As a side benefit, you will help his
children learn something which he was too stupid or lazy to teach them -
owning a pet involves work.

Dog owners like that really don't want to own pets. They probably get dogs
because someone else in the house wanted one, but was also too lazy to care
for it correctly. In rural areas, it may be safe and legal* to shoot the
dog. Obviously, it's your responsibility to do just that, to honor your
neighbor's request.

*Safe and legal: Proper distance from highways and property lines, and
sufficient land incline to guarantee a bullet will not travel too far and
hit a worthwhile animal, like a rat, a slug or a snake.



Don April 23rd 04 06:20 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
John, you better straighten up your act or you will be sent to the corner
for contemplation.
Where in my single sentence below did I mention dogs?

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:vr%hc.5371$YP5.524839@attbi_s02...
Don,
Again, I am confused, are you saying if your neighbors dog takes a crap in
your lawn, you are required by law to shot him in the face?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
Show me where the laws in a suburban area in this country have been
interpreted to allow a homeowner to hide under the guise of growing

"food
crops" while killing his neighbors dog or cats? Garden be damned.


The *law* says that if you touch my stuff, I am required to shoot your
stupid ass in the face. Get it?







Don April 23rd 04 06:23 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
link.net...

Anybody that would advocate violent action against helpless and
innocent
animals is one sick puppy.

Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the

courts
on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as

the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You

really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food

crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets

for
a
damaged tomato plant?

I repeat. You are one sick puppy.

Actually, Henry, a garden *does* fall under that definition. These

laws
were
almost eliminated as farms began to vanish, but in many places, they

were
kept intact because of the victory garden movement during World War

II.
The
current legal argument is that flowers have no intrinsic value unless
they're raised by a commercial grower. But, food *does* have value to

anyone
who grows it. Therefore, any food garden is defined as a farm.

Sorry to burst your bubble.....


Doug,
You don't have to go defensive over erroneous claims.
Henry has no more say over your property than you do over his.
Just smear his nose in his own **** and move on.



I'm simply helping him understand laws he is 100% unfamiliar with. The

same
laws I've become 100% familiar with in order to enjoy the simple pleasure

of
a vegetable garden in the midst of a few neighbors who don't care.


sigh
It's not your job to educate morons, though you may choose to do so for
hobby.
The *law* has nothing to do with it.
We're talking about *morality* here.
If Blackmoore chooses to act immorally and infringe on your *natural*
rights, you just plug him and turn him into fertilizer.
There are way too many Blackmoores running loose anyway.



Don April 23rd 04 06:25 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?
I said that if you choose to use MY stuff to YOUR benefit than I have the
moral equivilent to do the same.
John, PLEASE think these things through before reacting emotionally.

"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts

on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider

"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as

the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You

really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food

crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets

for
a
damaged tomato plant?


Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open

yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?







Don April 23rd 04 06:31 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
What the **** is it with you John?
What the hell difference does it make if Doug agrees with me?
Don't you have a brain of your own?
Don't you have a backbone?
We're not talking rocket surgery here, just very simple basics.
Most kids are taught these things at about age 5, how old are you?
Here, I'll spell it out for you:
*Treat other people as you want to be treated.*
There, is that simple enough?
If you abuse that one simple rule of humanity you may pay a severe
consequence.
Don't let your dog **** in my yard, don't paintball my house, don't fondle
my daughter, etc.
In turn I won't do those things to you.
Does any of this make sense to you?



"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Fw0ic.5465$cF6.293888@attbi_s04...
Doug,

So you do agree with Don that a person who allows a dog to crap on your
lawn, is the same thing as your neighbor coming over to your house and
sexually molesting your daughter?

Do you also agree with Don, that the law requires you to shot the person

in
the face if their dog craps in your lawn?


"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
news:Cd%hc.16820$GR.2456214@attbi_s01...
Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I

can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same

as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


This is simple, John. Based on actual experience:

I'm working in the garden. I have 3 neighbors with little target dogs,

like
dachshunds. I cut my lawn correctly in the summer, which means 3-4". The
target dogs' turds are small enough to fall beneath the level of the

grass.
I step in it. I'm preoccupied with gardening. I am entitled to focus

only
on
the thing I enjoy, rather than having to watch every step I take. I step

in
the turds, and run into the house for a drink of water, and maybe to use

the
bathroom. Now, there's turd on my carpet. I have to stop what I'm doing

and
rent a rug shampooer.

Not only does the machine cost money, but the dog owner has stolen 3-4

hours
of my precious time. If I apply my working rate to my weekend hours,

that
time is worth between $500 and $10,000.00. The dog owner has stolen that
from me.

Get it? Stealing. Why? So the dog owner can keep his fat ass on the sofa
watching football, rather than tie the dog up in his own backyard and

clean
the turds out of his damned lawn. Calling the dog catcher a dozen times
achieved nothing. "Duh...I have to actually witness the dog running

loose
before I can do anything about it". This is why one dog on my street
actually vanished about 15 years ago. Sort of like Jimmy Hoffa.

My property, my garden, my time, my money. No different than if you did

a
gorgeous job of painting your house and I came along with a painball gun

and
redecorated it for you. Get it? Same exact thing.







Don April 23rd 04 06:35 AM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
He is a certifiable menace that's for sure. And he certainly doesn't

belong
on a water in a boat.


Too bad, you have no say in what he does.



Actually, I give anchored fishermen a berth so wide, they hardly know I'm
there. I've taught my son to assist other boaters who are docking, or stay
out of their ways if they don't want help. I keep unused bait nice &

fresh,
because there are always kids back at the dock who seem to find it useful.
When fishing streams, I not only stay hundreds of feet from other

fishermen,
I don't even say hello unless their body language indicates they're in the
mood to share info. I go over my outboard with a friggin' toothbrush after

I
change oil so I don't create the oil slick that some guys think is macho.
(Same guys who don't flush the toilet in public bathrooms).

Henry has no idea what he's talking about.


Do as you please.
You have to answer to no other, let alone a moron in Usenet.
Blackmoore presents his false bravado as a symbol of his cowardice and poor
character.
Blackmoore is one of the last people to help when help is needed, so he
shadows himself in his false accusations of others.



Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 12:07 PM

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 01:27:20 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

I have no time for such nonsense. If you're happy with that solution,

good
for you. If it were me, I'd invite the neighbor over, shove his face in

the
pile of poop, and explain to him that he should review his will at least
every few months to be sure it's up to date, if he intends to continue

his
antisocial behavior.


LOL !


Isn't moral relativity a stitch? :-)



Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 12:25 PM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Don" wrote in message
...

Doug,
You don't have to go defensive over erroneous claims.
Henry has no more say over your property than you do over his.
Just smear his nose in his own **** and move on.



I'm simply helping him understand laws he is 100% unfamiliar with. The

same
laws I've become 100% familiar with in order to enjoy the simple

pleasure
of
a vegetable garden in the midst of a few neighbors who don't care.


sigh
It's not your job to educate morons, though you may choose to do so for
hobby.
The *law* has nothing to do with it.
We're talking about *morality* here.
If Blackmoore chooses to act immorally and infringe on your *natural*
rights, you just plug him and turn him into fertilizer.
There are way too many Blackmoores running loose anyway.



Morality, yes. But, in some cases, the law reflects basic moral issues which
continue to be important to people. Henry has apparently created nothing
worth preserving, therefore he is having extreme difficulty grasping this
issue. Fortunately, the courts do NOT share this handicap. Henry should
invite his lawyer to dinner and request an education. Better yet, he should
head to his town/city hall and spend an afternoon browsing through his local
laws. It'll be a real eye opener.



Doug Kanter April 23rd 04 12:29 PM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
"Don" wrote in message
...
Geezis, what the hell is going on around here?


Don, there is either a dense fog around here, or there's a second thing
going on. Henry may have tipped his hand somewhere in this conversation when
he said "you reap what you sow", but refused to admit that sometimes you
reap your uncomfortable harvest right away. The alternative is "later". Now,
what kinds of people have built an entire belief system around "later"? I'd
be specific, but I don't want to spoil a surprise that Henry himself will
provide elsewhere in this thread. :-)



Dave Hall April 23rd 04 12:40 PM

When would you board someone else's boat??
 
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:45:09 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004 15:56:38 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
.. .

Some people bitch a bit too much. Learn to cut some slack and deal
with it.

We both know why you jumped into THIS particular discussion, don't we,

Dave?
:-)


No, why don't you tell us?

Dave


No, Dave. It's not my job to help you with these things.


You're the one who posed the supposedly rhetorical question. By your
act of doing so, you are then taking on the role of "all-knowing".
Consequently, I gave you the chance to validate your statement, by
further imparting your wisdom on us. Since you chose not to, I'll have
to correct my earlier assumption.......

Dave
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com