Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Scott Weiser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/5/05 5:32 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott recommends:
============
Hire another teacher or put the disabled students in a Grade 1 math
class.
============

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the budget surplus.


It's not a matter of budgets, it's a matter of social priorities.


Cough. Sputter. Cough

Did SCOTT WEISER just say that?

He's becoming...gasp...a SOCIALIST right before our eyes!!!!


Social priorities is not socialism.


Put Scott in charge of the school system, and each person with an
intellectual disability will be mainstreamed with their own personal
teacher! If the school needs 483 teachers for 600 students, so be it! It's a
social priority!


Well, only if they can afford it and are willing to pay for it. I also
recognize that it is the taxpayers who are in charge of things, and if The
People don't set education as a social priority, they have every right to
end up with ignorant children. That's democracy for you!


Now howsabout ensuring access to health care for every child in
America...BEFORE your "a teacher for everyone" program kicks in?


I'm not opposed to providing public health care for poor children. However,
if you can pay for it, or can afford private insurance to cover it, you
should pay for it. Only if you can demonstrably and verifiably not pay for
it should your children get public medical assistance.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

  #2   Report Post  
KMAN
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Scott Weiser" wrote in message
...
A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/5/05 5:32 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott recommends:
============
Hire another teacher or put the disabled students in a Grade 1 math
class.
============

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the budget surplus.

It's not a matter of budgets, it's a matter of social priorities.


Cough. Sputter. Cough

Did SCOTT WEISER just say that?

He's becoming...gasp...a SOCIALIST right before our eyes!!!!


Social priorities is not socialism.


No! But you want to force taxpayers to support social needs!


Put Scott in charge of the school system, and each person with an
intellectual disability will be mainstreamed with their own personal
teacher! If the school needs 483 teachers for 600 students, so be it!
It's a
social priority!


Well, only if they can afford it and are willing to pay for it.


Good luck with that!

I also
recognize that it is the taxpayers who are in charge of things, and if The
People don't set education as a social priority, they have every right to
end up with ignorant children. That's democracy for you!


Great!


Now howsabout ensuring access to health care for every child in
America...BEFORE your "a teacher for everyone" program kicks in?


I'm not opposed to providing public health care for poor children.
However,
if you can pay for it, or can afford private insurance to cover it, you
should pay for it. Only if you can demonstrably and verifiably not pay for
it should your children get public medical assistance.


Good luck with that!


  #3   Report Post  
Scott Weiser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:


"Scott Weiser" wrote in message
...
A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/5/05 5:32 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott recommends:
============
Hire another teacher or put the disabled students in a Grade 1 math
class.
============

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the budget surplus.

It's not a matter of budgets, it's a matter of social priorities.

Cough. Sputter. Cough

Did SCOTT WEISER just say that?

He's becoming...gasp...a SOCIALIST right before our eyes!!!!


Social priorities is not socialism.


No! But you want to force taxpayers to support social needs!


Of course. I'm not an anarchist. "That to secure these liberties,
governments are instituted among men" is not a call to socialism, but it is
a recognition that people must be governed. And for government to function,
the people have to pay for it. Thus, levying taxes is perfectly correct. The
question is WHO authorizes the extraction of taxes to support government
programs, and HOW they go about doing so.



Put Scott in charge of the school system, and each person with an
intellectual disability will be mainstreamed with their own personal
teacher! If the school needs 483 teachers for 600 students, so be it!
It's a
social priority!


Well, only if they can afford it and are willing to pay for it.


Good luck with that!


Then they get ignorant, uncontrollable children. Petard hoist.


--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

  #4   Report Post  
KMAN
 
Posts: n/a
Default

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/12/05 6:39 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:


"Scott Weiser" wrote in message
...
A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 4/5/05 5:32 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott recommends:
============
Hire another teacher or put the disabled students in a Grade 1 math
class.
============

Oh yeah, I totally forgot about the budget surplus.

It's not a matter of budgets, it's a matter of social priorities.

Cough. Sputter. Cough

Did SCOTT WEISER just say that?

He's becoming...gasp...a SOCIALIST right before our eyes!!!!

Social priorities is not socialism.


No! But you want to force taxpayers to support social needs!


Of course. I'm not an anarchist. "That to secure these liberties,
governments are instituted among men" is not a call to socialism, but it is
a recognition that people must be governed. And for government to function,
the people have to pay for it. Thus, levying taxes is perfectly correct. The
question is WHO authorizes the extraction of taxes to support government
programs, and HOW they go about doing so.


Oho. So it's not quite so crystal clear where supporting social needs is
appropriate and where it becomes a horrific commie plot.



Put Scott in charge of the school system, and each person with an
intellectual disability will be mainstreamed with their own personal
teacher! If the school needs 483 teachers for 600 students, so be it!
It's a
social priority!

Well, only if they can afford it and are willing to pay for it.


Good luck with that!


Then they get ignorant, uncontrollable children. Petard hoist.


Is that how we got you?

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry basskisser General 125 October 4th 04 09:22 PM
Bush fiddles while health care burns Harry Krause General 71 September 17th 04 10:21 PM
OT- Ode to Immigration Harry Krause General 83 July 27th 04 06:37 PM
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! NOYB General 25 March 15th 04 08:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017