Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:



Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,

then

please

post

where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",

as

you

have

stated.

Did he not say that?

John H


Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?

After

all,

you

are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his

Vietnam

activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?

Maybe

you

read it and forgot.

John H

The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one

who

made

the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H


I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated

that

he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably

around

somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that

he

said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were

erroneous.

Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H


Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove
that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.



Wouldn't it be easier to simply accept the fact that Herring sees
what
he wants to see and reads what he wants to read, and forms
conclusions
that have very little to do with the information presented?

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

On 3 Feb 2005 05:00:59 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.

I'm not even sure what subject you're talking about. I *thought* he
said he identified bodies in Vietnam. If he didn't say that, as you
seem to think, then what did he say?

What *did* he do with bodies in Vietnam?

You seem pretty knowledgeable on any subject, so you should be a great
source for the information. Did I start this thread? Was this before
or after I promised not to call Harry any more names?

Did you watch President Bush give one of the greatest State of the
Union addresses of all time last night. I sure hope so. I can
understand why you are looking to change party affiliation now. The
Republicans will welcome you, but you may have to clean up your act a
little. As I am an independent, I can't tell you everything you have
to do to qualify.

Now, to the real question: A stone is dropped into a pond, the ripples
forming concentric circles which expand. At what rate is the area of
one of these circles increasing when the radius is 4 m and increasing
at the rate of 0.5 m/s?

I'm thinking of putting a pond in my back yard in which to raise
flounder, so this question is on topic.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On 3 Feb 2005 07:48:19 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:



Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,

then

please

post

where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",

as

you

have

stated.

Did he not say that?

John H


Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?

After

all,

you

are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his

Vietnam

activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?

Maybe

you

read it and forgot.

John H

The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one

who

made

the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H


I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated

that

he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably

around

somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that

he

said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were

erroneous.

Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H


Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove
that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.



Wouldn't it be easier to simply accept the fact that Herring sees
what
he wants to see and reads what he wants to read, and forms
conclusions
that have very little to do with the information presented?

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

I thought you were asking *me* for help! Now I see you've gotten
someone else involved. How many different answers are you looking for?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

I thought you were asking *me* for help! Now I see you've gotten
someone else involved. How many different answers are you looking
for?

John H



Wow, you ARE dense, huh? My God, if you can't understand what YOU have
posted, then I really feel sorry for you!

JohnH wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 05:00:59 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in
VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all
his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU
stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this
as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.

I'm not even sure what subject you're talking about. I *thought* he
said he identified bodies in Vietnam.

You thought wrong. If you didn't know for sure, and "thought" he said
something, you should have said, *I THINK Harry said.......*, but no,
you stated it as absolute fact.

What *did* he do with bodies in Vietnam?

I'm not doing your homework for you. You failed, you know it, move on.

You seem pretty knowledgeable on any subject, so you should be a
great
source for the information. Did I start this thread? Was this before
or after I promised not to call Harry any more names?

What's the point? Hell, apparently you don't even know what YOU have
written, you keep asking for clarification.......whew.....

Did you watch President Bush give one of the greatest State of the
Union addresses of all time last night.

Full of lies, and half truths, just another glee party for the
lemmings.

I can
understand why you are looking to change party affiliation now.

What on EARTH would make you think that I am "looking to change party
affiliation now"?? Be specific. Is this just another of the long list
of things that magically appear in your head???

Now, to the real question: A stone is dropped into a pond, the
ripples
forming concentric circles which expand. At what rate is the area of
one of these circles increasing when the radius is 4 m and increasing
at the rate of 0.5 m/s?

Simple answer, really. Try it.

I'm thinking of putting a pond in my back yard in which to raise
flounder, so this question is on topic.

On WHAT topic? Why don't we stick to the task at hand first, John. Was
your post about Harry erroneous, or was it a lie?

John H