On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:43:27 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down
the Air Force and Naval Academies!
John H

That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring.
I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy.


Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have
made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar.

John H


I'll bet you've played with lots of pimples on lots of soldiers' asses,
eh, John?

Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then.
John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:13:12 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Tuuuk wrote:


yet you have lost 2 wives,,, lost them now that is more a fitting word for
your situation,,, the matrimonial nest,,, lol,,, krause,, were you tossed
out of the nest or did you toss the ex-wives out of the nest,,, ? Your two
ex-wives we are talking about

One more time, crap-for-brains. I have been married twice. I am still
married and living with my second wife. I have one ex-wife. Not two.
You have fixated yourself, as it were, on incorrect information you have
internalized.

No wonder you will never amount to dog**** in this world.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause. Dog **** is a big step up from your
level.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:18:29 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:43:27 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:33:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:



PS. Now I'm waiting for Harry to tell us how and why he turned down
the Air Force and Naval Academies!
John H

That should be easy, even for a d.f. like you, Herring.
I didn't want to waste my life as a soldier-boy.


Such high praise from the mouth of a liar, Harry. You wouldn't have
made a pimple on a soldier's ass, liar.

John H


I'll bet you've played with lots of pimples on lots of soldiers' asses,
eh, John?


Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then.
John H


I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with
the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you
decided to stay in the Army.

Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****.
What a pathetic liar, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:33:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:


Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then.
John H


I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with
the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you
decided to stay in the Army.


Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****.
What a pathetic liar, Krause.



Why, Johhnyboy, I'm just playing with you at the level you set.

Tell me, when you attend those military reunions, do you hop in the
shower with the boys?

Try more name-calling and innuendos, Krause. You're just a ****ing
liar. For you, nothing more is necessary.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:47:26 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:33:51 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


Bet on your lying abilities, Krause. You'll win then.
John H


I'll bet you loved barracks life, eh, Johhny...all those showers with
the boys...all those butt pimples to squeeze. What joy. No wonder you
decided to stay in the Army.


Keep digging, Harry. You may yet reach a level lower than dog ****.
What a pathetic liar, Krause.



Why, Johhnyboy, I'm just playing with you at the level you set.

Tell me, when you attend those military reunions, do you hop in the
shower with the boys?


Try more name-calling and innuendos, Krause. You're just a ****ing
liar. For you, nothing more is necessary.

John H


Why, Johnnyboy, I'm just tossing the balls you're trying to serve back
at you...are you so dumb you haven't figured that out?

No intelligence needed to know you're a liar, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

P. Fritz wrote:

Of course asslicker will jump in ad make some wild and unfounded
accusations.......not wanting to be "cow downed" LMAO



Paul, I see that you are particularly childish acting today. Have a bad
weekend? No one from usenet around to help you raise your kid, or deal
with your wife leaving you?

On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

Where?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

Where?

Asslicker is just demonstrating his parrot harry routine.......it is a
symptom of his FAS.


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

P.Fritz wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.
The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably
doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if
you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies.
I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and
failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a
failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is
feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless.
Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate
response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post
is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print,
even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following
up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that
he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster
was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar
would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

Where?

Asslicker is just demonstrating his parrot harry routine.......it is
a
symptom of his FAS.

Please show what evidence you have that I have FAS. Be specific. On the
contrary, Paul, if you knew anything about FAS, you'd know that one of
the symptoms of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, is childish behavior. Is that
why you continue to call childish names? Or is it just because you need
to bolster your pathetic ego since you don't have the fortitude to
raise a child, or keep a wife?

JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.
The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if
you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies.
I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and
failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a
failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is
feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless.
Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate
response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post
is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print,
even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following
up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that
he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster
was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar
would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

Where?

John H

Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said this:

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h=ADere. His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br=ADazenly
lies.
John H=20

So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error.

On 31 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.
The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if
you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies.
I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and
failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a
failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is
feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless.
Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate
response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post
is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print,
even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following
up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that
he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster
was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar
would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made an
error.

Where?

John H

Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said this:

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h*ere. His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br*azenly
lies.
John H

So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error.

Nothing erroneous there, except punctuation.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 09:49:03 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 07:38:57 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH"

wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam.
The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary
units.
Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably
doesn't
even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no
credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself
if
you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified
bodies.
I
said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or
later,
you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which
I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and
failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a
failure
in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar?
I'm
glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is
feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless.
Killfile
him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate
response
to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause
post
is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same ****
he
dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print,
even
if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name
following
up
a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in
anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful
discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said
that
he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar.
Glad
you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that
someone
said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the
poster
was
a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar
would
not.

Who made the error?

John H

John, has booze made your brain THAT bad? YOU said that YOU made
an
error.

Where?

John H

Right here, John. You stated that you WEREN'T a liar, then said
this:

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar h=ADere.
His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just br=ADazenly
lies.
John H

So, which is it, you are either a liar, or made an error.

Nothing erroneous there, except punctuation.

Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.

Did he not say that?

Looks like asslicker is trying to 'cow down' you LMAO


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

P.Fritz wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

Looks like asslicker is trying to 'cow down' you LMAO

Paul, again, I'm sorry that you've never been to northern PA to hear
that particular expression. And, I see that you are still not adult
enough to post anything without childish name calling. Maybe, seeing
how you need a support group for every other aspect of your pathetic
life, you can get support for that. Try it. You may actually get
someone beside Tuuuk to befriend you.

JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you
are the one who stated that he said so.

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all, you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
snip...
Tuuk, by the way, isn't the only fool who almost always gets everything
wrong. But he's probably the best example.


Tuuk couldn't care less about the truth. His only concern is how to best
jab and poke at you...probing for any perceived weakness.

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Well, he tries, but he's not equipped to do battle with me, verbally or
otherwise. He's a real mommy's boy, in ways I hadn't imagined. Have you
noticed that he's so typical of the right-wing buttwipe cowards around
here...eager to attack on anything, but very, very reluctant to let you
know anything about him.

I've got my watch cat on the alert for anyone pulling a pedicab down our
street.

Or delivering sushi...or whatever. He admitted that's one of his jobs.
You're right...he hasn't mentioned what town he lives in...and I can't blame
him. If the local hard line separatists in Quebec read what he says about
the French here........he'd be sushi himself.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.

No, I've been reluctant to try Asian food since I heard dogs were a
delicacy. This doesn't apply to the 'Western' version of Chinese food.

Subject: Good god, you posting about dinners!
From: Harry Krause

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.


Not sure how you can like Asian food and not like Thai food?
But to each his own.

Capt. Bill

krause,,,

have you ever tried german food?? OOps,,, o ya,, I forgot,, you said you a
german but then later reversed that statement and said that krause wasn't
german.

Kinda like when you put your own mother on the east coast only to move her
to the west coast.
Kinda like when you claimed you had a loaded hand gun in your home only to
claim a day later that you do not.
Kinda like the time you reported that you are on your third wife, this time
20 years your junior,,lol,, only to report that you lied.
Kinda like the time you reported the sheriff up the road watches your lane
for you, and land only to report that now you are watching it.
Kinda like the time you reported you were not leaving your home all day
because of the miserable conditions outside only to report an hour later
that you had been to the upscale alcohol store.
Kinda like the time ,,,, gees,,, krause it is every time,,,


You are a liar,,,very bad one but still a liar,,,










"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Don White wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

BTW, have you ever had Thai food? I tried it a few times at supposedly
good Thai restaurants. Smelled awful and tasted worse, and I really like
Asian food. Blech.


No, I've been reluctant to try Asian food since I heard dogs were a
delicacy. This doesn't apply to the 'Western' version of Chinese food.



Woof!

JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error, then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam", as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise? After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far? Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.

Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:



Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,

then

please

post

where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",

as

you

have

stated.

Did he not say that?

John H


Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?

After

all,

you

are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his

Vietnam

activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?

Maybe

you

read it and forgot.

John H

The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one

who

made

the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H


I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated

that

he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably

around

somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that

he

said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were

erroneous.

Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H


Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove
that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.



Wouldn't it be easier to simply accept the fact that Herring sees
what
he wants to see and reads what he wants to read, and forms
conclusions
that have very little to do with the information presented?

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

On 3 Feb 2005 05:00:59 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he "identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that subject.

I'm not even sure what subject you're talking about. I *thought* he
said he identified bodies in Vietnam. If he didn't say that, as you
seem to think, then what did he say?

What *did* he do with bodies in Vietnam?

You seem pretty knowledgeable on any subject, so you should be a great
source for the information. Did I start this thread? Was this before
or after I promised not to call Harry any more names?

Did you watch President Bush give one of the greatest State of the
Union addresses of all time last night. I sure hope so. I can
understand why you are looking to change party affiliation now. The
Republicans will welcome you, but you may have to clean up your act a
little. As I am an independent, I can't tell you everything you have
to do to qualify.

Now, to the real question: A stone is dropped into a pond, the ripples
forming concentric circles which expand. At what rate is the area of
one of these circles increasing when the radius is 4 m and increasing
at the rate of 0.5 m/s?

I'm thinking of putting a pond in my back yard in which to raise
flounder, so this question is on topic.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On 3 Feb 2005 07:48:19 -0800, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:

JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"



wrote:



Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,

then

please

post

where Harry said that he "identified bodies in VietNam",

as

you

have

stated.

Did he not say that?

John H


Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?

After

all,

you

are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all his

Vietnam

activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?

Maybe

you

read it and forgot.

John H

The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one

who

made

the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H


I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU stated

that

he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably

around

somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that

he

said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were

erroneous.

Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H


Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove
that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.



Wouldn't it be easier to simply accept the fact that Herring sees
what
he wants to see and reads what he wants to read, and forms
conclusions
that have very little to do with the information presented?

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

I thought you were asking *me* for help! Now I see you've gotten
someone else involved. How many different answers are you looking for?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:

You're beating a dead horse here. Just let it go.

So true! He's so narrow minded that even if you ask the question, he
doesn't see it...

I thought you were asking *me* for help! Now I see you've gotten
someone else involved. How many different answers are you looking
for?

John H



Wow, you ARE dense, huh? My God, if you can't understand what YOU have
posted, then I really feel sorry for you!

JohnH wrote:
On 3 Feb 2005 05:00:59 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 2 Feb 2005 08:06:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 06:19:34 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 1 Feb 2005 04:51:21 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 13:04:53 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 31 Jan 2005 11:32:05 -0800, "basskisser"

wrote:


Prove it then. If you don't think you were in error,
then
please
post
where Harry said that he "identified bodies in
VietNam",
as
you
have
stated.

Did he not say that?

John H

Nope, not that I've ever seen. Can you prove otherwise?
After
all,
you
are the one who stated that he said so.

How far back did you check? He was telling us about all
his
Vietnam
activities many months ago. Did you check back that far?
Maybe
you
read it and forgot.

John H
The burden of proof is on YOU John, not me. YOU are the one
who
made
the allegation. Prove it.

You can't, John. That's NOT what he said.

Well, what do you think he said?

John H

I KNOW what he said, and it's easily found. Now again YOU
stated
that
he said he "identified bodies in VietNam". Prove it.

Hell, if you don't know what he said, ask him. He's probably
around
somewhere.

John H

Again, John, I know what he said. The fact remains, YOU stated
that
he
said that he "identified bodies" in VietNam. You presented this
as
fact. Prove it. If you can't, then you either lied, or were
erroneous.
Which is it?

Prove what he said.

John H

Man, are you for real? Are you really THAT uncapable of following a
thread that YOU initiated? Okay, let's try again, perhaps you will
understand.
YOU, John, stated that Harry had said in the past that he
"identified
bodies in VietNam". So, you attributed a quote to Harry. Prove that.
I didn't attribute ANY quote to Harry. I simply stated that he
didn't
say what YOU attributed to him. Seeing that YOU initiated a post
that
stated that Harry had said he "identified bodies in VietNam", the
burden of proof is on you. Now, you could always admit you posted
that
in ignorance, not knowing WHAT Harry had said regarding that
subject.

I'm not even sure what subject you're talking about. I *thought* he
said he identified bodies in Vietnam.

You thought wrong. If you didn't know for sure, and "thought" he said
something, you should have said, *I THINK Harry said.......*, but no,
you stated it as absolute fact.

What *did* he do with bodies in Vietnam?

I'm not doing your homework for you. You failed, you know it, move on.

You seem pretty knowledgeable on any subject, so you should be a
great
source for the information. Did I start this thread? Was this before
or after I promised not to call Harry any more names?

What's the point? Hell, apparently you don't even know what YOU have
written, you keep asking for clarification.......whew.....

Did you watch President Bush give one of the greatest State of the
Union addresses of all time last night.

Full of lies, and half truths, just another glee party for the
lemmings.

I can
understand why you are looking to change party affiliation now.

What on EARTH would make you think that I am "looking to change party
affiliation now"?? Be specific. Is this just another of the long list
of things that magically appear in your head???

Now, to the real question: A stone is dropped into a pond, the
ripples
forming concentric circles which expand. At what rate is the area of
one of these circles increasing when the radius is 4 m and increasing
at the rate of 0.5 m/s?

Simple answer, really. Try it.

I'm thinking of putting a pond in my back yard in which to raise
flounder, so this question is on topic.

On WHAT topic? Why don't we stick to the task at hand first, John. Was
your post about Harry erroneous, or was it a lie?

John H