LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Scott Weiser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:


On 30-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

It's "national" in that the rules under which hospitals must operate are
promulgated by the federal government, which funds and regulates the system.


You are so ignorant. The federal government does not fund the sustem, nor
does it regulate it.


Sure it does.

It provides some funding and defines minimal standards.


It defines more than "minimal standards." It defines who get medical care
and when.

However, health care is a provincial jurisdiction and most funding comes
from provincial governments.


And provincial governments are controlled by the federal government.
Otherwise, provinces could opt out of the national health care system. They
can't.


Socialized medicine is, by definition, centrally-controlled, even
if no "central" list is kept.


Canada's must not be socialized, since there's no central control.


Sure there is.


Any government. All government.


You sound very paranoid.


Nah, just realistic.


I doubt it. It's my guess that once you get assigned a priority, based on
the government-mandated priority criteria, you're stuck with it, and no
matter where you go, you end up behind others with higher priority.


You are making this up as you go along. Too bad you don't care about
facts - the discussion would be a lot shorter if you did.


Hey, I said it was my guess. You're the one who replied.


There is no priority list!


Of course there is, and the teenage girl and old guy with bad knees are on
the bottom of it.


Priorities are set by the doctors and hospitals. You can get a different
result by dealing with a different doctor. Not all referring physicians
have equal access to all surgeons - they are a good old boy network and
some have better access to some than others.


Not according to the AP. I believe the AP, not you.


Example - Toronto's top ophthalmologist is very hard to see. He specializes
in difficult cases. A friend of mine (a doctor) had a problem with his
nephew and could not get an appointment with the specialist in a timely
manner - his nephew ended up getting treatment with another specialist.
My doctor had a concern about me and got me an appointment with the
same top ophthalmologist in a week. It all depends on who you know.
No government involved. No list involved.


Did the nephew require hospitalization and surgery? If not, your anecdote is
irrelevant.


However, this is a guess, and I could be wrong.


No kidding - you're wrong more often than you're right. That doesn't
stop you from posting your bull****.


Nor does it keep you from eating it up with some fava beans and a nice
Chianti.
--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

Š 2005 Scott Weiser

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry basskisser General 125 October 4th 04 10:22 PM
Bush fiddles while health care burns Harry Krause General 71 September 17th 04 11:21 PM
OT- Ode to Immigration Harry Krause General 83 July 27th 04 07:37 PM
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! NOYB General 25 March 15th 04 09:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017