Scott to KMAN:
================
I'm talking about students with intellectual disabilitiesin high
school, and
have been throughout.

Yes, you've been trying manfully to divert the discussion, but I'm not
playing.
====================

Scott, the discussion you wish to have may/will be useful, but it is
disingenuous to accuse KMAN of trying to divert it. You're the one
doing the diverting (and that's OK, it just complicates the issue).

frtzw906

A Usenet persona calling itself BCITORGB wrote:

Scott to KMAN:
================
I'm talking about students with intellectual disabilitiesin high
school, and
have been throughout.

Yes, you've been trying manfully to divert the discussion, but I'm not
playing.
====================

Scott, the discussion you wish to have may/will be useful, but it is
disingenuous to accuse KMAN of trying to divert it. You're the one
doing the diverting (and that's OK, it just complicates the issue).

Wrong. I've always been arguing policy and the general case.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

Scott:
===========
Wrong. I've always been arguing policy and the general case.
==============

Fine.

And KMAN and I haven't. And we've understood one another. Perhaps
because we speak Canajun and you don't

frtzw906.