| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Good god, you posting about dinners!
Ha!
|
|
JohnH wrote: On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: Ha! Read the post, dip****, it was much more fishing related than yours! John H Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh? |
On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: Ha! Read the post, dip****, it was much more fishing related than yours! John H Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh? That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a ****ing liar, however. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: Ha! Read the post, dip****, it was much more fishing related than yours! John H Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh? That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a ****ing liar, however. John H Awwww...da widdle retired soldier boy is sooooooo upset....awwwwwwwwwwww. Harry is so bitter on the newsgroups as he gets no F---ing. |
krause
You claimed to have been in nam,,, you lied,, there is no record of you in nam,, nothing,,, you lied again,,, (wow,, surprised),,, **** krause,, your lies just become part of your life,,, not even a big deal anymore when you lie krause as it happens so frequently,, krause,, go visit your mom today,,, I am sure she is some how wondering if she has any children,,, think about your own children there krause,, the ones who left you ,, promising never to associate with you again,,, AS YOU SAID,,, think of poor old toothless mom over there on the west coast of florida in the cheapest home you could find for her,,, go visit your mom krause,,,, I am not saying to sleep with her,,or have sex with her as you said about my mom,, just go visit the old gal,,, take her out fishing on your boats,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... JohnH wrote: On 25 Jan 2005 10:10:33 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 24 Jan 2005 15:28:23 GMT, (Florida Keyz) wrote: Ha! Read the post, dip****, it was much more fishing related than yours! John H Ah, so you DO find it intelligent to call people petty names, huh? That's twice. Couldn't help myself either time. Glad you're there to remind me to exercise better manners. Harry is still a ****ing liar, however. John H Awwww...da widdle retired soldier boy is sooooooo upset....awwwwwwwwwwww. |
Tuuuk wrote: krause You claimed to have been in nam,,, you lied,, there is no record of you in nam,, nothing,,, Tuuuk, please tell us just exactly what records you have researched to come to that conclusion. |
Tuuuk wrote: ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,, Your childish name calling negates any validity. but please try and stay with the program,,, krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise you??? again,, please try and stay with the program,,, Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be specific. also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how about giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,, What records have you researched? Again, be specific. Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it from an educated position,, here is why At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a liar,, probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I have caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the probabilities of my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you are innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove my statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and krause might not appreciate you doing that,,, So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again, please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary. So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is clearly obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind??? See above. |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:21:26 -0500, " Tuuuk"
wrote: ok,, krause,,,, lets have a look,,, ""'''' So, tell us, Tuuuuu,,,,,k: You still sleeping with your mom?''''''' well that is an intelligent question,,, what is your IQ today there krause,,, - 9 again??? and lets look at the lie "'''''You mean, the tree I carved my initials into isn't there anymore?"''"" Can you tell me what the name of the tree was?? last time I was in the area I didn't really see any trees that had a bark as easily carved as the N.A. Maple or Oak or Birch and many palm, or scale bark or some bamboo,,, lol,,, krause,,, I can see you now,,, searching on google a name of a tree in nam that you can carve in,, only to find there aint,,, lol,,,, ooo krause,,, you are off the meds again tonight aint ya,,, lol,,,, because nobody can be this stupid,,,, NOBODY!!!!!!! but lets answer your question,,,, ""'''' So, tell us, Tuuuuu,,,,,k: You still sleeping with your mom?''''''' lol,,, you're surely off your meds tonight,,, lol,,,, What happen,, your mother catch you tapping into her meds??? That is another thing about you westerners,,,, lol,,,, your pharmaceutical list is unbelievable,,, you people take more pills than we can produce for you,,, lol,,, You take more pills than kanter's mother has boyfriends,,, lol,,,, Thats another thing about you westerners,,, guess what krause,, when you took off for those three day visits to Bangkok,,,, did you notice your whisky was drunk while you were away?? You probably didn't notice your wife,,,,ooops,,, wives were so sneaky they tidied up nicely,,,lol,,,, So to answer your question,, no ,,, I do not sleep with my mother,,, although as I said earlier,, it is not uncommon for Asians to share beds until they are well into their twenties,,,, mostly the daughters,, even aunts,,, lol,,, krause,,, you think they could be lesbians??? From a german who marries same sex?? and allows them to adopt??? krause,,, you really should learn more about cultures before you criticize,, or laugh,,, or insult or what ever it is you do,,,, I find it funny though,,, do you know that the last time you slept with your mother krause was before you were born,,, lol,,, and sleeping doesn't always mean you are having anal sex with her,,, lol,,, unless that is what you did,,, hmmmmmmmmm that could explain a lot,,, but lets not go down that road yet,,,, lol,,,,, Tuuk, please don't assume *all* westerners are Harry Krause clones. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On 27 Jan 2005 05:41:28 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: Tuuuk wrote: ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,, Your childish name calling negates any validity. but please try and stay with the program,,, krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise you??? again,, please try and stay with the program,,, Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be specific. also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how about giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,, What records have you researched? Again, be specific. Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it from an educated position,, here is why At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a liar,, probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I have caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the probabilities of my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you are innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove my statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and krause might not appreciate you doing that,,, So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again, please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary. So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is clearly obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind??? See above. Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 27 Jan 2005 05:41:28 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Tuuuk wrote: ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,, Your childish name calling negates any validity. but please try and stay with the program,,, krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise you??? again,, please try and stay with the program,,, Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be specific. also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how about giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,, What records have you researched? Again, be specific. Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it from an educated position,, here is why At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a liar,, probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I have caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the probabilities of my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you are innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove my statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and krause might not appreciate you doing that,,, So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again, please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary. So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is clearly obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind??? See above. Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. Show me where he said that. John H Perhaps before you call others liars, you should learn to not spin what others have stated. |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"""''' Still sleeping with your mommy?'"""'
krause,,, no ,, I do not sleep with my mother,,, how about you?? Do you sleep with your mother?? Are you one of the strange men who gets to slide in and out of those sheets??? No wonder she is confused old lady,,, she has seen such a variety of men (with the three husbands) and you ,,,lol,,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tuuuk wrote: ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,, but please try and stay with the program,,, krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise you??? again,, please try and stay with the program,,, also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, What filing cabinet did you look into, Idiot. Still sleeping with your mommy? |
asskisser,,,
why don't you do a google search,,, and you will see the countless numbers of lies your puppet master has said,,, I showed you one today,,, krause saying he doesn't drink much and yet the other day ,, the coldest, the biggest blizzard of the year and krause posts he went to the upscale liquor store for a special brand of booze that the clerk had in his cooler. Also that same day krause said he looked out his window ,,, it looked myserable out ( I mentioned it was a mirror) and krause said he was not even going out to feed the critters and him and the cat will just watch through the glass at the snow and not go out in it. I mean i can go on with a 10 page rant on krause's lies,,, the hand gun,,, then no hand gun,, krause reported me to RCMP,,, Sheriff,,, his neighbor the cop,,, krause has huge acreage where the deer and buffalo roam,, he has visitors daily who he allows to picnic and take photos,,lol,,krause claims to have a loaded shot gun in his front closet,, come on asskisser,,, the list is endless,,,, he said his own children left him promising never to associate and then he claimed he didn't say it,,, he said his mother was stuffed in a home on the west coast of florida,, then he changed his story and said east coast,,, lol,,, **** ,, I could go on but I have to go,,, lol,,,, are you blind there asskisser or just stupid or just a dumb puppet,,, "basskisser" wrote in message ups.com... JohnH wrote: On 27 Jan 2005 05:41:28 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: Tuuuk wrote: ok,,, asskisser,,, lets have a look,,, Your childish name calling negates any validity. but please try and stay with the program,,, krause was not in nam,, its obvious,,, he lied,, does that surprise you??? again,, please try and stay with the program,,, Again, I've asked what PROOF you have that he was not in VietNam? Be specific. also,, I believe I said there were no records of krause in nam,,, how about giving the head a shake for us,,, here is why,,, What records have you researched? Again, be specific. Who did the research?? did you?? I made the comment,, and I made it from an educated position,, here is why At least 10 different people on this group have called krause a liar,, probably you to,,, If not more,, I personally call him a liar,, as I have caught him in well over a dozen lies,, Not to mention the probabilities of my accuracy in my statement you question,,, but in your country you are innocent until proven guilty,, so if you think your smart,, you prove my statement wrong,,, lol,,,, hint,,, that would make you my puppet and krause might not appreciate you doing that,,, So, in your ignorance, you think you have "caught" him in lies? Again, please be specific, and detailed. When you state what he has lied about, tell me what evidence you have to the contrary. So asskisser,,, please try and stick with the program,,, it is clearly obvious the man is a lier,,, what are you ,,,,blind??? See above. Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. Show me where he said that. John H Perhaps before you call others liars, you should learn to not spin what others have stated. |
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H Speaking of liars, John, are you going to show me where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam, as you previously stated in this thread? |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On 28 Jan 2005 05:21:37 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H Speaking of liars, John, are you going to show me where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam, as you previously stated in this thread? Find it yourself. First, unplug your head. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:30:56 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Tuuuk wrote: """''' Still sleeping with your mommy?'"""' krause,,, no ,, I do not sleep with my mother,,, Hmmmm. But you said that was the way things were in Thailand. Were you tossed out of the nest? Still infatuated with sex with mothers, Krause? You're a liar, Krause, a most despicable liar. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:46:16 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: basskisser wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H Speaking of liars, John, are you going to show me where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam, as you previously stated in this thread? Herring, apparently, suffers from the same reading comprehension problem as Tuuk. He sees words in front of him and assumes they mean something else. Maybe Herring is suffering from delayed stress syndrome. I'm suffering from your oral diarrhea, Krause. You are a liar. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. |
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? |
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly lies. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly lies. Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied about his education.....and then welched on the bet. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not. Who made the error? John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:36:35 -0500, "P.Fritz"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly lies. Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied about his education.....and then welched on the bet. Maybe he just made a mistake, not realizing how much education he had. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
P.Fritz wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly lies. Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied about his education.....and then welched on the bet. Grow up. Try it, Fritz. Can you act like an adult? It's know wonder you aren't man enough to raise your kid or keep a wife. |
P.Fritz wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message ... On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser" wrote: JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on. No need wasting more time with the fool. I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a ****ing liar, Krause." He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out. He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar. He is *worthy* of that comment. [Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a liar.] John H Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've finally unplugged your head and seen the light. John H John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a liar? There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly lies. Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied about his education.....and then welched on the bet. Grow up. Try it, Fritz. Can you act like an adult? It's no wonder you aren't man enough to raise your kid or keep a wife. |
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:36:02 -0500, JohnH
wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Were you a jock? I've never heard of West Point chasing someone who wasn't. When I was a teacher at the West Point prep school, the number of applications to the academy was far in excess (9-10 times) the capacity. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:36:02 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Were you a jock? I've never heard of West Point chasing someone who wasn't. When I was a teacher at the West Point prep school, the number of applications to the academy was far in excess (9-10 times) the capacity. I'm assuming that this post was directed at me. You guessed it. I was a perfect canidate for the Academy.......top 10% of my class, high SAT's, national merit scholar, off the charts on the AFVAB.........AND I was about 30lb too light to go major division 1. (6'-6 230lb was just a little light for a ND or Ohio State..if only I weighed then what I do now LOL ....I did have a friend that had the extra 30lbs that got a full ride to Northwestern) I also had my pick of every Ivy league school, which recuited me heavily too (they don't give athletic scholarships) but opted to forgo sports because it would have been a conflict with scheduling courses for my major........practice time always conflicted with lab times. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:11:26 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:36:02 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Were you a jock? I've never heard of West Point chasing someone who wasn't. When I was a teacher at the West Point prep school, the number of applications to the academy was far in excess (9-10 times) the capacity. I'm assuming that this post was directed at me. You guessed it. I was a perfect canidate for the Academy.......top 10% of my class, high SAT's, national merit scholar, off the charts on the AFVAB.........AND I was about 30lb too light to go major division 1. (6'-6 230lb was just a little light for a ND or Ohio State..if only I weighed then what I do now LOL ....I did have a friend that had the extra 30lbs that got a full ride to Northwestern) I also had my pick of every Ivy league school, which recuited me heavily too (they don't give athletic scholarships) but opted to forgo sports because it would have been a conflict with scheduling courses for my major........practice time always conflicted with lab times. A jock with some smarts. The USMA dream! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:11:26 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:36:02 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Were you a jock? I've never heard of West Point chasing someone who wasn't. When I was a teacher at the West Point prep school, the number of applications to the academy was far in excess (9-10 times) the capacity. I'm assuming that this post was directed at me. You guessed it. I was a perfect canidate for the Academy.......top 10% of my class, high SAT's, national merit scholar, off the charts on the AFVAB.........AND I was about 30lb too light to go major division 1. (6'-6 230lb was just a little light for a ND or Ohio State..if only I weighed then what I do now LOL ....I did have a friend that had the extra 30lbs that got a full ride to Northwestern) I also had my pick of every Ivy league school, which recuited me heavily too (they don't give athletic scholarships) but opted to forgo sports because it would have been a conflict with scheduling courses for my major........practice time always conflicted with lab times. PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:11:26 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: "JohnH" wrote in message . .. On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:36:02 -0500, JohnH wrote: On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one is). The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar. There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them. John H No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of a group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and arrange for retrieval. Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked. You're a liar, Krause. John H You're a pathetic failure. Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted nothing and lied about it. You're a ****ing liar, Krause. John H You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got drafted, and stayed in the Army. You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes Were you a jock? I've never heard of West Point chasing someone who wasn't. When I was a teacher at the West Point prep school, the number of applications to the academy was far in excess (9-10 times) the capacity. I'm assuming that this post was directed at me. You guessed it. I was a perfect canidate for the Academy.......top 10% of my class, high SAT's, national merit scholar, off the charts on the AFVAB.........AND I was about 30lb too light to go major division 1. (6'-6 230lb was just a little light for a ND or Ohio State..if only I weighed then what I do now LOL ....I did have a friend that had the extra 30lbs that got a full ride to Northwestern) I also had my pick of every Ivy league school, which recuited me heavily too (they don't give athletic scholarships) but opted to forgo sports because it would have been a conflict with scheduling courses for my major........practice time always conflicted with lab times. PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! Of course asslicker will jump in ad make some wild and unfounded accusations.......not wanting to be "cow downed" LMAO John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: JohnH wrote: PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! John H That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring. I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy. Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar. John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
"JohnH" wrote in message ... On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: JohnH wrote: PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down the Air Force and Naval Academies! John H That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring. I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy. Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar. Instead he is wasting his life as a two bit union rag writer...... John H On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD, on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! "Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it." Rene Descartes |
krause
I will answer your question,,, '''""'Were you tossed out of the nest?'"'" like your children were??? oops,, no I forgot,, you said,,,YOU YOURSELF SAID that your children left you,, promising never to associate again,, those were your own words,,, So,,, I wasn't tossed from the nest,,, O ya,, that is a "Family Law" kinda word,,, right krause??? lol,,, yet you have lost 2 wives,,, lost them now that is more a fitting word for your situation,,, the matrimonial nest,,, lol,,, krause,, were you tossed out of the nest or did you toss the ex-wives out of the nest,,, ? Your two ex-wives we are talking about ,,, now your own children left you for their own mother,,, AS YOU SAID,,, so they left the nest,,, lol,,, so you tossed your wife out,,, and then your children ran to their mother,,, AS YOU SAID,,, Sounds like trouble in paradise krause,,, I mean you have all these toys,, boats,, guns,,, property,, critters,,, cars,, jobs,, associates,, etc etc etc,, the best of everything,,, yet your own personal life is the pits,,, lol,,, 3 wives,, a mother who also has just as many,,, broken up family,, lol,,krause you are funny,,,,,,,,, Sounds like your own family has many tossing out of the nest,,, lol,,, "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Tuuuk wrote: """''' Still sleeping with your mommy?'"""' krause,,, no ,, I do not sleep with my mother,,, Hmmmm. But you said that was the way things were in Thailand. Were you tossed out of the nest? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com