"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 26-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

Try again - there was nothing in that link that said
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.

Put up or shut up, dickhead.
=================
Yes, there was. I see you don't lie any better than the other
buffoons...

Two sites provided unsubstantiated claims that people are dying
in waiting lines. Try providing one that substantiates that
claim.

The third one states:
"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long cannot
be
confirmed or denied from current research and information."

You still haven't posted a link to prove your ridiculous
claim.
=============================
Again, that you don't like the messenger doen't mean the facts
are false. That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing. Like kman, if you weren't so afraid of the data you
could look for yourself. It's out there. I let kman look for
himself, and you now, because the first site was too 'right-wing'
the next was too 'union'. If the sites I provided are wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.



Mike

in article , rick at
wrote on 2/28/05 7:11 PM:


"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 26-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

Try again - there was nothing in that link that said
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.

Put up or shut up, dickhead.
=================
Yes, there was. I see you don't lie any better than the other
buffoons...

Two sites provided unsubstantiated claims that people are dying
in waiting lines. Try providing one that substantiates that
claim.

The third one states:
"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long cannot
be
confirmed or denied from current research and information."

You still haven't posted a link to prove your ridiculous
claim.
=============================
Again, that you don't like the messenger doen't mean the facts
are false. That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing. Like kman, if you weren't so afraid of the data you
could look for yourself. It's out there. I let kman look for
himself, and you now, because the first site was too 'right-wing'
the next was too 'union'. If the sites I provided are wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

The union article did not reference any evidence. It was just as dishonest
as you are. But at least the union has a reason to be that way (to get more
money for their members) whereas you are just a scumbag.

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article ,
rick at
wrote on 2/28/05 7:11 PM:


"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 26-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

Try again - there was nothing in that link that said
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.

Put up or shut up, dickhead.
=================
Yes, there was. I see you don't lie any better than the
other
buffoons...

Two sites provided unsubstantiated claims that people are
dying
in waiting lines. Try providing one that substantiates that
claim.

The third one states:
"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long
cannot
be
confirmed or denied from current research and information."

You still haven't posted a link to prove your ridiculous
claim.
=============================
Again, that you don't like the messenger doen't mean the facts
are false. That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing. Like kman, if you weren't so afraid of the data you
could look for yourself. It's out there. I let kman look for
himself, and you now, because the first site was too
'right-wing'
the next was too 'union'. If the sites I provided are wrong,
it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

The union article did not reference any evidence. It was just
as dishonest
as you are.
================
Provide sites that refute their contentions, liar.

But at least the union has a reason to be that way (to get more
money for their members) whereas you are just a scumbag.
=================
And you're still a proven liar...

"rick" wrote in message
k.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article , rick at
wrote on 2/28/05 7:11 PM:


"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 26-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

Try again - there was nothing in that link that said
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.

Put up or shut up, dickhead.
=================
Yes, there was. I see you don't lie any better than the other
buffoons...

Two sites provided unsubstantiated claims that people are dying
in waiting lines. Try providing one that substantiates that
claim.

The third one states:
"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long cannot
be
confirmed or denied from current research and information."

You still haven't posted a link to prove your ridiculous
claim.
=============================
Again, that you don't like the messenger doen't mean the facts
are false. That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing. Like kman, if you weren't so afraid of the data you
could look for yourself. It's out there. I let kman look for
himself, and you now, because the first site was too 'right-wing'
the next was too 'union'. If the sites I provided are wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

The union article did not reference any evidence. It was just as
dishonest
as you are.
================
Provide sites that refute their contentions, liar.

There are no sites available to refute something that is based only in
imagination. There's no facts or evidence to challenge.

"KMAN" wrote in message
. ..

"rick" wrote in message
k.net...

"KMAN" wrote in message
...
in article
, rick at
wrote on 2/28/05 7:11 PM:


"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 26-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

Try again - there was nothing in that link that said
Canadians are dying in waiting lines.

Put up or shut up, dickhead.
=================
Yes, there was. I see you don't lie any better than the
other
buffoons...

Two sites provided unsubstantiated claims that people are
dying
in waiting lines. Try providing one that substantiates
that
claim.

The third one states:
"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long
cannot
be
confirmed or denied from current research and information."

You still haven't posted a link to prove your ridiculous
claim.
=============================
Again, that you don't like the messenger doen't mean the
facts
are false. That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing. Like kman, if you weren't so afraid of the data
you
could look for yourself. It's out there. I let kman look
for
himself, and you now, because the first site was too
'right-wing'
the next was too 'union'. If the sites I provided are
wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

The union article did not reference any evidence. It was just
as dishonest
as you are.
================
Provide sites that refute their contentions, liar.

There are no sites available to refute something that is based
only in imagination. There's no facts or evidence to challenge.
=================
The facts are there, fool. Too bad for you, eh?

On 28-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing.

I believe they are unsubstantiated because they are!
Post a link to a reference that substantiates these
claims.

If the sites I provided are wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

_You_ provided that, idiot! I requote:

"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long cannot
be confirmed or denied from current research and information."

Try again, dickhead. Post something of substance instead of
a lot of crap.

Mike

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 28-Feb-2005, "rick" wrote:

That YOU believe they are ubsubstantiated means
nothing.

I believe they are unsubstantiated because they are!
Post a link to a reference that substantiates these
claims.
=====================
They are substantiated by the sites I provided fool. try reading
and researching for yourself, or are you too afarid, like kamn
is?



If the sites I provided are wrong, it
should be easy then for you to find refutation of the data.
Hasn't been done yet.

_You_ provided that, idiot! I requote:

"Claims about patients dying because of waiting too long
cannot
be confirmed or denied from current research and
information."

Try again, dickhead. Post something of substance instead of
a lot of crap.
=====================
Nope, that doesn't deny they exist. Other site claim otherwise,
like canadian medical journals. Do try to keep up, fool.



Mike