LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
DSK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jeff Rigby wrote:
Then he doesn't have to borrow the money and your statement was in
error?????


Of course not.

... If the money is there he doesn't to have to borrow it!


Uh huh. And since when did the Bush Administration propose a budget that
was anything close to balanced?

... You
can't have it both ways.


I'm not the one trying to have it "both" ways. I am trying to
familiarize you (and a few others) with a few basic facts, & introduce
some fairly simple & straightforward logic.

You are insisting that
1- US treasury bonds are somehow "worthless" when the fact is that they
are the most secure investment available.
2- If Bush can somehow make Social Security go bust all the sooner, that
the gov't will be forced to stop borrowing money.
3- that the above two points are actually sensible.


The SS fund has a surplus, more money coming in than is being spent on SS.


Correct.

This money can't be used for the Bush SS plan because it's being spent to
finance other areas of the Federal government.


Wrong.

This is like saying that you own your neighbor's house, because the
money the bank loaned him on his mortgage came out of your checking account.


Beware the most vocal in criticizing Bush's plan for they have eyes on the
SS money and want to spend it on their pet projects.


Wrong. The most vocal critics of Bush's SS plan are the ones who don't
want Social Security to go bust all the sooner, and who have the fiscal
responsibility to not want to run up an even larger deficit to make up
the difference in SS income/payouts.



The deficit spendinginflation/sliding scale income tax system that was
started in the 60's breaks down if congress reduces the tax rates or if we
don't have inflation above interest rates that are paid by treasury notes.


???

That almost sounds like an intelligent statement. But I suspect it's
another one of those delusions which you can't let go of.

Please explain further. Also explain why we haven't had this "breakdown"
when we've actually had inflation rates below Treasury return rates many
times over the past 40 years, inlcuding for about the last 10 ~ 12.

DSK



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INFO FOR NEWBIES Capt. Mooron ASA 20 March 19th 05 04:20 AM
More bad news for Bush, good news for Americans John Smith General 7 June 25th 04 06:10 PM
OT - FLIP-FLOPPING MAY HAVE INJURED KERRY’S SHOULDER Henry Blackmoore General 3 April 7th 04 11:03 PM
OT--Not again! More Chinese money buying our politicians. NOYB General 23 February 6th 04 05:01 PM
Bush Resume Bobsprit ASA 21 September 15th 03 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017