On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life, got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is a
liar.]

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:46:16 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

basskisser wrote:
JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The identification

of

remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause stated he

was

not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know what

one

is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is a

liar.

There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was part

of a

group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification process,

and

arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.

You're a liar, Krause.

John H


Speaking of liars, John, are you going to show me where Harry said that
he "identified bodies" in VietNam, as you previously stated in this
thread?



Herring, apparently, suffers from the same reading comprehension problem
as Tuuk. He sees words in front of him and assumes they mean something
else.

Maybe Herring is suffering from delayed stress syndrome.

I'm suffering from your oral diarrhea, Krause. You are a liar.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is, "You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly
lies.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly
lies.


Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied
about his education.....and then welched on the bet.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On 28 Jan 2005 12:23:14 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility.
He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said
I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an
indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I
worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed
than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad
not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible
and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him
and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if
it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion.
He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

Someone who made an "error" would recant their story, a liar would not.

Who made the error?

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:36:35 -0500, "P.Fritz"
wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On 28 Jan 2005 12:02:22 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On 28 Jan 2005 08:14:06 -0800, "basskisser"
wrote:


JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 08:41:13 -0500, "JimH" wrote:


"JohnH" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 07:34:34 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:00:39 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:


JohnH wrote:

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:07:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:



JohnH wrote:


Krause stated he identified bodies in Vietnam. The
identification of
remains is a mission of military mortuary units. Krause
stated he was
not in a mortuary unit (hell, he probably doesn't even
know
what one
is).

The valid conclusion is that Krause has no credibility. He
is
a liar.
There are other examples. Search for yourself if you
missed
them.

John H


No, Tuukbrain, I did not say I identified bodies. I said I
was
part of
a
group that helped locate them, *start* an indentification
process, and
arrange for retrieval.

Keep trying to think, Tuukbrain. Sooner or later, you'll
probably
stumble across the name of the outfit for which I worked.


You're a liar, Krause.

John H

You're a pathetic failure.


Krause, I'd rather have attempted something and failed than
attempted
nothing and lied about it.

You're a ****ing liar, Krause.

John H


You never attempted anything, Herring. You were a failure in
life,
got
drafted, and stayed in the Army.

You think your opinion matters, you ****ing liar? I'm glad not
to
held
highly in your esteem. You're despicable, Krause.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and
necessary to
resolve it."
Rene Descartes

John, why bother with Krause? He is worthless. Killfile him and
move on.
No need wasting more time with the fool.


I honestly feel that Krause deserves an appropriate response to
every
post he makes. An appropriate response to a Krause post is,
"You're a
****ing liar, Krause."

He has earned that response.He deserves the same **** he dishes
out.
He shouldn't be deprived of seeing his name in print, even if it's
just to read that he's a ****ing, despicable liar.

He is *worthy* of that comment.

[Note: What more can I say? If you see my name following up a
Krause
post, just don't look. I will not be engaging him in anything
meaningful, because he is not worthy of meaningful discussion. He
is
a
liar.]

John H

Speaking of liars, John, please show where Harry said that he
"identified bodies" in VietNam.

You're absolutely correct. Krause *is* a ****ing liar. Glad you've
finally unplugged your head and seen the light.


John H

John, would you say that, if someone posted here that someone said
something, and that someone NEVER said that, that the poster was a
liar?

There you go again, talking about Harry. There is one liar here. His
name is Harry Krause. Others may make errors. Krause just brazenly
lies.


Actually there are two liars..........asslicker has been proven to have lied
about his education.....and then welched on the bet.

Maybe he just made a mistake, not realizing how much education he had.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes