| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:
On 30-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote: It's "national" in that the rules under which hospitals must operate are promulgated by the federal government, which funds and regulates the system. You are so ignorant. The federal government does not fund the sustem, nor does it regulate it. Sure it does. It provides some funding and defines minimal standards. It defines more than "minimal standards." It defines who get medical care and when. However, health care is a provincial jurisdiction and most funding comes from provincial governments. And provincial governments are controlled by the federal government. Otherwise, provinces could opt out of the national health care system. They can't. Socialized medicine is, by definition, centrally-controlled, even if no "central" list is kept. Canada's must not be socialized, since there's no central control. Sure there is. Any government. All government. You sound very paranoid. Nah, just realistic. I doubt it. It's my guess that once you get assigned a priority, based on the government-mandated priority criteria, you're stuck with it, and no matter where you go, you end up behind others with higher priority. You are making this up as you go along. Too bad you don't care about facts - the discussion would be a lot shorter if you did. Hey, I said it was my guess. You're the one who replied. There is no priority list! Of course there is, and the teenage girl and old guy with bad knees are on the bottom of it. Priorities are set by the doctors and hospitals. You can get a different result by dealing with a different doctor. Not all referring physicians have equal access to all surgeons - they are a good old boy network and some have better access to some than others. Not according to the AP. I believe the AP, not you. Example - Toronto's top ophthalmologist is very hard to see. He specializes in difficult cases. A friend of mine (a doctor) had a problem with his nephew and could not get an appointment with the specialist in a timely manner - his nephew ended up getting treatment with another specialist. My doctor had a concern about me and got me an appointment with the same top ophthalmologist in a week. It all depends on who you know. No government involved. No list involved. Did the nephew require hospitalization and surgery? If not, your anecdote is irrelevant. However, this is a guess, and I could be wrong. No kidding - you're wrong more often than you're right. That doesn't stop you from posting your bull****. Nor does it keep you from eating it up with some fava beans and a nice Chianti. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM Š 2005 Scott Weiser |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
| Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
| OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
| OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General | |||