John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 13:21:49 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

wrote:
John H wrote:

On 14 May 2005 10:22:49 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:


Gosh, with all the comments about this particular post, I just
had

to

find and

read it Harry.

What a trip! From Deale to Tangier is almost 100 miles. And wow,

five

hours to

get to and from, time for a walk around town and a lunch, and
you

even did some

striper and other bottom fishing, just drifting and casting to

structure.

What a day!

Harry, which of the right-wingers here expressed the worst
wishes

for

this

eventful 'day' trip? Shame on them.

Now me? I'd be wondering how the hell you did all that!!!!!
--
John H


John, do you think that your above negativity is helping the
"tone"

of

the newsgroup?

Negativity? I'm patting the man on the back! No one I know could

possibly do all

that in one day!


So, you don't think that when you slam every single post a man
makes,
that that isn't seen in a negative light? Do you think
automatically
finding fault with any and everything a certain person says is a
good
plan for the "tone of the group"?



Herring has no interest whatsoever in "improving the tone" of this
newsgroup, and neither do any of his "associates" here. Their only
interest is in disruption and in attempting to drive away those who
do
not adhere to a mindless, right-wing mindset.

Herring is the kind of white man native Americans used to say,
"speaks
with forked tongue." Rather than raising the level, he and his
associates are intent on bringing everyone down where they are.

It's one of the many symptoms of being Smithered.

Harry, my praise for your accomplishments and your name-calling had
nothing to
do with politics. And, I'd love to see the tone of the group
improved. It won't
happen when you continue your name-calling behavior. Why not more
posts like the
one with the maps?
--
John H

John, it also won't happen when someone posts, and you start spewing
profanity.

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 10:14:17 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 May 2005 10:22:49 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:

Gosh, with all the comments about this particular post, I just
had
to
find and
read it Harry.

What a trip! From Deale to Tangier is almost 100 miles. And
wow,
five
hours to
get to and from, time for a walk around town and a lunch, and
you
even did some
striper and other bottom fishing, just drifting and casting to
structure.

What a day!

Harry, which of the right-wingers here expressed the worst
wishes
for
this
eventful 'day' trip? Shame on them.

Now me? I'd be wondering how the hell you did all that!!!!!
--
John H

John, do you think that your above negativity is helping the
"tone"
of
the newsgroup?

Negativity? I'm patting the man on the back! No one I know could
possibly do all
that in one day!

So, you don't think that when you slam every single post a man
makes,
that that isn't seen in a negative light? Do you think automatically
finding fault with any and everything a certain person says is a
good
plan for the "tone of the group"?

Can you please point out the 'negativity' in the post above?
--
John H


Do you actually think that people here are dumb enough to believe that
your above posts wasn't meant to try and humiliate, put down and
otherwise slam a post about a boating trip? Maybe Fritz is that stupid,
but that's about it. Would you think that if every single post you
made, about boating, or not, was met with the same contempt as you use,
that it would be a positive "tone" for the newsgroup?

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 10:14:17 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 May 2005 10:22:49 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:

Gosh, with all the comments about this particular post, I just
had
to
find and
read it Harry.

What a trip! From Deale to Tangier is almost 100 miles. And
wow,
five
hours to
get to and from, time for a walk around town and a lunch, and
you
even did some
striper and other bottom fishing, just drifting and casting to
structure.

What a day!

Harry, which of the right-wingers here expressed the worst
wishes
for
this
eventful 'day' trip? Shame on them.

Now me? I'd be wondering how the hell you did all that!!!!!
--
John H

John, do you think that your above negativity is helping the
"tone"
of
the newsgroup?

Negativity? I'm patting the man on the back! No one I know could
possibly do all
that in one day!

So, you don't think that when you slam every single post a man
makes,
that that isn't seen in a negative light? Do you think automatically
finding fault with any and everything a certain person says is a
good
plan for the "tone of the group"?

Can you please point out the 'negativity' in the post above?
--
John H


Do you actually think that people here are dumb enough to believe that
your above posts wasn't meant to try and humiliate, put down and
otherwise slam a post about a boating trip? Maybe Fritz is that stupid,
but that's about it. Would you think that if every single post you
made, about boating, or not, was met with the same contempt as you use,
that it would be a positive "tone" for the newsgroup?


What does this have to do with boats? In fact, what do any of your posts
have to do with boats?

John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:31:17 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:37:50 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:


On Mon, 16 May 2005 11:39:35 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



You twerps ought to rent a brain. You've once again been taken in
by one
of your own kind, a "Smithers" who posts on here using my name
and an
email address I have used.

Check the headers, twerps. It ain't me.


I have, thus far, been unable to filter out these vandals using
*any*
newsreader. Therefore, I loaded my own news server software to
make
use of its filtering capability... which includes filtering of all
headers, attachments, and the body using strings and/or regex.

I have been running parallel readers and it looks like I have
nearly
100% filter rate on the miscreants.

What has this got to do with the reader? You can read rec.boats
from
my web page and/or point your newsreader to my server.....

...... either way, you'll see almost no posts from the newsgroup
vandals...


Gene, although I don't currently have him filtered, filtering
Harry *does*
greatly cut down on the number of malicious posts getting picked
up.


There you go again.

No, no. You've been pretty good lately. That's why you're not
currently
filtered. Of course the fake isn't either, but even *he* has been
pretty good
for the past few days.

You've got to admit that many, many of your posts *were* malicious.
--
John H

As *were* YOURS. Do you remember awhile back, that you said that you
hadn't resorted in name calling for "quite awhile", and that made you
practically innocent? Pot calling the kettle black, perhaps?

"JimH" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ups.com...

John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 10:14:17 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 May 2005 10:22:49 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:

Gosh, with all the comments about this particular post, I just
had
to
find and
read it Harry.

What a trip! From Deale to Tangier is almost 100 miles. And
wow,
five
hours to
get to and from, time for a walk around town and a lunch, and
you
even did some
striper and other bottom fishing, just drifting and casting to
structure.

What a day!

Harry, which of the right-wingers here expressed the worst
wishes
for
this
eventful 'day' trip? Shame on them.

Now me? I'd be wondering how the hell you did all that!!!!!
--
John H

John, do you think that your above negativity is helping the
"tone"
of
the newsgroup?

Negativity? I'm patting the man on the back! No one I know could
possibly do all
that in one day!

So, you don't think that when you slam every single post a man
makes,
that that isn't seen in a negative light? Do you think automatically
finding fault with any and everything a certain person says is a
good
plan for the "tone of the group"?

Can you please point out the 'negativity' in the post above?
--
John H


Do you actually think that people here are dumb enough to believe that
your above posts wasn't meant to try and humiliate, put down and
otherwise slam a post about a boating trip? Maybe Fritz is that stupid,
but that's about it. Would you think that if every single post you
made, about boating, or not, was met with the same contempt as you use,
that it would be a positive "tone" for the newsgroup?


What does this have to do with boats? In fact, what do any of your posts
have to do with boats?

Poor kevin, still out to prove he is the "King of the NG idiots"

He still can't see the light through that brown fog he is constantly looking
through.......or maybe it is he's been delving into the cash crops again

On 17 May 2005 05:58:08 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:31:17 -0400, "Harry.Krause"

wrote:

John H wrote:
On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:37:50 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:


On Mon, 16 May 2005 11:39:35 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:



You twerps ought to rent a brain. You've once again been taken in
by one
of your own kind, a "Smithers" who posts on here using my name
and an
email address I have used.

Check the headers, twerps. It ain't me.


I have, thus far, been unable to filter out these vandals using
*any*
newsreader. Therefore, I loaded my own news server software to
make
use of its filtering capability... which includes filtering of all
headers, attachments, and the body using strings and/or regex.

I have been running parallel readers and it looks like I have
nearly
100% filter rate on the miscreants.

What has this got to do with the reader? You can read rec.boats
from
my web page and/or point your newsreader to my server.....

...... either way, you'll see almost no posts from the newsgroup
vandals...


Gene, although I don't currently have him filtered, filtering
Harry *does*
greatly cut down on the number of malicious posts getting picked
up.


There you go again.

No, no. You've been pretty good lately. That's why you're not
currently
filtered. Of course the fake isn't either, but even *he* has been
pretty good
for the past few days.

You've got to admit that many, many of your posts *were* malicious.
--
John H

As *were* YOURS. Do you remember awhile back, that you said that you
hadn't resorted in name calling for "quite awhile", and that made you
practically innocent? Pot calling the kettle black, perhaps?

First, did anyone invite you into this discussion?

Second, if you'll recall (and I *think* you can) I apologized for my bad
behavior. Did that slip your mind?

--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 17 May 2005 05:52:18 -0700, wrote:

John, it also won't happen when someone posts, and you start spewing
profanity.

See earlier. Have *you* ever apologized for your profanity?
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On 17 May 2005 05:55:57 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 16 May 2005 10:14:17 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:
On 14 May 2005 10:22:49 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:

Gosh, with all the comments about this particular post, I just
had
to
find and
read it Harry.

What a trip! From Deale to Tangier is almost 100 miles. And
wow,
five
hours to
get to and from, time for a walk around town and a lunch, and
you
even did some
striper and other bottom fishing, just drifting and casting to
structure.

What a day!

Harry, which of the right-wingers here expressed the worst
wishes
for
this
eventful 'day' trip? Shame on them.

Now me? I'd be wondering how the hell you did all that!!!!!
--
John H

John, do you think that your above negativity is helping the
"tone"
of
the newsgroup?

Negativity? I'm patting the man on the back! No one I know could
possibly do all
that in one day!

So, you don't think that when you slam every single post a man
makes,
that that isn't seen in a negative light? Do you think automatically
finding fault with any and everything a certain person says is a
good
plan for the "tone of the group"?

Can you please point out the 'negativity' in the post above?
--
John H


Do you actually think that people here are dumb enough to believe that
your above posts wasn't meant to try and humiliate, put down and
otherwise slam a post about a boating trip? Maybe Fritz is that stupid,
but that's about it. Would you think that if every single post you
made, about boating, or not, was met with the same contempt as you use,
that it would be a positive "tone" for the newsgroup?

Not surprisingly, you missed the whole point.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:12:55 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:
On 17 May 2005 05:58:08 -0700, wrote:


John H wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2005 17:31:17 -0400, "Harry.Krause"



wrote:


John H wrote:

On Mon, 16 May 2005 20:37:50 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:



On Mon, 16 May 2005 11:39:35 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:




You twerps ought to rent a brain. You've once again been taken in

by one

of your own kind, a "Smithers" who posts on here using my name

and an

email address I have used.

Check the headers, twerps. It ain't me.


I have, thus far, been unable to filter out these vandals using

*any*

newsreader. Therefore, I loaded my own news server software to

make

use of its filtering capability... which includes filtering of all
headers, attachments, and the body using strings and/or regex.

I have been running parallel readers and it looks like I have

nearly

100% filter rate on the miscreants.

What has this got to do with the reader? You can read rec.boats

from

my web page and/or point your newsreader to my server.....

...... either way, you'll see almost no posts from the newsgroup
vandals...


Gene, although I don't currently have him filtered, filtering

Harry *does*

greatly cut down on the number of malicious posts getting picked

up.


There you go again.

No, no. You've been pretty good lately. That's why you're not

currently

filtered. Of course the fake isn't either, but even *he* has been

pretty good

for the past few days.

You've got to admit that many, many of your posts *were* malicious.
--
John H


As *were* YOURS. Do you remember awhile back, that you said that you
hadn't resorted in name calling for "quite awhile", and that made you
practically innocent? Pot calling the kettle black, perhaps?


First, did anyone invite you into this discussion?

Second, if you'll recall (and I *think* you can) I apologized for my bad
behavior. Did that slip your mind?




Why not just let this die a natural death, eh? It really serves no purpose.

Until bk brought it up, I thought it had!
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."

On Tue, 17 May 2005 10:48:04 -0400, "Harry.Krause"
wrote:

John H wrote:

Why not just let this die a natural death, eh? It really serves no purpose.


Until bk brought it up, I thought it had!
--


I'm referring to the silliness with bassy, not to the subject of any
particular post. This incessant trading of insults that goes on between
bass and you and Hertvik and Fritz makes all of you look like pimply
fifth-graders.

We need more high-class insulting here. Or something.

******************************

No, we don't need *any* insulting. I didn't insult basskisser in my response to
his insult. I pointed out that I had apologized for bad behavior.

As to your contention above, did you purposely omit yourself from the list of
those who participate in the 'incessant trading of insults'? (Just asking, mind
you.) I do agree that the trading of insults serves no purpose.
--
John H

"All decisions are the result of binary thinking."